Advertisement
CRWD vs HUBS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRWD has demonstrated stronger recent momentum, gaining approximately 15% over the past month amid positive cybersecurity sector sentiment.
- HUBS experienced a roughly 2% decline in the same period, reflecting broader SaaS (Software as a Service) sector pressures, though it saw a recent uptick.
- CRWD's market cap stands at about $119 billion, dwarfing HUBS's $12.3 billion, highlighting scale differences in cybersecurity versus CRM (Customer Relationship Management).
- Recent CRWD earnings beat estimates with ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue) reaching $5.25 billion, up 24% year-over-year.
- HUBS faces AI-related competitive headwinds but benefits from analyst optimism ahead of earnings.
- Year-to-date, CRWD is up 2.8% while HUBS is down 37.3%, underscoring divergent tech subsector trends.
Introduction
This comparison pits CRWD, a leader in cloud-native cybersecurity, against HUBS, a provider of inbound marketing and CRM software. Both operate in the high-growth software sector but serve distinct needs: endpoint protection for CRWD and customer engagement tools for HUBS. Tech investors and traders navigating volatile markets may find value in assessing their relative performance, valuation trade-offs, and exposure to AI-driven trends. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in momentum and sentiment, aiding decisions on portfolio positioning or short-term trades.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) delivers endpoint and cloud workload protection via its Falcon platform, leveraging AI for threat detection. In recent market activity, the stock has climbed around 15% over the past month, trading near $470 with a market cap exceeding $119 billion. This follows fiscal 2026 Q4 results in early March, where revenues hit $1.31 billion (up 23.6% year-over-year) and ARR reached a record $5.25 billion, with net new ARR growing 47%. Positive sentiment stems from recognition as a Gartner Magic Quadrant leader in cyberthreat intelligence and AI security partnerships, boosting shares amid broader cybersecurity demand. Year-to-date gains of 2.8% lag the S&P 500 but reflect stability post-earnings.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot (HUBS) offers an integrated platform for marketing, sales, and service, targeting small to mid-sized businesses with inbound methodologies. Shares have traded around $240 lately, with a $12.3 billion market cap, down sharply from a 52-week high of $683. Recent weeks saw a modest 2% monthly dip overall, though punctuated by an 8% single-day gain amid SaaS recovery signals. Performance reflects year-to-date losses of 37.3%, pressured by AI disruptions in software and valuation concerns, despite profitability with EPS (Earnings Per Share) of $0.86 TTM. Analyst adjustments, like Citi's price target cut to $321, coincide with upcoming earnings expectations, fostering cautious optimism in a beaten-down sector.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23% to +162%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with timeframes like 5-minute to 60-minute charts and styles ranging from trend-following with fundamental analysis to risk-managed virtual agents using take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%). They trade sectors like semiconductors, industrials, AI infrastructure, and volatility plays, offering varied risk profiles and drawdowns from $1,500 to $49,000. Explore these high-performing bots to align with current market conditions and enhance your trading edge.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRWD focuses on cybersecurity with a subscription-heavy model (high ARR growth), contrasting HUBS's CRM ecosystem emphasizing customer acquisition. Growth drivers differ: CRWD benefits from escalating cyber threats and AI integration, while HUBS relies on SaaS expansion amid AI pricing shifts. Recent momentum favors CRWD (YTD +2.8% vs. -37.3%), with superior analyst targets averaging $492 versus HUBS' $345. Risk factors include CRWD's premium valuation (forward P/E ~94) and negative EPS, versus HUBS' profitability but higher beta (1.23). Both expose to tech volatility, but cybersecurity sentiment outpaces CRM amid AI security hype.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CRWD due to consistent upward trends in recent weeks, robust ARR catalysts, and leadership in high-demand cybersecurity. Relative stability and analyst upgrades position it favorably over HUBS' recovery uncertainties, though both warrant monitoring for sector shifts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +15.56% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -22.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.76%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +94.06%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Jun 03, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.33% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (+0.53% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | HUBS | CRWD / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 138B | 9.8B | 1,408% |
| EBITDA | 182M | 267M | 68% |
| Gain YTD | 15.680 | -52.320 | -30% |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 100.71 | 760% |
| Revenue | 4.81B | 3.3B | 146% |
| Total Cash | 5.23B | 1.69B | 309% |
| Total Debt | 820M | 247M | 332% |
CRWD | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 34 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBS's Valuation (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (85) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (92) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 9 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DARP | 58.59 | 1.35 | +2.35% |
| Grizzle Growth ETF | |||
| FPF | 18.42 | 0.03 | +0.16% |
| FIRST TRUST INTERMEDIATE DURATION PREFERRED & Income FUND | |||
| DDFO | 22.29 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Innovator Eq Dual Drctnl 15 Buf ETFOct | |||
| ACEI | 24.48 | -0.04 | -0.14% |
| Innovator Equity Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | |||
| AFIF | 9.40 | -0.02 | -0.21% |
| Anfield Universal Fixed Income ETF | |||
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | +2.75% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 74% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 71% Closely correlated | +2.78% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| HUBS - CRWD | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.04% | ||
| ADSK - CRWD | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.45% | ||
More | ||||