DHT
Price
$17.65
Change
-$0.43 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.84B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NAT
Price
$5.85
Change
-$0.41 (-6.55%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TK
Price
$10.75
Change
-$0.35 (-3.15%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
935.38M
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DHT or NAT or TK

DHT vs NAT vs TK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? DHT Holdings (DHT) vs. Nordic American Tankers (NAT) vs. Teekay Corporation Ltd. (TK) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • All three companies operate in the crude oil tanker segment, with exposure to global shipping rates, oil demand, and geopolitical factors affecting freight markets.
  • DHT reported a significant earnings beat in Q1 2026, contributing to strong year-to-date stock performance relative to broader market benchmarks.
  • NAT has delivered robust year-to-date and one-year returns, supported by its fleet of double-hull tankers and dividend focus.
  • TK has shown solid year-to-date gains amid its marine transportation operations, though with more modest recent momentum compared to peers in the group.
  • Valuation sensitivity to spot tanker rates and contract coverage remains a key differentiator, with each stock exhibiting varying levels of dividend yields and balance sheet strength.
  • Sector sentiment in recent weeks has been influenced by fluctuating oil prices and supply dynamics, leading to mixed but generally positive relative performance across the tanker group.

Introduction

Investors and traders seeking exposure to the maritime energy transportation sector often evaluate tanker companies for their sensitivity to global oil flows and freight rates. DHT, NAT, and TK represent established players in this niche, each with distinct fleet profiles and operational focuses. This comparison examines their recent market positioning, performance trends, and key business attributes to assist those assessing relative opportunities within the energy midstream space. The analysis draws on observable data from recent market activity to highlight contrasts relevant to portfolio construction or tactical trading decisions.

DHT Overview and Recent Performance

DHT Holdings, Inc. owns and operates a fleet of very large crude carriers (VLCCs) that transport crude oil internationally. In recent weeks, the stock has reflected positive sentiment following a strong Q1 2026 earnings report that exceeded analyst expectations on both earnings per share and revenue. Broader market activity has shown the shares maintaining upward momentum year-to-date, supported by favorable tanker rate environments and effective fleet utilization. Factors influencing performance include sustained demand for long-haul crude transport and the company’s technical management capabilities, which have contributed to operational stability amid fluctuating energy markets.

NAT Overview and Recent Performance

Nordic American Tankers Limited owns and charters double-hull tankers, primarily in the Suezmax segment, with operations spanning international routes. Recent market activity has featured resilient stock performance, with notable year-to-date gains driven by consistent charter activity and a focus on dividend distributions. Sentiment in recent weeks has been shaped by the company’s fleet modernization efforts and exposure to spot market opportunities, which have aligned with broader tanker sector dynamics. Performance has remained competitive relative to peers, reflecting steady operational execution in a volatile freight rate landscape.

TK Overview and Recent Performance

Teekay Corporation Ltd. provides international crude oil marine transportation and related marine services through its fleet and offshore capabilities. In recent market activity, the stock has posted solid year-to-date returns, benefiting from its diversified service offerings and established market presence. Recent weeks have seen relatively stable trading influenced by contract coverage levels and overall energy transportation demand. The company’s positioning has supported consistent performance, though with sensitivity to broader industry cycles affecting marine logistics and storage solutions.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that cover thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, including consistent trend capture and risk-adjusted metrics, earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, allowing users to review detailed backtested results and ticker-specific suitability. This resource provides traders with data-driven insights into automated strategies applicable across various market environments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business models differ in fleet composition and service scope: DHT emphasizes VLCC-scale operations for long-haul crude, NAT focuses on Suezmax double-hull tankers with dividend emphasis, and TK incorporates broader marine services alongside transportation. Growth drivers center on spot versus time-charter exposure, with each showing varying sensitivity to oil price volatility and global trade routes. Recent momentum has favored DHT following its earnings beat, while NAT and TK have maintained steadier trajectories. Risk factors include freight rate cyclicality and regulatory changes in shipping, with valuation multiples reflecting differing dividend yields and leverage profiles. Market sentiment in the tanker sector remains tied to supply-demand imbalances, creating trade-offs between stability and upside potential across the three.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, relative price stability, and sector positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a probabilistic preference to DHT due to its demonstrated earnings outperformance and sustained momentum. However, outcomes remain contingent on evolving freight rates and macroeconomic variables, with no single stock exhibiting clear dominance across all metrics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2026
Stock price -- (DHT: $17.65NAT: $5.85TK: $10.75)
Brand notoriety: DHT and NAT are notable and TK is not notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DHT: 302%, NAT: 218%, TK: 312%
Market capitalization -- DHT: $2.84B, NAT: $1.24B, TK: $935.38M
$DHT is valued at $2.84B, while NAT has a market capitalization of $1.24B, and TK's market capitalization is $935.38M. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Pipelines ranges from $122.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry is $16.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DHT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and TK’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DHT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NAT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, DHT and TK are a better buy in the long-term than NAT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DHT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and TK’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DHT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NAT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NAT is a better buy in the short-term than DHT, which in turn is a better option than TK.

Price Growth

DHT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -6.56% price change this week, while NAT (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was 0.00% , and TK (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price fluctuated -9.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

DHT is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

NAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 31, 2026.

TK is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-1.00% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DHT($2.84B) has a higher market cap than NAT($1.24B) and TK($935M). NAT has higher P/E ratio than TK and DHT: NAT (24.01) vs TK (10.95) and DHT (9.60). NAT YTD gains are higher at: 82.917 vs. DHT (53.561) and TK (28.695). DHT and TK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 450M and 437M vs. NAT (90.6M). TK has less debt than NAT and DHT: TK (46.4M) vs NAT (424M) and DHT (506M). TK has higher revenues than DHT and NAT: TK (950M) vs DHT (566M) and NAT (331M).
DHTNATTK
Capitalization2.84B1.24B935M
EBITDA450M90.6M437M
Gain YTD53.56182.91728.695
P/E Ratio9.6024.0110.95
Revenue566M331M950M
Total Cash126MN/AN/A
Total Debt506M424M46.4M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DHT vs NAT vs TK: Fundamental Ratings
DHT
NAT
TK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91862
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51910
SMR RATING
1..100
346759
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
413648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
612113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DHT's Valuation (7) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (7) and is in the same range as TK (23). This means that DHT's stock grew similarly to NAT’s and similarly to TK’s over the last 12 months.

DHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TK (10) and is in the same range as NAT (19). This means that DHT's stock grew similarly to TK’s and similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.

DHT's SMR Rating (34) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as TK (59) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NAT (67). This means that DHT's stock grew similarly to TK’s and somewhat faster than NAT’s over the last 12 months.

NAT's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as DHT (41) and is in the same range as TK (48). This means that NAT's stock grew similarly to DHT’s and similarly to TK’s over the last 12 months.

TK's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (21) and is somewhat better than the same rating for DHT (61). This means that TK's stock grew similarly to NAT’s and somewhat faster than DHT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DHTNATTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DHT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RWMBX64.460.18
+0.28%
American Funds Washington Mutual R2
UOPIX162.93N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraNASDAQ-100 Inv
FSOPX20.06N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series Small Cap Opps
DRESX30.09N/A
N/A
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Gr
ANVRX10.44-0.04
-0.38%
American Century Non-US Intrs Val R

DHT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DHT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DHT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DHT
1D Price
Change %
DHT100%
-2.38%
FRO - DHT
85%
Closely correlated
-7.67%
TNK - DHT
81%
Closely correlated
-3.26%
INSW - DHT
79%
Closely correlated
-2.43%
TEN - DHT
75%
Closely correlated
-2.55%
NAT - DHT
72%
Closely correlated
-6.55%
More

NAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NAT has been closely correlated with FRO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NAT jumps, then FRO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NAT
1D Price
Change %
NAT100%
-6.55%
FRO - NAT
75%
Closely correlated
-7.67%
TNK - NAT
75%
Closely correlated
-3.26%
DHT - NAT
74%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
ECO - NAT
73%
Closely correlated
-3.86%
INSW - NAT
73%
Closely correlated
-2.43%
More

TK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TK has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TK jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TK
1D Price
Change %
TK100%
-3.15%
TNK - TK
85%
Closely correlated
-3.26%
INSW - TK
77%
Closely correlated
-2.43%
FRO - TK
74%
Closely correlated
-7.67%
DHT - TK
72%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
TEN - TK
70%
Closely correlated
-2.55%
More