Advertisement
AON vs MRSH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Aon (AON) vs. Marsh & McLennan (MRSH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Aon and Marsh & McLennan operate in the same insurance brokerage and risk management sector, facing similar macroeconomic influences on client demand and premium pricing.
- Both companies have demonstrated resilience in recent market activity, with performance tied to global economic conditions and insurance cycle dynamics.
- Aon emphasizes integrated risk solutions and consulting, while Marsh & McLennan focuses on risk, strategy, and people advisory across its Risk and Insurance Services and Consulting segments.
- Relative momentum has varied with broader market sentiment toward financial services, with neither stock showing consistent outperformance in recent weeks.
- Sector exposure to insurance and professional services exposes both to regulatory changes, interest rate movements, and client retention challenges.
- Market positioning highlights trade-offs between scale, geographic reach, and specialized service offerings for institutional investors evaluating peer comparisons.
Introduction
Professional services firms Aon and Marsh & McLennan represent two leading players in the global insurance brokerage and risk advisory space. Investors and traders comparing AON and MRSH often seek to understand relative performance within a competitive industry that benefits from recurring revenue streams and exposure to economic cycles. This analysis appeals to institutional portfolio managers, sector specialists, and active traders monitoring financial services equities for diversification or tactical allocation decisions in the current environment.
Aon Overview and Recent Performance
Aon plc provides risk management, insurance brokerage, and human capital consulting services worldwide. The company operates through Risk Solutions and Human Capital segments, serving clients across industries with data-driven advisory. In recent weeks, AON stock has reflected steady sector sentiment amid stable insurance market conditions, with performance influenced by client retention and expansion in emerging risk areas such as cyber and climate-related coverage. Broader market activity has supported consistent trading ranges without sharp volatility, as investors assess the firm’s scale advantages and integration of analytics platforms.
Marsh & McLennan Overview and Recent Performance
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. delivers risk, strategy, and people solutions globally, primarily through its Risk and Insurance Services and Consulting segments. Following its NYSE ticker change to MRSH earlier in the year, the company continues to leverage its established brand in insurance broking and actuarial services. Recent market activity has shown measured price behavior aligned with peer trends, driven by steady demand for risk consulting and resilience in core brokerage revenues. Sentiment remains tied to overall insurance pricing cycles and global client activity levels.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots display a range of historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics, allowing users to compare performance metrics across different trading styles. The section highlights bots with strong recent results in equities and other asset classes. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify options aligned with individual objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both firms share a business model centered on fee-based advisory and brokerage services, yet Aon tends to emphasize technology-enabled risk analytics while Marsh & McLennan maintains broader consulting capabilities in human capital and strategy. Growth drivers include organic client expansion and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity for both, though execution risks differ by integration track record. Recent momentum has been comparable, with performance reflecting shared sector tailwinds rather than company-specific catalysts. Risk factors encompass exposure to insurance rate cycles, regulatory scrutiny on broker compensation, and sensitivity to corporate spending. Market sentiment remains balanced, positioning the pair as close peers for investors evaluating relative valuation and operational leverage within insurance services.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning within the insurance brokerage sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest edge to AON due to its demonstrated stability in analytics-driven segments amid recent market activity. However, outcomes remain probabilistic and dependent on continued sector conditions, with MRSH offering comparable attributes that could shift the balance under different catalysts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AON is a StrongBuy and MRSH is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AON’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMRSH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MRSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AON’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRSH’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AON’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- MRSH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AON (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while MRSH (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +4.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.29%.
Reported Earning Dates
AON is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
MRSH is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Insurance Brokers/Services (+0.90% weekly)Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| AON | MRSH | AON / MRSH | |
| Capitalization | 76.5B | 90.5B | 85% |
| EBITDA | 6.73B | 7.22B | 93% |
| Gain YTD | 2.662 | 3.880 | 69% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.88 | 23.16 | 86% |
| Revenue | 17.6B | 27.9B | 63% |
| Total Cash | 1.27B | 1.7B | 75% |
| Total Debt | 15.9B | 22.4B | 71% |
AON | MRSH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 96 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 38 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MRSH's Valuation (84) in the null industry is in the same range as AON (96) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew similarly to AON’s over the last 12 months.
AON's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (65) in the null industry. This means that AON’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
AON's SMR Rating (23) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (38) in the null industry. This means that AON’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
AON's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (45) in the null industry. This means that AON’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AON (85) in the Insurance Brokers Or Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than AON’s over the last 12 months.
| AON | MRSH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 49% | 6 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 42% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
AON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AON has been closely correlated with MRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AON jumps, then MRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AON | 100% | -1.64% | ||
| MRSH - AON | 82% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| AJG - AON | 77% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| BRO - AON | 75% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| WTW - AON | 72% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| ERIE - AON | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
More | ||||
MRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRSH has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MRSH jumps, then AON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSH | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| AON - MRSH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| AJG - MRSH | 77% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
| BRO - MRSH | 75% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| WTW - MRSH | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| ERIE - MRSH | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.58% | ||
More | ||||