Advertisement
MRSH vs WTW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) vs. Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both MRSH and WTW operate in the professional services sector focused on risk management, insurance broking, and consulting, exposing them to similar macroeconomic and regulatory influences.
- MRSH maintains a larger market capitalization and has demonstrated more consistent recent dividend growth alongside upcoming second-quarter earnings.
- WTW has shown relative underperformance year-to-date compared to broader indices, with recent activity including a new cyber insurance facility launch.
- Sector-wide factors such as organic revenue growth rates and margin expansion remain central to performance differentiation between the two.
- Market sentiment for both reflects caution amid broader economic uncertainties, with analyst price targets generally exceeding current trading levels.
- Relative positioning favors stability in established operations for MRSH, while WTW emphasizes specialized product expansions.
Introduction
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) represent two prominent players in the global professional services industry, specializing in risk advisory, insurance solutions, and human capital consulting. This comparison examines their business models, recent market performance, and relative positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating exposure within the insurance brokerage and consulting sectors. Market participants focused on defensive growth, dividend stability, or sector rotation may find the analysis relevant amid evolving economic conditions and earnings cycles.
MRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) provides advisory services and insurance solutions across risk, strategy, reinsurance, and management consulting through segments including Marsh and Guy Carpenter. In recent market activity, the stock has traded in a range reflecting broader sector dynamics, with year-to-date returns lagging the S&P 500. Key influences include preparations for second-quarter earnings scheduled for July 21, 2026, and a recent quarterly dividend increase to $0.99 per share. Sentiment has been supported by analyst price target upgrades, though overall performance remains tempered by macroeconomic factors affecting client spending in risk and consulting services.
WTW Overview and Recent Performance
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) delivers data-driven solutions in people, risk, and capital through advisory, broking, and specialized offerings. Recent market activity shows the shares trading below prior highs, with year-to-date and trailing returns underperforming major indices. Developments include the launch of the CyMax Facility for cyber insurance targeting SMEs in the EMEA region and confirmation of regular quarterly dividends. Performance has been shaped by organic growth metrics in risk and broking segments alongside adjustments in full-year outlooks amid competitive pricing and geopolitical factors.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots exhibit varied statistics, with some achieving win rates in the 60-80% range, profit factors above 1.5, and drawdowns managed below 20% depending on strategy and timeframe. These tools encompass diverse trading styles, including trend-following, mean-reversion, and momentum approaches across multiple timeframes and ticker sets. Traders can explore the full range to identify bots aligned with specific risk parameters and market views.
Head-to-Head Comparison
MRSH and WTW share exposure to the insurance brokerage and professional services sector, yet differ in scale and emphasis. MRSH operates with a larger footprint and broader consulting integration, supporting more stable revenue streams from established client relationships. WTW focuses on specialized data analytics and targeted product launches, such as cyber facilities, which introduce growth catalysts but also execution risks. Recent momentum favors MRSH through dividend actions and earnings anticipation, while WTW contends with noted underperformance and outlook refinements. Risk factors include regulatory changes in insurance markets for both, with MRSH potentially offering greater resilience via diversification and WTW presenting higher sensitivity to segment-specific growth targets. Market sentiment reflects cautious optimism tied to earnings visibility and margin trends.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, dividend stability, and positioning ahead of earnings, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to MRSH due to its scale and upcoming catalysts. WTW shows potential in specialized expansions but faces greater recent volatility in relative performance. This assessment draws from verifiable market data and does not constitute investment advice.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRSH is a StrongBuy and WTW is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MRSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WTW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MRSH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MRSH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- WTW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
MRSH (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а +3.89% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was +2.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
MRSH is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.
WTW is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Insurance Brokers/Services (-2.80% weekly)Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| MRSH | WTW | MRSH / WTW | |
| Capitalization | 87.5B | 27.9B | 314% |
| EBITDA | 7.16B | 2.72B | 263% |
| Gain YTD | -1.148 | -9.431 | 12% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.69 | 17.35 | 131% |
| Revenue | 27.5B | 9.9B | 278% |
| Total Cash | 1.61B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 22.5B | 6.91B | 326% |
MRSH | WTW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 29 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WTW's Valuation (78) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (85) in the null industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
WTW's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (69) in the null industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as WTW (45) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
WTW's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (53) in the null industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.
| MRSH | WTW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 42% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 39% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 5 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 52% |
Advertisement
WTW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTW has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WTW jumps, then AON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTW | 100% | +2.04% | ||
| AON - WTW | 75% Closely correlated | +2.92% | ||
| AJG - WTW | 73% Closely correlated | +3.22% | ||
| MRSH - WTW | 67% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| BRO - WTW | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| GSHD - WTW | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||