Advertisement
MRSH vs WTW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) vs. Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- WTW outperforms MRSH year-to-date with 11.65% gains compared to 7.34%.
- MRSH commands a larger market cap of $82 billion versus WTW's $27 billion, reflecting its scale in risk and insurance services.
- Both stocks trade near their 52-week lows amid sector pressures, but MRSH recently beat Q1 earnings expectations with 8% revenue growth.
- Analyst price targets indicate potential upside: MRSH to $203 (19%) and WTW around $362 (25%).
- WTW offers a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 17.79 versus MRSH's 21.27, suggesting better relative valuation.
- Recent developments highlight AI initiatives at both firms, positioning them for long-term growth in consulting and broking.
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of insurance brokerage and professional services, MRSH and WTW stand out as key players offering risk management, consulting, and broking solutions. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market performance, business drivers, and relative positioning amid evolving sector dynamics like AI integration and economic uncertainty. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors evaluating stability in financial services will find value in understanding contrasts in scale, valuation, and growth trajectories. With both stocks navigating broader market volatility, insights into their head-to-head metrics can inform portfolio decisions.
MRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) is a global leader in risk, strategy, and people advisory services, operating through Risk and Insurance Services and Consulting segments. It provides insurance broking, risk consulting, and health/wealth solutions to businesses and institutions worldwide. In recent market activity, MRSH shares have traded around $170, near the lower end of their 52-week range of $165-$236. Year-to-date gains stand at 7.34%, reflecting resilience despite three-month pressures. Sentiment has been bolstered by strong Q1 results announced in recent weeks, with revenue up 8% to $7.6 billion and adjusted EPS beating estimates at $3.29. Factors influencing performance include AI investments, margin expansion, leadership enhancements, and partnerships like Formula 1, offsetting rising costs and market challenges.
WTW Overview and Recent Performance
Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (WTW) delivers data-driven advisory, broking, and solutions in health, wealth, career, and risk areas. Its segments focus on pension consulting, insurance brokerage, and software for total rewards and capital management. Recently, WTW shares hover near $289, within a 52-week range of $274-$353. The stock has achieved stronger year-to-date returns of 11.65%, supported by steady volume and low beta of 0.63. Key developments in recent weeks include new leadership for enterprise AI strategy, launches like Digital Infrastructure Protector for data centers, and partnerships such as INEOS Grenadiers. Upcoming Q1 earnings are anticipated to show EPS growth, driving positive sentiment amid energy market insights and M&A activity.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from a library of 351 bots that collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. Only 25 bots earn a spot in this trending section, chosen for their suitability to current market conditions based on factors like volatility levels (low to high), timeframes (from 5-minute to 60-minute charts), and analysis types (technical or fundamental). These bots vary in styles—signal agents, virtual agents, and brokerage agents—offering win rates, profit factors, and average returns optimized for stocks, with performance stats highlighting real-time edge in dynamic environments. Investors can explore these high-conviction options to automate trading and capture trends efficiently.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both MRSH and WTW thrive in insurance brokerage and consulting, but MRSH differentiates through its larger scale and diversified consulting arm, generating $27.5 billion in trailing revenue versus WTW's $9.7 billion. Growth drivers contrast: MRSH leverages post-earnings momentum and Thrive cost savings targeting $400 million, while WTW emphasizes AI acceleration and product innovations like risk protectors. Recent momentum favors WTW with superior YTD returns, though MRSH leads one-year gains. Risk profiles are low (betas 0.75 and 0.63), but WTW offers better valuation at a lower P/E and higher ROE potential. Sector exposure ties them to financial services cyclicality, with sentiment shifting on earnings catalysts and macroeconomic risks.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI tools, scanning trends and patterns, would likely favor WTW in the current environment due to its stronger year-to-date momentum, attractive valuation metrics, and upcoming earnings catalyst. While MRSH demonstrates stability through recent beats and scale advantages, WTW's relative positioning and AI-focused initiatives align better with short-term trend consistency. This probabilistic edge supports monitoring WTW for potential outperformance, subject to market developments.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRSH is a StrongBuy and WTW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MRSH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWTW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- MRSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WTW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MRSH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MRSH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WTW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
MRSH (@Insurance Brokers/Services) experienced а -3.65% price change this week, while WTW (@Insurance Brokers/Services) price change was -1.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Insurance Brokers/Services industry was -1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -28.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
MRSH is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.
WTW is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Insurance Brokers/Services (-1.95% weekly)Insurance brokers sell, solicit, or negotiate insurance for compensation. General insurance brokers mostly cater to insurances on car, house etc. (versus life). Brokers are also often instrumental in helping small employers find health insurance, particularly in more competitive markets. Additionally, brokers may also provide risk assessments, insurance consulting services, insurance-related regulatory and legislative update services. Some of the major names in this industry include Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Aon plc and Verisk Analytics Inc.
| MRSH | WTW | MRSH / WTW | |
| Capitalization | 78.9B | 24.3B | 325% |
| EBITDA | 7.16B | 2.72B | 263% |
| Gain YTD | -12.807 | -22.778 | 56% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.02 | 14.85 | 135% |
| Revenue | 27.5B | 9.9B | 278% |
| Total Cash | 1.61B | 1.86B | 87% |
| Total Debt | 22.5B | 6.91B | 326% |
MRSH | WTW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 41 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WTW's Valuation (77) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (83) in the null industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as WTW (94) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as WTW (45) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew similarly to WTW’s over the last 12 months.
WTW's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MRSH (71) in the null industry. This means that WTW’s stock grew similarly to MRSH’s over the last 12 months.
MRSH's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTW (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTW’s over the last 12 months.
| MRSH | WTW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 50% | 7 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 39% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 50% |
Advertisement
MRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRSH has been closely correlated with AON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MRSH jumps, then AON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRSH | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| AON - MRSH | 78% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| AJG - MRSH | 73% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| BRO - MRSH | 70% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| WTW - MRSH | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| ERIE - MRSH | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.37% | ||
More | ||||
WTW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTW has been closely correlated with AJG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WTW jumps, then AJG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTW | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| AJG - WTW | 72% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| AON - WTW | 71% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| MRSH - WTW | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| BRO - WTW | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| GSHD - WTW | 44% Loosely correlated | +5.64% | ||
More | ||||