Advertisement
CRWD or NOW or PANW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) vs. ServiceNow (NOW) vs. Palo Alto Networks (PANW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRWD, NOW, and PANW all posted sharp gains on May 29, 2026, reflecting renewed investor interest in technology and cybersecurity amid AI-related developments.
- CRWD reached a new 52-week high near $731, driven by pre-earnings momentum and analyst target increases ahead of its June 3 report.
- NOW surged over 14% in a single session as AI conviction spread across enterprise software, reversing some earlier 2026 weakness.
- PANW extended a multi-week rally exceeding 50% in recent periods, supported by strong cybersecurity demand and positioning ahead of its June 2 earnings.
- The three companies operate in overlapping but distinct areas—endpoint security for CRWD, workflow automation for NOW, and network security for PANW—creating varied exposure to growth drivers.
- Recent market activity highlights relative performance differences, with momentum favoring cybersecurity names while enterprise software shows signs of stabilization.
Introduction
Traders and investors often compare CRWD, NOW, and PANW because these stocks represent key segments of the technology sector, including cybersecurity and enterprise software. Each company benefits from long-term digital transformation trends, yet they face distinct competitive and valuation dynamics. This comparison appeals to market participants seeking to understand relative performance, sector sentiment, and positioning in the current environment. It provides context for those evaluating momentum, risk factors, and growth drivers across these names without favoring any single outcome.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CRWD (CrowdStrike Holdings) provides cloud-based endpoint security through its Falcon platform. In recent market activity, the stock advanced sharply, closing at $731.00 on May 29 after an 8.94% gain that established a new 52-week high. This move occurred ahead of the company’s scheduled earnings release and followed multiple analyst price target increases. Performance in recent weeks has reflected positive sentiment around artificial intelligence applications in cybersecurity, contributing to elevated trading volumes and upward price momentum. Broader factors such as expanding Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and platform adoption have supported the stock’s trajectory during this period.
NOW Overview and Recent Performance
NOW (ServiceNow) delivers enterprise workflow automation and digital transformation solutions. The stock experienced a notable rebound in recent sessions, rising 14.38% to close at $124.37 on May 29 amid a broader wave of AI-related conviction in the software sector. Earlier in 2026, the shares had faced pressure following quarterly results, resulting in substantial year-to-date declines before the recent recovery. Recent market activity shows stabilization supported by renewed focus on enterprise technology spending and integration of AI capabilities, with performance influenced by sector-wide sentiment shifts rather than company-specific catalysts alone.
PANW Overview and Recent Performance
PANW (Palo Alto Networks) offers network security and cybersecurity platforms. In recent weeks, the stock has demonstrated strong upward momentum, with a 9.28% advance to $281.69 on May 29 contributing to gains exceeding 50% over the prior 30-day period. This performance aligns with heightened demand for cybersecurity solutions and positions the company ahead of its upcoming earnings announcement. Recent market activity reflects sustained buying interest tied to platform expansion and sector tailwinds, resulting in elevated relative strength compared with broader market benchmarks during the same timeframe.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across its platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating the strongest suitability for prevailing market conditions appear in the Trending section. Available bots span diverse approaches, including trend-following, mean-reversion, and momentum styles, each with distinct statistics on win rates, drawdowns, and trade frequency. This curated view helps users explore options aligned with current conditions. Review the Trending AI Robots page for details on active strategies.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRWD focuses on endpoint protection with recurring revenue tied to subscription growth, while NOW emphasizes workflow platforms and PANW targets network and cloud security. Recent momentum has favored all three, yet CRWD and PANW show more pronounced short-term gains linked to cybersecurity themes compared with NOW’s recovery from earlier weakness. Valuation sensitivity differs, with high multiples across the group making them responsive to earnings and growth revisions. Risk factors include competitive intensity in AI-enhanced security and potential shifts in enterprise spending patterns. Sector exposure remains concentrated in technology, with varying degrees of overlap in customer bases and product ecosystems. Market sentiment has improved collectively in recent weeks, though individual price behavior reflects distinct catalysts and positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency and relative momentum in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of continued outperformance to CRWD due to its new 52-week high and sustained upward trajectory ahead of earnings. PANW follows closely with strong multi-week gains, while NOW shows stabilization but from a lower base. These assessments rely on pattern recognition rather than guarantees and should be weighed against individual risk tolerance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and PANW’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PANW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PANW’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PANW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while NOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -9.16% , and PANW (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated +2.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
NOW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.12% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | NOW | PANW | |
| Capitalization | 174B | 105B | 228B |
| EBITDA | 329M | 3.24B | 1.99B |
| Gain YTD | 45.661 | -33.318 | 51.802 |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 60.80 | 243.15 |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 14B | 10.6B |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 5.18B | 3.11B |
| Total Debt | 821M | 2.43B | 2.07B |
CRWD | NOW | PANW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 83 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 94 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 54 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 62 | 5 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 95 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOW's Valuation (79) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as PANW (87) in the Computer Communications industry, and is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that NOW's stock grew similarly to PANW’s and similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (18) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for NOW (94) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PANW's stock grew similarly to CRWD’s and significantly faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
NOW's SMR Rating (54) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (87) in the Computer Communications industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (92) in the null industry. This means that NOW's stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s and somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (38) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NOW (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PANW's stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s and somewhat faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (67) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for NOW (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PANW's stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s and significantly faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | NOW | PANW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 68% | 7 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 67% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| HUBS - CRWD | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||
NOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOW | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| CRWD - NOW | 68% Closely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| TEAM - NOW | 67% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| MSFT - NOW | 67% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| PANW - NOW | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| NTNX - NOW | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
More | ||||