Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
May 26, 2025
The Portfolio Secrets of Warren Buffett: 21.7% Annualized Returns Since 1965

The Portfolio Secrets of Warren Buffett: 21.7% Annualized Returns Since 1965

As of May 26, 2025, Warren Buffett’s portfolio, managed through Berkshire Hathaway, has once again captured the attention of investors worldwide. With a total market value of $287.2 billion and an impressive annualized return of 27% since 1965, the portfolio’s composition—detailed in a recent Visualytiks chart sourced from the Securities & Exchange Commission—reveals Buffett’s strategic bets across various sectors. While his investment choices are a hot topic among retail and institutional investors alike, not everyone is rushing to replicate the Oracle of Omaha’s playbook. Let’s dive into the portfolio breakdown, explore why Buffett’s approach isn’t universally copied, and examine his historical outperformance, current strategy shifts, and how tools like Tickeron’s AI Agents can offer a diversified alternative.

A Glimpse into Buffett’s $287.2B Empire

Buffett’s portfolio is heavily concentrated in a few key sectors, reflecting his long-standing preference for stable, value-driven companies. The largest allocation is in Financials, valued at $103.0 billion, making up a significant portion of the portfolio. American Express AXP ($45.4B), Bank of America BAC ($28.2B), and Moody’s MCO ($12.1B) lead this category, alongside smaller stakes in Visa V ($3.0B), Chubb CB ($8.0B), Aon ($1.4B), and Ally Capital ($1.0B). This heavy weighting in financials underscores Buffett’s trust in the sector’s resilience and consistent cash flows.

The second-largest sector is Technology, with a $67.1B allocation, dominated by Apple at $63.4B. A smaller stake in VeriSign ($3.8B) rounds out this category. Apple’s outsized presence highlights Buffett’s rare but significant foray into tech, a sector his historically approached with caution.

Consumer Staples follow at $31.2B, led by Coca-Cola ($28.8B) and a smaller position in Constellation Brands ($2.3B). Buffett’s love for Coca-Cola, a long-term holding, reflects his preference for timeless brands with strong moats. In Energy, Chevron ($16.9B) and Occidental Petroleum ($11.4B) account for $28.3B, showing Buffett’s strategic bet on the energy sector amid fluctuating oil prices.

Industrials contribute $28.0B, with investments in Mitsubishi Corp. ($7.7B), Itochu Corp. ($7.1B), Mitsui & Co. ($5.8B), Marubeni ($3.0B), and Sumitomo ($1.9B)—a diversified play on global industrial giants. Consumer Defensive holdings, at $12.5B, include Kraft Heinz ($9.0B) and Kroger ($3.4B), while Healthcare ($9.4B) features Sirius XM ($2.7B) and Davita ($4.9B). Consumer Cyclical investments, such as Amazon ($2.1B) and Dominos ($1.3B), total $3.0B, and Communications ($5.8B) round out the portfolio.

Tickeron AI Agents: A Diversified Alternative
 

For investors wary of Buffett’s concentrated portfolio and cautious stance, Tickeron’s AI Trading Agents offer a dynamic, diversified approach to portfolio management. Powered by its Financial Language Model (FLM) framework, Tickeron’s platform uses Bull and Bear Agents to balance opportunity and risk across multiple asset classes, including stocks, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

  • Dynamic Diversification: Unlike Buffett’s concentrated bets, Tickeron’s AI Agents scan thousands of assets to identify high-probability opportunities, ensuring broader exposure. For example, while Buffett avoids speculative sectors, Tickeron’s Bull Agent might target AI stocks or crypto breakouts (like $ETH’s recent move past $4,000), diversifying beyond Buffett’s value-focused sectors.
  • Volatility-Adaptive Strategy: Tickeron’s agents adjust to market conditions in real-time. When the VIX spikes above 25, the Bear Agent increases hedges (e.g., shorting overvalued sectors), while the Bull Agent re-engages below a VIX of 20 to capture rallies. This adaptability contrasts with Buffett’s static, long-term holdings, offering retail investors a way to navigate volatility.

Backtested Performance: Tickeron’s framework is stress-tested across historical shocks, ensuring robustness in diverse market environments. By running Bull and Bear Agents in parallel, the platform maintains a market-neutral or tactically directional stance, reducing the concentration risk inherent in Buffett’s portfolio.
 

Why Everyone’s Talking About It

Buffett’s portfolio is a focal point for investors for several reasons. First, his track record at Berkshire Hathaway is legendary, with annualized returns of 27% since 1965, significantly outpacing the S&P 500’s average annual return of around 10% over the same period. On May 19, 2025, as retail investors poured a record $4.1 billion into U.S. stocks by 12:30 PM (according to JPMorgan), many looked to Buffett’s holdings for inspiration. His heavy weighting in Apple, for instance, aligns with retail enthusiasm for AI and tech stocks, a sector driving much of the recent $40B equity inflows in April. Similarly, his energy bets like Chevron resonate with the “reopening” rally in travel and industrials, another retail favorite.

Moreover, Buffett’s disciplined, value-oriented approach contrasts sharply with the speculative fervor of retail traders, who are fueled by commission-free apps, zero-interest margin loans, and social media hype. His portfolio offers a blueprint for stability in a volatile market, making it a natural talking point for those seeking to balance FOMO-driven trades with long-term thinking.


No One Has Been Better For Longer Than Buffett
 

Warren Buffett’s 21.7% annualized returns since 1965 at Berkshire Hathaway are unparalleled, making him one of the most successful investors in history. Compared to other investing legends, Buffett’s consistency over six decades stands out. Peter Lynch, who managed Fidelity’s Magellan Fund from 1977 to 1990, achieved a remarkable 29.2% annualized return, but his tenure was far shorter, spanning just 13 years. George Soros, known for his macro bets like shorting the British pound in 1992, delivered around 20% annualized returns over 30 years through his Quantum Fund, but his speculative style contrasts with Buffett’s value-driven approach. Carl Icahn, another notable investor, has averaged around 15-20% annually through activist investing, but his returns have been less consistent due to the high-risk nature of his strategies.

Buffett’s edge lies in his disciplined focus on buying undervalued companies with strong fundamentals and holding them for the long term. Unlike Lynch’s growth-oriented stock-picking, Soros’s currency and macro trades, or Icahn’s activist interventions, Buffett’s method avoids market timing and speculative bets, delivering steady outperformance through compounding. His ability to outperform across multiple market cycles—from the inflationary 1970s to the tech-driven 2010s—sets him apart as the gold standard in investing.

 

Buffett’s Outperformance Is Dwindling
 

Despite his historical success, Buffett’s outperformance has been narrowing in recent years. From 1965 to 2000, Berkshire Hathaway’s annualized returns often exceeded 30%, far outpacing the S&P 500. However, from 2010 to 2025, Berkshire’s annualized returns have dropped to around 12-15%, only slightly above the S&P 500’s 10-12% over the same period. This decline is partly due to the sheer size of Berkshire’s portfolio—$287.2B as of May 16, 2025—making it harder to find high-return opportunities that move the needle. Additionally, Buffett’s value-focused strategy has struggled in a market dominated by growth stocks, particularly in tech sectors like AI and biotech, which he largely avoids outside of Apple.

The rise of passive investing has also pressured active managers like Buffett. Low-cost index funds tracking the S&P 500 have delivered consistent returns with minimal fees, closing the gap with Berkshire’s performance. While Buffett still beats the market over the long term, his margin of outperformance has dwindled, raising questions about whether his approach remains as effective in today’s fast-evolving market.
 

Buffett Does Not Buy And Hold Forever
 

The perception that Buffett buys and holds forever is a myth. While he famously said his favorite holding period is “forever,” Buffett has sold positions when fundamentals deteriorate or better opportunities arise. For example, in 2020, he exited his stakes in major airlines like Delta and Southwest, citing a permanent shift in the industry due to the pandemic. More recently, in 2024, Buffett trimmed his Apple position by 10%, despite it being his largest holding, likely to rebalance his portfolio and raise cash. He also sold out of IBM in 2017 after years of underperformance, acknowledging his misjudgment on the tech giant’s turnaround potential.

Buffett’s willingness to sell reflects a pragmatic side to his philosophy. He holds onto winners like Coca-Cola and American Express for decades because their competitive moats remain intact, but he’s not afraid to cut losses or reallocate capital when the investment thesis changes. This flexibility is often overlooked by those who view Buffett as a rigid, buy-and-hold investor.
 

Buffett Is Currently Stacking Cash

As of May 26, 2025, Buffett is sitting on a record cash pile, with Berkshire Hathaway’s cash reserves estimated at $180 billion, up from $168 billion at the end of 2024. This significant cash hoard reflects Buffett’s cautious stance in the current market environment. At the 2025 Berkshire annual meeting, Buffett noted that he’s struggling to find attractive opportunities at today’s valuations, particularly with the S&P 500 trading at a forward P/E ratio of 22, well above its historical average of 15-17.


Buffett’s cash buildup is a defensive move, positioning Berkshire to capitalize on future market downturns or acquire businesses at better prices. It also signals his wariness of overvalued markets, especially in high-growth sectors where retail investors have been piling in, as seen with the $40B equity inflows in April 2025. While Buffett’s cash-heavy strategy may frustrate investors seeking immediate returns, it underscores his disciplined approach to capital allocation—waiting for the right pitch rather than swinging at every opportunity.
 

Buffett Has Sold More Than He’s Bought For 11 Straight Quarters


Adding to the narrative of caution, Buffett has been a net seller of stocks for 11 consecutive quarters as of Q1 2025. Since Q3 2022, Berkshire has sold $75 billion more in equities than it has bought, a stark contrast to its historical pattern of consistent buying. Notable sales include reductions in Apple, Bank of America, and HP, alongside complete exits from smaller positions like Paramount Global and Snowflake. These sales have contributed to Berkshire’s growing cash pile, as Buffett prioritizes liquidity over deploying capital in an overheated market.



This selling streak reflects Buffett’s belief that many stocks are overvalued in 2025, particularly amidst retail exuberance and speculative trends like AI stocks and crypto. While he remains confident in long-term holdings like Coca-Cola and American Express, his net selling activity suggests a defensive posture, preparing for potential market corrections or economic uncertainty.
 

For instance, on May 19, 2025, when retail investors poured $4.1 billion into U.S. stocks, Tickeron’s AI Agents could have diversified across tech, energy, and crypto, capturing upside while hedging against volatility—something Buffett’s concentrated portfolio isn’t designed to do. Visit Tickeron’s website to explore how its AI can enhance portfolio diversification.

 

A Lesson in Discipline, Not a Template


Warren Buffett’s $287.2B portfolio, with its 27% annualized returns since 1965, is a masterclass in disciplined, value-driven investing, which is why it’s the talk of the town as of May 26, 2025. His bets on Financials, Apple, and Consumer Staples resonate with some retail trends, but his approach—now marked by a dwindling outperformance, a cash-heavy stance, and net selling—doesn’t fully align with the speculative fervor driving record inflows. While investors admire Buffett’s strategy, not everyone copies it—nor should they. His concentrated, long-term holdings suit his unique position and goals, but for retail investors navigating a volatile market, a more diversified and dynamic approach, like that offered by Tickeron’s AI Agents, may better balance opportunity and risk.

Buffett’s portfolio remains a source of inspiration, but as his cash pile grows and outperformance narrows, it’s clear that one investor’s treasure map isn’t everyone’s path to gold.

Disclaimer: Investing involves significant risks. Always conduct thorough research and consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: AXP, BAC, V, MCO

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


AXP in downward trend: 10-day moving average crossed below 50-day moving average on August 19, 2026

The 10-day moving average for AXP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on August 19, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 17, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on AXP as a result. In of 74 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for AXP turned negative on July 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .

AXP moved below its 50-day moving average on August 17, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AXP declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 4 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

The 50-day moving average for AXP moved above the 200-day moving average on August 12, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AXP advanced for three days, in of 330 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .

AXP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 276 cases where AXP Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 75, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. AXP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.618) is normal, around the industry mean (4.367). P/E Ratio (20.388) is within average values for comparable stocks, (17.143). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.565) is also within normal values, averaging (2.035). Dividend Yield (0.010) settles around the average of (0.070) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.037) is also within normal values, averaging (5.973).

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are VISA (NYSE:V), Mastercard (NYSE:MA), American Express Company (NYSE:AXP), Capital One Financial (NYSE:COF), PayPal Holdings (NASDAQ:PYPL), Synchrony Financial (NYSE:SYF), SLM Corp (NASDAQ:SLM), Bread Financial Holdings (NYSE:BFH), LexinFintech Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ:LX).

Industry description

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Savings Banks Industry is 35.05B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1.6M to 698.09B. V holds the highest valuation in this group at 698.09B. The lowest valued company is DXF at 1.6M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Savings Banks Industry was -2%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was 3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 9%. SUIG experienced the highest price growth at 35%, while KLAR experienced the biggest fall at -31%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Savings Banks Industry was 25%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -29% and the average quarterly volume growth was -49%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 55
P/E Growth Rating: 63
Price Growth Rating: 53
SMR Rating: 49
Profit Risk Rating: 74
Seasonality Score: -31 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
AXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
Last 5 trading days
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a financial conglomerate

Industry SavingsBanks

Profile
Details
Industry
Financial Conglomerates
Address
200 Vesey Street
Phone
+1 212 640-2000
Employees
74600
Web
https://www.americanexpress.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
Quantum Computing Inc. completed a $110 million acquisition of Luminar Semiconductor on February 2, significantly strengthening its photonics and manufacturing capabilities. Shares have traded with elevated volatility, peaking near $12.70 in mid-January before retreating to the $9 range amid heavy volume.
ERII shares have remained resilient, trading near $15.47 ahead of Q4 and full-year 2025 earnings scheduled for February 25, 2026. Q3 2025 results exceeded expectations, with revenue of $32 million and EPS of $0.07, despite year-over-year declines tied to project timing.
Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) has experienced pronounced swings in recent weeks, touching multiyear lows before staging a sharp recovery. The stock continues to trade within a wide 52-week range, closely tied to the value of its Charter Communications stake and investor expectations around the proposed merger.
Apollo Global Management (APO), a leading alternative asset manager, reports Q4 and full-year 2025 results on February 9, 2026, before the market opens. The firm has delivered a year of strong growth, with AUM expanding on record inflows exceeding $200 billion and origination surpassing $300 billion.
Arm Holdings (ARM) shares have demonstrated resilience in recent sessions, rebounding after an initial earnings-related pullback and stabilizing near technical support levels. While smartphone-related headwinds tied to memory shortages pressured sentiment, momentum in AI-driven data center royalties helped restore confidence.
Shell plc (SHEL) reported Q4 2025 adjusted earnings of $3.3 billion, below expectations due to weaker oil prices and non-cash tax charges. Full-year adjusted earnings reached $18.5 billion, supported by strong LNG and upstream operations. A 4% dividend increase to $0.372 per share and a new $3.5 billion buyback program reinforce capital return commitments.
Linde (LIN) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $4.20, topping estimates, with full-year revenue reaching $34 billion. 2026 EPS guidance of $17.40–$17.90 implies 6–9% growth, supported by a record $10 billion project backlog.
ConocoPhillips (COP) reported Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.02, missing estimates due to weaker oil prices. Full-year adjusted earnings totaled $7.7 billion, with $19.9 billion in operating cash flow. Shares have gained more than 10% in recent weeks, supported by analyst upgrades and sector momentum.
Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has navigated recent market volatility while remaining within its 52-week range. Broader weakness in financial data and exchange operators has created short-term pressure, but ICE’s diversified business model continues to provide stability.
Verisk Analytics (VRSK) delivered Q4 2025 revenue of $779 million, up 5.9% year over year, with adjusted EPS of $1.82, beating expectations. Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH) reported Q3 FY2026 revenue of $2.62 billion, down 10.2% year over year, but adjusted diluted EPS climbed 14% to $1.77, well above estimates.
(OMC) Omnicom’s fourth-quarter report, released February 18, 2026, marked its first earnings update incorporating results from Interpublic Group (IPG), acquired on November 26, 2025. The combination created the world’s largest marketing services firm by revenue, a significant milestone as the advertising industry consolidates and adapts to digital transformation.
Copart (CPRT) is set to report fiscal Q2 2026 earnings on February 19, 2026, after market close. Consensus calls for EPS of $0.39–$0.40 and revenue of $1.15–$1.18 billion. Global Payments (GPN) posted Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $3.18, in line with expectations, and adjusted net revenue of $2.32 billion, up 6% in constant currency (excluding dispositions). Thomson Reuters (TRI) delivered Q4 2025 adjusted EPS of $1.07 and revenue of $2.01 billion, up 5% year over year, supported by recurring subscription growth.
Unilever PLC (UL) leads year-to-date performance with a 12.61% gain, ahead of Diageo plc (DEO) at 9.90% and Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) at 4.27%. DEO offers the highest dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with KDP (3.16%) and UL (2.97%). All three stocks carry low betas—DEO (0.18), UL (0.24), and KDP (0.35)—highlighting their defensive characteristics.
Q1 Fiscal 2026 Results: Revenue of $333M and adjusted EBITDA of $50M (15% margin), exceeding analyst expectations. FY2026 Guidance Raised: Adjusted EBITDA now projected at $225M, with revenue reaffirmed near $1.5B. EV Backlog Growth: 855 electric buses worth $277M, highlighting robust demand supported by EPA clean bus funding.
IBM fell over 10% today mainly because a new AI tool from Anthropic is seen as a direct threat to IBM’s lucrative COBOL modernization and consulting business, triggering worries that key legacy‑modernization revenue will be automated away.
Today’s drop is mainly about competitive positioning and future growth expectations, not an immediate collapse of current Wegovy/Ozempic sales, but it signals that Novo may not have the strongest next‑wave obesity drug versus Eli Lilly, which is why the stock sold off so sharply.
RNG (RingCentral) dropped over 12% today mainly as a sharp pullback after a very steep recent run‑up driven by upbeat Q4 results, guidance, and capital‑return news, with profit‑taking amplified by valuation concerns and a weak broader tech tap
Fundamentally, the latest public guidance is still for rapid growth and profitability, but today’s drop reflects a reset of sentiment and valuation rather than a brand‑new deterioration in those targets. For investors, the key question is whether the current price appropriately reflects execution risk, competition in diagnostics, and macro volatility after the guidance‑driven rally and subsequent reversal.
TNC (Tennant Company) is down more than 25% today because it reported a very large earnings and revenue miss for Q4 2025, blamed on serious ERP rollout problems and weaker demand, and guided to a slower‑than‑hoped recovery in 2026.
XMTR (Xometry) is down more than 21% today because, despite reporting record growth and an earnings beat, the company announced a CEO transition and investors used the news to take profits after a big prior run‑up, with heavy short interest amplifying the drop.