Go to the list of all blogs
Sergey Savastiouk's Avatar
published in Blogs
May 26, 2025
The Portfolio Secrets of Warren Buffett: 21.7% Annualized Returns Since 1965

The Portfolio Secrets of Warren Buffett: 21.7% Annualized Returns Since 1965

As of May 26, 2025, Warren Buffett’s portfolio, managed through Berkshire Hathaway, has once again captured the attention of investors worldwide. With a total market value of $287.2 billion and an impressive annualized return of 27% since 1965, the portfolio’s composition—detailed in a recent Visualytiks chart sourced from the Securities & Exchange Commission—reveals Buffett’s strategic bets across various sectors. While his investment choices are a hot topic among retail and institutional investors alike, not everyone is rushing to replicate the Oracle of Omaha’s playbook. Let’s dive into the portfolio breakdown, explore why Buffett’s approach isn’t universally copied, and examine his historical outperformance, current strategy shifts, and how tools like Tickeron’s AI Agents can offer a diversified alternative.

A Glimpse into Buffett’s $287.2B Empire

Buffett’s portfolio is heavily concentrated in a few key sectors, reflecting his long-standing preference for stable, value-driven companies. The largest allocation is in Financials, valued at $103.0 billion, making up a significant portion of the portfolio. American Express AXP ($45.4B), Bank of America BAC ($28.2B), and Moody’s MCO ($12.1B) lead this category, alongside smaller stakes in Visa V ($3.0B), Chubb CB ($8.0B), Aon ($1.4B), and Ally Capital ($1.0B). This heavy weighting in financials underscores Buffett’s trust in the sector’s resilience and consistent cash flows.

The second-largest sector is Technology, with a $67.1B allocation, dominated by Apple at $63.4B. A smaller stake in VeriSign ($3.8B) rounds out this category. Apple’s outsized presence highlights Buffett’s rare but significant foray into tech, a sector his historically approached with caution.

Consumer Staples follow at $31.2B, led by Coca-Cola ($28.8B) and a smaller position in Constellation Brands ($2.3B). Buffett’s love for Coca-Cola, a long-term holding, reflects his preference for timeless brands with strong moats. In Energy, Chevron ($16.9B) and Occidental Petroleum ($11.4B) account for $28.3B, showing Buffett’s strategic bet on the energy sector amid fluctuating oil prices.

Industrials contribute $28.0B, with investments in Mitsubishi Corp. ($7.7B), Itochu Corp. ($7.1B), Mitsui & Co. ($5.8B), Marubeni ($3.0B), and Sumitomo ($1.9B)—a diversified play on global industrial giants. Consumer Defensive holdings, at $12.5B, include Kraft Heinz ($9.0B) and Kroger ($3.4B), while Healthcare ($9.4B) features Sirius XM ($2.7B) and Davita ($4.9B). Consumer Cyclical investments, such as Amazon ($2.1B) and Dominos ($1.3B), total $3.0B, and Communications ($5.8B) round out the portfolio.

Tickeron AI Agents: A Diversified Alternative
 

For investors wary of Buffett’s concentrated portfolio and cautious stance, Tickeron’s AI Trading Agents offer a dynamic, diversified approach to portfolio management. Powered by its Financial Language Model (FLM) framework, Tickeron’s platform uses Bull and Bear Agents to balance opportunity and risk across multiple asset classes, including stocks, ETFs, and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum.

  • Dynamic Diversification: Unlike Buffett’s concentrated bets, Tickeron’s AI Agents scan thousands of assets to identify high-probability opportunities, ensuring broader exposure. For example, while Buffett avoids speculative sectors, Tickeron’s Bull Agent might target AI stocks or crypto breakouts (like $ETH’s recent move past $4,000), diversifying beyond Buffett’s value-focused sectors.
  • Volatility-Adaptive Strategy: Tickeron’s agents adjust to market conditions in real-time. When the VIX spikes above 25, the Bear Agent increases hedges (e.g., shorting overvalued sectors), while the Bull Agent re-engages below a VIX of 20 to capture rallies. This adaptability contrasts with Buffett’s static, long-term holdings, offering retail investors a way to navigate volatility.

Backtested Performance: Tickeron’s framework is stress-tested across historical shocks, ensuring robustness in diverse market environments. By running Bull and Bear Agents in parallel, the platform maintains a market-neutral or tactically directional stance, reducing the concentration risk inherent in Buffett’s portfolio.
 

Why Everyone’s Talking About It

Buffett’s portfolio is a focal point for investors for several reasons. First, his track record at Berkshire Hathaway is legendary, with annualized returns of 27% since 1965, significantly outpacing the S&P 500’s average annual return of around 10% over the same period. On May 19, 2025, as retail investors poured a record $4.1 billion into U.S. stocks by 12:30 PM (according to JPMorgan), many looked to Buffett’s holdings for inspiration. His heavy weighting in Apple, for instance, aligns with retail enthusiasm for AI and tech stocks, a sector driving much of the recent $40B equity inflows in April. Similarly, his energy bets like Chevron resonate with the “reopening” rally in travel and industrials, another retail favorite.

Moreover, Buffett’s disciplined, value-oriented approach contrasts sharply with the speculative fervor of retail traders, who are fueled by commission-free apps, zero-interest margin loans, and social media hype. His portfolio offers a blueprint for stability in a volatile market, making it a natural talking point for those seeking to balance FOMO-driven trades with long-term thinking.


No One Has Been Better For Longer Than Buffett
 

Warren Buffett’s 21.7% annualized returns since 1965 at Berkshire Hathaway are unparalleled, making him one of the most successful investors in history. Compared to other investing legends, Buffett’s consistency over six decades stands out. Peter Lynch, who managed Fidelity’s Magellan Fund from 1977 to 1990, achieved a remarkable 29.2% annualized return, but his tenure was far shorter, spanning just 13 years. George Soros, known for his macro bets like shorting the British pound in 1992, delivered around 20% annualized returns over 30 years through his Quantum Fund, but his speculative style contrasts with Buffett’s value-driven approach. Carl Icahn, another notable investor, has averaged around 15-20% annually through activist investing, but his returns have been less consistent due to the high-risk nature of his strategies.

Buffett’s edge lies in his disciplined focus on buying undervalued companies with strong fundamentals and holding them for the long term. Unlike Lynch’s growth-oriented stock-picking, Soros’s currency and macro trades, or Icahn’s activist interventions, Buffett’s method avoids market timing and speculative bets, delivering steady outperformance through compounding. His ability to outperform across multiple market cycles—from the inflationary 1970s to the tech-driven 2010s—sets him apart as the gold standard in investing.

 

Buffett’s Outperformance Is Dwindling
 

Despite his historical success, Buffett’s outperformance has been narrowing in recent years. From 1965 to 2000, Berkshire Hathaway’s annualized returns often exceeded 30%, far outpacing the S&P 500. However, from 2010 to 2025, Berkshire’s annualized returns have dropped to around 12-15%, only slightly above the S&P 500’s 10-12% over the same period. This decline is partly due to the sheer size of Berkshire’s portfolio—$287.2B as of May 16, 2025—making it harder to find high-return opportunities that move the needle. Additionally, Buffett’s value-focused strategy has struggled in a market dominated by growth stocks, particularly in tech sectors like AI and biotech, which he largely avoids outside of Apple.

The rise of passive investing has also pressured active managers like Buffett. Low-cost index funds tracking the S&P 500 have delivered consistent returns with minimal fees, closing the gap with Berkshire’s performance. While Buffett still beats the market over the long term, his margin of outperformance has dwindled, raising questions about whether his approach remains as effective in today’s fast-evolving market.
 

Buffett Does Not Buy And Hold Forever
 

The perception that Buffett buys and holds forever is a myth. While he famously said his favorite holding period is “forever,” Buffett has sold positions when fundamentals deteriorate or better opportunities arise. For example, in 2020, he exited his stakes in major airlines like Delta and Southwest, citing a permanent shift in the industry due to the pandemic. More recently, in 2024, Buffett trimmed his Apple position by 10%, despite it being his largest holding, likely to rebalance his portfolio and raise cash. He also sold out of IBM in 2017 after years of underperformance, acknowledging his misjudgment on the tech giant’s turnaround potential.

Buffett’s willingness to sell reflects a pragmatic side to his philosophy. He holds onto winners like Coca-Cola and American Express for decades because their competitive moats remain intact, but he’s not afraid to cut losses or reallocate capital when the investment thesis changes. This flexibility is often overlooked by those who view Buffett as a rigid, buy-and-hold investor.
 

Buffett Is Currently Stacking Cash

As of May 26, 2025, Buffett is sitting on a record cash pile, with Berkshire Hathaway’s cash reserves estimated at $180 billion, up from $168 billion at the end of 2024. This significant cash hoard reflects Buffett’s cautious stance in the current market environment. At the 2025 Berkshire annual meeting, Buffett noted that he’s struggling to find attractive opportunities at today’s valuations, particularly with the S&P 500 trading at a forward P/E ratio of 22, well above its historical average of 15-17.


Buffett’s cash buildup is a defensive move, positioning Berkshire to capitalize on future market downturns or acquire businesses at better prices. It also signals his wariness of overvalued markets, especially in high-growth sectors where retail investors have been piling in, as seen with the $40B equity inflows in April 2025. While Buffett’s cash-heavy strategy may frustrate investors seeking immediate returns, it underscores his disciplined approach to capital allocation—waiting for the right pitch rather than swinging at every opportunity.
 

Buffett Has Sold More Than He’s Bought For 11 Straight Quarters


Adding to the narrative of caution, Buffett has been a net seller of stocks for 11 consecutive quarters as of Q1 2025. Since Q3 2022, Berkshire has sold $75 billion more in equities than it has bought, a stark contrast to its historical pattern of consistent buying. Notable sales include reductions in Apple, Bank of America, and HP, alongside complete exits from smaller positions like Paramount Global and Snowflake. These sales have contributed to Berkshire’s growing cash pile, as Buffett prioritizes liquidity over deploying capital in an overheated market.



This selling streak reflects Buffett’s belief that many stocks are overvalued in 2025, particularly amidst retail exuberance and speculative trends like AI stocks and crypto. While he remains confident in long-term holdings like Coca-Cola and American Express, his net selling activity suggests a defensive posture, preparing for potential market corrections or economic uncertainty.
 

For instance, on May 19, 2025, when retail investors poured $4.1 billion into U.S. stocks, Tickeron’s AI Agents could have diversified across tech, energy, and crypto, capturing upside while hedging against volatility—something Buffett’s concentrated portfolio isn’t designed to do. Visit Tickeron’s website to explore how its AI can enhance portfolio diversification.

 

A Lesson in Discipline, Not a Template


Warren Buffett’s $287.2B portfolio, with its 27% annualized returns since 1965, is a masterclass in disciplined, value-driven investing, which is why it’s the talk of the town as of May 26, 2025. His bets on Financials, Apple, and Consumer Staples resonate with some retail trends, but his approach—now marked by a dwindling outperformance, a cash-heavy stance, and net selling—doesn’t fully align with the speculative fervor driving record inflows. While investors admire Buffett’s strategy, not everyone copies it—nor should they. His concentrated, long-term holdings suit his unique position and goals, but for retail investors navigating a volatile market, a more diversified and dynamic approach, like that offered by Tickeron’s AI Agents, may better balance opportunity and risk.

Buffett’s portfolio remains a source of inspiration, but as his cash pile grows and outperformance narrows, it’s clear that one investor’s treasure map isn’t everyone’s path to gold.

Disclaimer: Investing involves significant risks. Always conduct thorough research and consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Related Ticker: AXP, BAC, V, MCO

Contributor

Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.


AXP's RSI Indicator climbs out of oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for AXP moved out of oversold territory on October 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 20 of the 28 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 71%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 07, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on AXP as a result. In 47 of 74 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for AXP just turned positive on October 06, 2026. Looking at past instances where AXP's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

Following a +1.43% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where AXP advanced for three days, in 206 of 326 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

The 50-day moving average for AXP moved below the 200-day moving average on September 24, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where AXP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.

AXP broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for AXP entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. AXP’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 67 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (6.035) is normal, around the industry mean (3.945). P/E Ratio (18.588) is within average values for comparable stocks, (14.459). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.232) is also within normal values, averaging (3.918). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.050) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.824) is also within normal values, averaging (5.901).

Notable companies

The most notable companies in this group are VISA (NYSE:V), Mastercard (NYSE:MA), American Express Company (NYSE:AXP), Capital One Financial (NYSE:COF), PayPal Holdings (NASDAQ:PYPL), Synchrony Financial (NYSE:SYF), SLM Corp (NASDAQ:SLM), Bread Financial Holdings (NYSE:BFH), LexinFintech Holdings Ltd (NASDAQ:LX).

Industry description

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the Savings Banks Industry is 32.88B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1.59M to 690.38B. V holds the highest valuation in this group at 690.38B. The lowest valued company is DXF at 1.59M.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the Savings Banks Industry was -1%. For the same Industry, the average monthly price growth was -6%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5%. SEZL experienced the highest price growth at 18%, while YRD experienced the biggest fall at -41%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the Savings Banks Industry was -7%. For the same stocks of the Industry, the average monthly volume growth was -6% and the average quarterly volume growth was -52%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating: 51
P/E Growth Rating: 62
Price Growth Rating: 58
SMR Rating: 46
Profit Risk Rating: 77
Seasonality Score: 14 (-100 ... +100)
View a ticker or compare two or three
AXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
A.I.Advisor
published price charts
A.I. Advisor
published General Information

General Information

a financial conglomerate

Industry SavingsBanks

Industry
Financial Conglomerates
Address
200 Vesey Street
Phone
+1 212 640-2000
Employees
75100
Web
https://www.americanexpress.com
Interact to see
Advertisement
The Bitwise Solana Staking ETF (BSOL) advanced roughly 18% over the trailing 30 days, closely tracking a sharp rally in Solana (SOL). The move extends a broader recovery, with BSOL up approximately 77% over the past three months from its mid-2026 trough.
MSTY is an actively managed single-stock option income ETF (exchange-traded fund) that writes call options on Strategy (MSTR), formerly MicroStrategy, to generate current income. The portfolio is anchored by U.S. Treasury bills and MSTR option contracts rather than a diversified basket of equities, concentrating exposure in one volatile underlying.
AMDL has surged roughly +64% over the past 30 days, from about $47.59 to $78.10, mirroring a powerful rally in its sole underlying stock, AMD . The fund is a leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund) designed to deliver 2x the daily return of AMD, amplifying both gains and losses.
TSMX, a 2x daily leveraged single-stock ETF (exchange-traded fund), rose roughly +19% over the trailing 30 days, rebounding sharply from mid-September lows. The fund seeks 200% of the daily return of TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing), meaning its moves are roughly double the underlying stock's daily swings.
Contracted revenue anchor: A roughly $3.2 billion, seven-year LNG (liquefied natural gas) supply agreement with Puerto Rico has received final approval, providing multi-year cash-flow visibility if execution stays on track. Project pipeline inflection: Upcoming milestones include the Barcarena and PortoCem power plants in Brazil, a potential Gás Sul terminal restart, and optimization of the company's modular "Fast LNG" (FLNG) liquefaction fleet.
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) designs central processing units (CPUs), graphics processing units (GPUs), and AI accelerators, while LRCX (Lam Research) supplies the wafer-fabrication equipment used to build advanced chips. AMD has delivered strong double-digit revenue growth on AI data-center demand, but its shares trade with elevated expectations that can trigger sharp reactions around earnings.
Origination momentum: Velocity Financial enters 2026 off record annual originations of roughly $2.7 billion (up about 48%), positioning it to keep gaining share in a fragmented investor-loan market. Credit normalization is the central watch item: Nonperforming loans fell toward the 8.5% range of portfolio unpaid principal balance (UPB), but asset quality remains the primary swing factor for earnings.
Turnaround milestone ahead: Management has pointed to reaching cash generation in 2027, making the pace of cost discipline and margin recovery the central question for the stock forecast. Fresh capital supports execution: A recently announced $45.5 million equity financing, with participation from management and a single institutional investor, strengthens the balance sheet as the company funds its transformation.
NFE closed at $5.51, down -6.13% during Tuesday's regular session, extending a slide that has pushed shares near a 52-week low. Primary catalyst: the company disclosed its Fast LNG unit is offline after a gas-turbine mechanical failure, with return to service not expected until Q4.
The central $11 target is the arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, rounded from roughly $10.75. With the stock near $2.06, reaching $11 would require an upside of more than 400%, an extremely large move.
The $23 central target is the rounded arithmetic mean of four verified analyst price targets, which average $23.25. The latest verified price is around $9.57, meaning the target implies roughly 140% upside—a very large move.
NXH closed down -11.17% (-$0.23) to $1.83 on Oct 6, the most recent regular session, extending a steep two-day decline. Selling continued as investors digested the mutual termination of the Fathom Holdings merger and a dilutive $45.5M registered direct offering of ~16.5M shares at $2.76.
AMD is a large-cap designer of CPUs (central processing units) and GPUs (graphics processing units) competing directly with Nvidia in the AI accelerator market, while FORM is a small-cap provider of semiconductor test and measurement equipment, primarily probe cards. AMD's narrative has been driven by multi-billion-dollar hyperscaler deals, while FORM's has been powered by record revenue and sharp margin expansion tied to high-bandwidth memory (HBM) demand.
AMD has surged roughly 200% year to date, crossing a $1 trillion market capitalization on AI data-center demand and a "CPU renaissance" narrative. KLAC has gained about 71% year to date, supported by record process-control revenue and rapid growth in advanced packaging for AI chips.
AMD is a large-cap semiconductor designer riding explosive AI compute demand, while ENTG is a mid-cap supplier of materials and purity solutions that feed the same AI-driven chip cycle. AMD recently crossed a $1 trillion market capitalization on surging data center revenue, whereas ENTG operates at a far smaller scale (roughly $23 billion) with steadier, double-digit growth.
VELO closed Tuesday at $9.57, unchanged (+0.00%) from the prior session, with the move occurring during regular market hours. The flat close marked stabilization after Monday's -14.5% plunge, when shares fell to $9.57 from $11.20 following disclosure of CFO James Suva's departure.
The $8 target used here is a technical, publicly discussed recovery objective — not an analyst consensus — because legacy analyst price targets were set before NFE's restructuring and reverse stock split. New Fortress Energy Inc. ( NFE ) trades near $5.51, so reaching $8 implies a roughly 45% advance.
AVBP plunged -46.98% during Tuesday's regular session, closing at $15.09 versus $28.46, marking its worst single-day decline on record. The catalyst was the Phase 3 FURVENT trial of firmonertinib failing its primary endpoint—progression-free survival—in first-line EGFR exon 20 insertion non-small cell lung cancer.
Upcoming catalyst: The company's next earnings release is estimated for November 6, 2026, which should offer fresh detail on its SKY token holdings, staking rewards, and treasury strategy. Strategic positioning: SDEV is an on-chain holding company providing public-market exposure to the Sky protocol ecosystem, with SKY as its core digital asset and a stated focus on the stablecoin economy.
Different roles in the chip ecosystem: AMAT is a materials-engineering and deposition leader, while KLAC dominates process control, inspection, and yield management. Momentum favors AMAT: AMAT shares have more than doubled this year, while KLAC has recently pulled back roughly 9% in a month on margin and execution concerns.