Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. (FND), The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) and Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (LOW) are the three largest U.S. home‑improvement retailers. Comparing them helps DIY‑oriented investors, professional traders tracking consumer‑cycle exposure, and quantitative analysts evaluating sector‑wide momentum. Recent earnings releases, supply‑chain updates, and macro‑economic shifts have produced divergent price moves, making a side‑by‑side snapshot valuable for short‑term positioning and longer‑term thematic analysis.
Floor & Decor operates roughly 270 warehouse‑format stores and a handful of design studios, focusing on hard‑surface flooring and related accessories. In the past several weeks, FND posted earnings that missed consensus estimates, driven by slower consumer spend on discretionary home upgrades and a modest inventory buildup. The company’s revenue grew modestly year‑over‑year, but EPS (earnings per share) fell, prompting analysts to lower price targets to the high‑$50 range. The stock has slipped about 4‑5% relative to the S&P 500, reflecting heightened sensitivity to housing‑affordability concerns. Balance‑sheet metrics show a debt‑to‑equity ratio near 0.8, ample cash of roughly $300 million, and a P/E (price‑to‑earnings) around 26, indicating that valuation remains premium relative to peers.
The Home Depot, the sector’s market‑cap leader, generated $38.2 billion in revenue for its most recent quarter, with net income up to $2.7 billion. Earnings per share beat expectations, supported by sustained professional‑contractor demand and incremental same‑store sales. The company announced a modest dividend increase and reaffirmed its 2026 guidance, though analysts note a slight slowdown in discretionary spend. The share price of HD has trended slightly lower (≈‑1% week‑over‑week) after a brief rally, but its forward P/E of about 21 suggests relative cheapness versus FND’s higher multiple. With over $1.4 billion in cash and a debt‑to‑equity ratio above 5 (reflecting extensive capital structure), HD’s liquidity remains robust, and its dividend yield sits near 2.9%.
Lowe’s runs more than 2,200 stores across North America and reported quarterly revenue of $26 billion, up modestly from the prior year. While top‑line growth was in line with forecasts, earnings fell short, driven by higher freight costs and a softer DIY demand environment. The stock of LOW has declined roughly 1‑2% over the past month, lagging the broader market. Valuation metrics place Lowe’s at a forward P/E near 22 and a price‑to‑sales ratio of about 1.9, situating it between HD’s low‑multiple profile and FND’s higher multiple. The company maintains a solid cash position of roughly $2 billion and a debt‑to‑equity ratio near 5, comparable to HD, which supports its ongoing dividend of about 1.3%.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most effective AI‑driven trading bots from a library of hundreds that cover thousands of tickers. The platform evaluates bots on criteria such as win‑rate, average trade duration, risk‑adjusted return, and alignment with current market volatility. Only the bots that demonstrate consistent performance across recent market regimes are featured, offering a mix of momentum, mean‑reversion, and multi‑timeframe strategies. Traders can explore bots that specialize in large‑cap retail, like HD and LOW, or more niche players such as FND. For those interested in algorithmic execution, the curated list provides a practical entry point to leverage AI insights without building models from scratch.
Based on recent trend consistency, balance‑sheet depth, and forward‑looking earnings guidance, Tickeron’s AI algorithm currently leans toward HD as the most favorable of the three. The model weights steady cash flow, dividend yield, and a comparatively low forward P/E, which together suggest a higher probability of short‑term upside and lower downside risk. However, the AI assigns a probabilistic weight, not a guarantee, and acknowledges that sector‑wide headwinds could shift momentum toward FND or LOW if consumer‑spending dynamics change.
“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and LOW’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FND’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HD’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and LOW’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FND (@Home Improvement Chains) experienced а +1.50% price change this week, while HD (@Home Improvement Chains) price change was +4.90% , and LOW (@Home Improvement Chains) price fluctuated +3.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Improvement Chains industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.00%.
FND is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
HD is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.
LOW is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.
The home improvement chains industry sells home improvement merchandise and do-it-yourself repair and building goods. Customers include individual contractors or construction managers on one hand; on the other hand, there are retail consumers who’d either buy raw materials/items from the store to do a project on their own, or pay extra for installation services. Products sold include fencing supplies, lumber materials, hardware, lighting fixtures, plumbing supplies, home decor items, bathroom remodel items, roofing materials, tools and wallboard to name a few. The Home Depot Inc., Lowe’s Companies, Inc. and Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. are some of the biggest home improvement retailing companies in the U.S. Allowing all types of customers the flexibility to choose or buy products both offline and online and then having the products shipped to the respective sites/homes are some of the potential drivers of a home improvement chain’s popularity. Many big-box home improvement chains are looking to expand their overseas presence. Supply-chain efficiency and distribution management are some of the key ingredients to grow/make profit in this industry.
| FND | HD | LOW | |
| Capitalization | 5.41B | 327B | 122B |
| EBITDA | 509M | 25.1B | 12.6B |
| Gain YTD | -17.753 | -3.475 | -9.067 |
| P/E Ratio | 27.22 | 23.26 | 18.37 |
| Revenue | 4.68B | 167B | 88.4B |
| Total Cash | 294M | 1.6B | 786M |
| Total Debt | 2.01B | 63.2B | 42.5B |
FND | HD | LOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 31 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 69 Overvalued | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 71 | 64 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 11 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 52 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 53 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LOW's Valuation (4) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (65) and is somewhat better than the same rating for HD (69). This means that LOW's stock grew somewhat faster than FND’s and somewhat faster than HD’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as HD (71) and is somewhat better than the same rating for FND (100). This means that LOW's stock grew similarly to HD’s and somewhat faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's SMR Rating (4) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as HD (11) and is significantly better than the same rating for FND (100). This means that LOW's stock grew similarly to HD’s and significantly faster than FND’s over the last 12 months.
HD's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as FND (53) and is in the same range as LOW (59). This means that HD's stock grew similarly to FND’s and similarly to LOW’s over the last 12 months.
LOW's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Home Improvement Chains industry is in the same range as HD (53) and is in the same range as FND (80). This means that LOW's stock grew similarly to HD’s and similarly to FND’s over the last 12 months.
| FND | HD | LOW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 64% | 21 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 17 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HD has been closely correlated with LOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HD jumps, then LOW could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOW has been closely correlated with HD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOW jumps, then HD could also see price increases.