RL
Price
$366.55
Change
-$0.17 (-0.05%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
21.82B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHOO
Price
$44.03
Change
-$0.41 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.25B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VFC
Price
$16.59
Change
+$0.08 (+0.48%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.5B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RL or SHOO or VFC

Header iconRL vs SHOO vs VFC Comparison
Open Charts RL vs SHOO vs VFCBanner chart's image
RL vs SHOO vs VFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) vs. Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) vs. V.F. Corporation (VFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • RL’s premium‑branding gives it pricing power, but recent consumer‑spending weakness has pressured earnings.
  • SHOO benefits from fast‑fashion footwear trends and a solid dividend yield, yet its high PE suggests growth expectations are heavily priced in.
  • VFC’s diversified brand portfolio (Vans, The North Face, Timberland) cushions sector volatility, though its valuation remains modestly expensive.
  • All three stocks posted mixed performance over the past month, with RL down, VFC slightly lower, and SHOO modestly higher.
  • Tickeron’s AI trends favor the stock with the most stable earnings momentum and clear short‑term catalysts.

Introduction

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL), Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO), and V.F. Corporation (VFC) represent three distinct segments of the consumer‑discretionary apparel and footwear space. Investors who trade on brand equity, dividend yield, or multi‑brand diversification may find this comparative analysis useful for positioning within the current macro‑environment of subdued consumer confidence and shifting retail dynamics.

RL Overview and Recent Performance

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) is a global designer, marketer and distributor of premium lifestyle products, including apparel, accessories, home furnishings and fragrances. Over the recent weeks the stock has slipped roughly 4%‑5% from its 52‑week high of $393, reflecting softer demand for higher‑margin luxury items as discretionary spending tightens. The company reported fiscal Q4 2026 earnings on May 21, confirming a 12% year‑over‑year revenue increase driven by direct‑to‑consumer (DTC) channels, but margins contracted to 11.7% amid higher freight costs. Analysts cite the “Timeless by Design 2030” sustainability roadmap and a modest dividend of $0.9125 per share (≈1% yield) as supportive factors, while the elevated price‑to‑earnings (P/E) ratio of 25 and a beta of 1.48 signal higher volatility relative to the broader market.

SHOO Overview and Recent Performance

Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) designs, sources and markets fashion‑forward footwear and accessories. In the past month the stock has risen about 1.5% after reporting a 9% increase in Q3 2025 revenue, largely powered by strong sneaker and sandal sales in both wholesale and DTC segments. The company’s forward price‑to‑earnings (F/P‑E) of 15 and a trailing P/E of 59 reflect high growth expectations, while the dividend of $0.84 per share translates to a 2.3% yield—appealing to income‑seeking traders. Recent commentary highlights a new licensing partnership with a leading street‑wear influencer, which analysts view as a catalyst for expanding market share among younger consumers.

VFC Overview and Recent Performance

V.F. Corporation (VFC) owns a diversified portfolio of outdoor, active and work‑wear brands, including Vans, The North Face, Timberland, and Dickies. Over the last several weeks the share price has slipped roughly 2% from its $22 high, pressured by a cautious consumer outlook and a modest earnings guidance for FY 2026. The company posted Q3 2025 revenue of $2.88 billion, a slight increase versus the prior year, but net margins narrowed to 5.5% as promotional spend rose. VFC trades at a P/E of 33 and offers a dividend yield of 1.9%, positioning it between the higher‑valued RL and the more aggressively priced SHOO. Its beta of 0.97 suggests lower price swings compared with peers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform’s most effective AI trading bots. While Tickeron hosts hundreds of bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies—ranging from momentum‑based scalping to long‑term mean‑reversion—the Trending section highlights those with the strongest recent performance metrics, such as win rates above 60% and Sharpe ratios exceeding 1.2. Each bot is tailored to specific timeframes (intraday, swing, positional) and risk tolerances, providing traders with transparent statistics to match their preferred style. Exploring the Trending AI Robots can help investors identify algorithmic approaches that complement the market conditions discussed in this comparison.

Head-to-Head Comparison

  • Business Model: RL relies on premium branding and wholesale distribution; SHOO focuses on fast‑fashion footwear with a strong licensing component; VFC leverages a multi‑brand portfolio across outdoor, active and work segments.
  • Growth Drivers: RL’s DTC expansion and sustainability initiatives; SHOO’s influencer collaborations and sneaker trends; VFC’s brand diversification and international expansion, especially in emerging markets.
  • Recent Momentum: SHOO shows the only positive price action; RL and VFC have experienced modest declines due to broader consumer‑spending concerns.
  • Risk Factors: RL faces sensitivity to luxury‑spending cycles; SHOO carries valuation risk from a high P/E; VFC is exposed to supply‑chain cost pressures and brand‑specific inventory management.
  • Sector Exposure: All three sit in Consumer Discretionary, but RL and VFC have larger commodity‑related cost structures, while SHOO’s cost base is more flexible.
  • Valuation Sensitivity: RL’s P/E of 25 is near sector average; SHOO’s P/E of 60 reflects premium growth expectations; VFC’s P/E of 33 indicates moderate overvaluation relative to earnings.
  • Market Sentiment: Analyst consensus tilts neutral for RL, bullish for SHOO (driven by growth outlook), and mixed for VFC (balanced by brand strength versus earnings guidance).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trends, Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) as the most favorable of the trio. The stock exhibits the clearest short‑term upward momentum, a solid dividend yield, and a catalyst in its recent licensing partnership that could sustain sales growth. While RL and VFC possess strong brand assets, their recent price weakness and more modest near‑term catalysts reduce the AI’s confidence in a near‑term outperformance.

Disclaimer

“The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.” Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2026
Stock price -- (RL: $366.55SHOO: $44.03VFC: $16.59)
Brand notoriety: RL and SHOO are not notable and VFC is notable
RL and VFC are part of the Apparel/Footwear industry, and SHOO is in the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RL: 90%, SHOO: 90%, VFC: 76%
Market capitalization -- RL: $21.82B, SHOO: $3.22B, VFC: $6.5B
$RL [@Apparel/Footwear] is valued at $21.82B. $VFC’s [@Apparel/Footwear] market capitalization is $ $6.5B. $SHOO [@Wholesale Distributors] has a market capitalization of $ $3.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $ $27.62B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $ $63.65B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $ $3.02B. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $ $8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RL’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSHOO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and VFC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SHOO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RL is a better buy in the long-term than SHOO, which in turn is a better option than VFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHOO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and VFC’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHOO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RL is a better buy in the short-term than SHOO, which in turn is a better option than VFC.

Price Growth

RL (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while SHOO (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +1.36% , and VFC (@Apparel/Footwear) price fluctuated -3.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.49%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -4.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

RL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

SHOO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

VFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Apparel/Footwear (-3.39% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

@Wholesale Distributors (-4.21% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RL($21.8B) has a higher market cap than VFC($6.5B) and SHOO($3.25B). SHOO has higher P/E ratio than VFC and RL: SHOO (41.54) vs VFC (25.92) and RL (24.26). SHOO YTD gains are higher at: 6.386 vs. RL (3.944) and VFC (-7.760). RL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. VFC (847M) and SHOO (177M). SHOO has less debt than RL and VFC: SHOO (540M) vs RL (2.86B) and VFC (5.34B). VFC has higher revenues than RL and SHOO: VFC (9.58B) vs RL (7.83B) and SHOO (2.63B).
RLSHOOVFC
Capitalization21.8B3.25B6.5B
EBITDA1.43B177M847M
Gain YTD3.9446.386-7.760
P/E Ratio24.2641.5425.92
Revenue7.83B2.63B9.58B
Total CashN/A77.2M338M
Total Debt2.86B540M5.34B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RL vs SHOO vs VFC: Fundamental Ratings
RL
SHOO
VFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1784100
SMR RATING
1..100
297763
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
324059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48496
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHOO's Valuation (24) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as VFC (27) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (63) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that SHOO's stock grew similarly to VFC’s and somewhat faster than RL’s over the last 12 months.

RL's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHOO (84) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for VFC (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL's stock grew significantly faster than SHOO’s and significantly faster than VFC’s over the last 12 months.

RL's SMR Rating (29) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VFC (63) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SHOO (77) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL's stock grew somewhat faster than VFC’s and somewhat faster than SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

RL's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as SHOO (40) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is in the same range as VFC (59) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL's stock grew similarly to SHOO’s and similarly to VFC’s over the last 12 months.

SHOO's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (48) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for VFC (96) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that SHOO's stock grew somewhat faster than RL’s and significantly faster than VFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RLSHOOVFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIDA.X0.0233110.004882
+26.49%
Bonfida cryptocurrency
CAKE.X1.2150390.054149
+4.66%
PancakeSwap cryptocurrency
REQ.X0.0538730.000428
+0.80%
Request cryptocurrency
ACM.X0.3050780.001997
+0.66%
AC Milan Fan Token cryptocurrency
MFT.X0.000199N/A
+0.02%
Mainframe cryptocurrency

RL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RL has been loosely correlated with WWW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RL jumps, then WWW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RL
1D Price
Change %
RL100%
-0.05%
WWW - RL
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
ONON - RL
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
DECK - RL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
SHOO - RL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
BIRK - RL
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
More

SHOO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOO has been loosely correlated with OXM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHOO jumps, then OXM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHOO
1D Price
Change %
SHOO100%
-0.92%
OXM - SHOO
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
KTB - SHOO
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
COLM - SHOO
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
LEVI - SHOO
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAL - SHOO
58%
Loosely correlated
-12.95%
More