ENTG
Price
$168.23
Change
-$15.77 (-8.57%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.62B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GFS
Price
$83.37
Change
-$6.30 (-7.03%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
45.76B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LRCX
Price
$371.15
Change
-$38.39 (-9.37%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
464.37B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENTG or GFS or LRCX

ENTG vs GFS vs LRCX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) vs. GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) vs. Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • GlobalFoundries (GFS) leads year-to-date (YTD) performance at +85.88%, outpacing ENTG (+69.15%) and LRCX (+50.10%), fueled by semiconductor recovery signals.
  • ENTG surged approximately 25% in recent weeks following a Q1 earnings beat driven by AI demand in advanced logic and memory.
  • LRCX, the largest by market cap at $321B, reported strong quarterly results with revenue up 23.8% year-over-year, supported by analyst upgrades.
  • GFS shares rose nearly 49% over the recent month amid anticipation for Q1 earnings and growth in aerospace, automotive, and defense sectors.
  • All three benefit from AI-driven semiconductor demand but face valuation pressures, with ENTG's P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) highest at 81.78 versus GFS (40.82) and LRCX (48.51).

Introduction

Entegris (ENTG), GlobalFoundries (GFS), and Lam Research (LRCX) operate within the semiconductor ecosystem, supplying critical materials, manufacturing capacity, and fabrication equipment. This comparison is relevant for investors tracking the AI-fueled chip sector rally, where demand for advanced nodes drives relative performance. Traders seeking exposure to supply chain leaders amid market volatility will find insights into momentum, valuations, and catalysts shaping these stocks' trajectories in recent market activity.

ENTG Overview and Recent Performance

Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) specializes in advanced materials and process solutions for semiconductor manufacturing, serving high-tech industries with products like filters and deposition materials. With a market cap of $21.7B, the company reported strong Q1 2026 results in recent weeks, exceeding earnings expectations on surging demand for AI-related advanced logic and memory chips. Shares rallied over 25% in the past month, reflecting improved margins and a new CFO appointment, though elevated inventory levels tempered some optimism. Positive analyst updates, including raised price targets to $205, have bolstered sentiment amid broader sector tailwinds.

GFS Overview and Recent Performance

GlobalFoundries Inc. (GFS) is a pure-play semiconductor foundry, manufacturing chips for clients in automotive, aerospace, defense, and communications. Its $35.6B market cap underscores its scale in essential semiconductor production. In recent market activity, GFS shares climbed nearly 49% over the past month and 86% YTD, driven by signals of broad-based recoveries and upcoming Q1 earnings expectations of $0.35 EPS. Diversification beyond consumer electronics into resilient sectors has supported momentum, with analysts maintaining neutral ratings but lifting targets to $49.

LRCX Overview and Recent Performance

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) provides wafer fabrication equipment, including etch and deposition tools vital for semiconductor production, with a dominant $321B market cap. Recent quarterly results beat estimates, with EPS of $1.47 and revenue growth of 23.8%, propelling shares higher despite China exposure risks. The stock has gained steadily YTD at 50%, supported by analyst upgrades like JP Morgan's overweight rating and $315 target. Broader AI infrastructure demand continues to influence positive sentiment in recent weeks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top performers from 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Selected for excelling in current volatility, these bots showcase annualized returns from +23% to +163%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors up to 11.70. Strategies vary widely—momentum in semiconductors like NVDA, dip-buying industrials, trend-following small caps, and volatility plays on leveraged ETFs—with timeframes from 5 minutes to 49 days. Ideal for copy trading, they offer real-time signals, risk management, and customizable portfolios tailored to sectors like AI and data centers. Explore these bots to align automated strategies with market conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ENTG focuses on upstream materials, providing stability but higher sensitivity to capex cycles; GFS as a foundry offers capacity for diverse applications like auto/defense, contrasting LRCX's equipment dominance in etch/deposition for leading-edge nodes. Growth drivers center on AI chip demand, with GFS showing strongest recent momentum (49% monthly gain) versus LRCX's steadier profile. Risks include geopolitical tensions for all, amplified for LRCX via China sales. Valuation-wise, ENTG's lofty P/E signals growth premium, while GFS trades more reasonably. Market sentiment favors equipment and foundry plays amid recovery, with LRCX benefiting from scale.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI leans toward LRCX in the current environment, given its market leadership, consistent earnings beats, superior EPS trajectory, and analyst backing amid AI catalysts. While GFS exhibits superior short-term momentum and ENTG post-earnings upside, LRCX's stability and positioning offer higher probability of sustained outperformance relative to peers.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ENTG: $184.00GFS: $89.67LRCX: $409.54)
Brand notoriety: ENTG and GFS are not notable and LRCX is notable
ENTG and LRCX are part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and GFS is in the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENTG: 116%, GFS: 72%, LRCX: 139%
Market capitalization -- ENTG: $28.02B, GFS: $49.2B, LRCX: $512.16B
$ENTG [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $28.02B. $LRCX’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $ $512.16B. $GFS [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $ $49.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $ $732.93B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $5.05T to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $ $80.79B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $205.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENTG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and LRCX’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).

  • ENTG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LRCX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRCX is a better buy in the long-term than ENTG and GFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENTG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and LRCX’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENTG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LRCX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ENTG is a better buy in the short-term than GFS and LRCX.

Price Growth

ENTG (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +12.96% price change this week, while GFS (@Semiconductors) price change was +6.78% , and LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) price fluctuated +5.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +129.72%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

ENTG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

GFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

LRCX is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.28% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (-0.05% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRCX($464B) has a higher market cap than GFS($45.8B) and ENTG($25.6B). ENTG has higher P/E ratio than LRCX and GFS: ENTG (106.36) vs LRCX (77.42) and GFS (51.10). GFS YTD gains are higher at: 156.787 vs. LRCX (139.701) and ENTG (118.730). LRCX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.07B vs. GFS (2.26B) and ENTG (848M). GFS has more cash in the bank: 3.07B vs. LRCX (1.68B) and ENTG (443M). GFS has less debt than LRCX and ENTG: GFS (1.72B) vs LRCX (3.73B) and ENTG (3.76B). LRCX has higher revenues than GFS and ENTG: LRCX (21.7B) vs GFS (6.84B) and ENTG (3.24B).
ENTGGFSLRCX
Capitalization25.6B45.8B464B
EBITDA848M2.26B8.07B
Gain YTD118.730156.787139.701
P/E Ratio106.3651.1077.42
Revenue3.24B6.84B21.7B
Total Cash443M3.07B1.68B
Total Debt3.76B1.72B3.73B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ENTG vs LRCX: Fundamental Ratings
ENTG
LRCX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3241
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
552
SMR RATING
1..100
8117
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ENTG's Valuation (72) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as LRCX (89). This means that ENTG’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.

LRCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENTG (55). This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

LRCX's SMR Rating (17) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENTG (81). This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

LRCX's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ENTG (35). This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

LRCX's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ENTG (5). This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to ENTG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENTGGFSLRCX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENTG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LRCX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSA320.222.10
+0.66%
Public Storage
NUTX150.05-0.46
-0.31%
Nutex Health Inc.
G28.11-0.14
-0.50%
Genpact Limited
FABC3.46-0.24
-6.49%
Fabric.AI Inc.
LFMD4.31-0.44
-9.26%
LifeMD

ENTG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENTG has been closely correlated with LSCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENTG jumps, then LSCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENTG
1D Price
Change %
ENTG100%
+2.93%
LSCC - ENTG
78%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
NXPI - ENTG
77%
Closely correlated
+3.18%
MCHP - ENTG
77%
Closely correlated
+2.95%
ON - ENTG
76%
Closely correlated
+8.16%
SLAB - ENTG
76%
Closely correlated
+0.00%
More

GFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFS has been closely correlated with KLIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GFS jumps, then KLIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFS
1D Price
Change %
GFS100%
+4.47%
KLIC - GFS
72%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
FORM - GFS
69%
Closely correlated
+4.75%
ENTG - GFS
67%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
LRCX - GFS
66%
Loosely correlated
+5.27%
VECO - GFS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
More

LRCX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCX
1D Price
Change %
LRCX100%
+5.27%
AMAT - LRCX
88%
Closely correlated
+3.74%
KLAC - LRCX
86%
Closely correlated
+3.70%
NVMI - LRCX
82%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
ASML - LRCX
81%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
RMBS - LRCX
80%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
More