CG
Price
$45.75
Change
+$1.20 (+2.69%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
16.47B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NTRS
Price
$174.34
Change
+$3.59 (+2.10%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
32.26B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CG vs NTRS

Header iconCG vs NTRS Comparison
Open Charts CG vs NTRSBanner chart's image
CG vs NTRS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. NTRS commentary
Jun 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a StrongBuy and NTRS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2026
Stock price -- (CG: $45.75 vs. NTRS: $174.34)
Brand notoriety: CG and NTRS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 68% vs. NTRS: 85%
Market capitalization -- CG: $16.47B vs. NTRS: $32.26B
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.47B. NTRS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $32.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $160.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTRS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NTRS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NTRS is a better buy in the long-term than CG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NTRS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than NTRS.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +5.22% price change this week, while NTRS (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

NTRS is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.75% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTRS($32.3B) has a higher market cap than CG($16.5B). CG has higher P/E ratio than NTRS: CG (31.34) vs NTRS (18.26). NTRS YTD gains are higher at: 28.949 vs. CG (-21.529). NTRS (14.1B) and CG (14.6B) have identical debt. NTRS has higher revenues than CG: NTRS (8.35B) vs CG (2.9B).
CGNTRSCG / NTRS
Capitalization16.5B32.3B51%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-21.52928.949-74%
P/E Ratio31.3418.26172%
Revenue2.9B8.35B35%
Total CashN/A5.82B-
Total Debt14.6B14.1B104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs NTRS: Fundamental Ratings
CG
NTRS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7941
SMR RATING
1..100
7014
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6111
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1213
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (65) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as NTRS (72) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to NTRS’s over the last 12 months.

NTRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (79) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

NTRS's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (70) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

NTRS's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (61) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that NTRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as NTRS (13) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to NTRS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGNTRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NTRS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLI3.580.14
+4.07%
Standard Lithium Ltd
VNT29.270.60
+2.09%
Vontier Corp
THRY3.860.07
+1.85%
Thryv Holdings
EME823.0511.52
+1.42%
EMCOR Group
FGI6.08-0.23
-3.65%
FGI Industries Ltd

NTRS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTRS has been closely correlated with STT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTRS jumps, then STT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTRS
1D Price
Change %
NTRS100%
+2.10%
STT - NTRS
72%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
RJF - NTRS
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
AMP - NTRS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
BLK - NTRS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
CG - NTRS
51%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
More