Advertisement
CRWD vs HUBS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike (CRWD) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRWD reached a new 52-week high of $731.49 on May 29, 2026, closing up 8.94% amid pre-earnings momentum ahead of its June 3 report.
- HUBS posted Q1 2026 revenue of $881 million, up 23% year-over-year, and returned to profitability with $32.6 million in GAAP net income.
- Both stocks recorded double-digit gains on May 29, reflecting broad technology sector strength and AI-related positioning in recent market activity.
- CRWD operates in cybersecurity with a focus on AI-driven threat detection, while HUBS provides customer relationship management software emphasizing inbound marketing and sales automation.
- Recent analyst activity included multiple upward price target revisions for CRWD, while HUBS raised full-year 2026 guidance following its quarterly results.
- Market sentiment for both has been influenced by AI adoption trends, though sector exposure differs between defensive cybersecurity infrastructure and growth-oriented marketing technology.
Introduction
This comparison examines CRWD and HUBS to highlight differences in business models, recent performance patterns, and market positioning within the broader technology sector. Investors and traders focused on growth-oriented software companies, AI integration themes, and relative momentum may find the analysis relevant for evaluating trade-offs between cybersecurity infrastructure and customer experience platforms. The review draws on observable price behavior and reported fundamentals from recent weeks without projecting future outcomes.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CRWD, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc., provides cloud-based endpoint security and threat intelligence solutions. In recent weeks, the stock demonstrated notable strength, closing at $731.00 on May 29, 2026, after advancing 8.94% to a fresh 52-week high of $731.49. The move occurred ahead of the company’s Q1 fiscal 2027 earnings release scheduled for June 3. Broader market activity around AI security applications contributed to positive sentiment, with multiple analysts raising price targets during the period. Earlier fiscal 2026 results, reported in March, showed annual recurring revenue reaching $5.25 billion.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HUBS, HubSpot, Inc., delivers cloud-based customer relationship management and inbound marketing software. The company reported Q1 2026 results on May 7, with revenue of $881 million, representing 23% year-over-year growth, and a return to GAAP net income of $32.6 million. In recent weeks, the stock rose 10.98% on May 29 to close at $220.63. The company also raised full-year 2026 guidance and continued share repurchases, with positive market response noted in subsequent trading sessions amid AI platform enhancements.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. Bots in the platform feature varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical statistics covering win rates, drawdowns, and returns that can span wide ranges depending on the specific bot and market environment. Readers interested in exploring these options can visit the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRWD and HUBS operate in distinct segments of the software industry. CRWD focuses on cybersecurity infrastructure with recurring revenue tied to enterprise threat protection, while HUBS emphasizes customer experience tools for marketing and sales teams. Recent momentum favored both, though CRWD exhibited sharper single-day appreciation tied to pre-earnings positioning. Risk factors differ: CRWD faces competition in a high-stakes security environment, whereas HUBS contends with cyclical marketing spend. Sector exposure places CRWD in defensive technology and HUBS in growth software, with market sentiment reflecting AI tailwinds for each in recent activity.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, recent price stability, and positioning around earnings catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of favorable relative performance to CRWD over the near term compared with HUBS. This assessment reflects measurable momentum differentials in recent market data rather than definitive forecasts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Buy and HUBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.12% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | HUBS | CRWD / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 174B | 9.62B | 1,808% |
| EBITDA | 329M | 267M | 123% |
| Gain YTD | 45.661 | -53.157 | -86% |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 98.94 | 773% |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 3.3B | 154% |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 1.69B | 269% |
| Total Debt | 821M | 247M | 332% |
CRWD | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 65 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBS's Valuation (78) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (92) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (65) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -1.26% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 67% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
| HUBS - CRWD | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||