CL
Price
$87.93
Change
-$0.52 (-0.59%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
74.02B
5 days until earnings call
KMB
Price
$127.38
Change
-$0.37 (-0.29%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
43.58B
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CL vs KMB

Header iconCL vs KMB Comparison
Open Charts CL vs KMBBanner chart's image
Colgate-Palmolive
Price$87.93
Change-$0.52 (-0.59%)
Volume$3.19M
Capitalization74.02B
Kimberly-Clark
Price$127.38
Change-$0.37 (-0.29%)
Volume$1.55M
Capitalization43.58B
CL vs KMB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CL vs. KMB commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CL is a Hold and KMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CL: $87.93 vs. KMB: $127.38)
Brand notoriety: CL: Notable vs. KMB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CL: 65% vs. KMB: 70%
Market capitalization -- CL: $74.02B vs. KMB: $43.58B
CL [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $74.02B. KMB’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $43.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CL and KMB are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMB is a better buy in the short-term than CL.

Price Growth

CL (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while KMB (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

CL is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

KMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+0.96% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CL($74B) has a higher market cap than KMB($43.6B). CL has higher P/E ratio than KMB: CL (32.15) vs KMB (24.72). KMB YTD gains are higher at: -1.003 vs. CL (-1.599). CL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.25B vs. KMB (3.07B). KMB has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. CL (966M). KMB has less debt than CL: KMB (8.11B) vs CL (9.06B). KMB (20.4B) and CL (19.5B) have equivalent revenues.
CLKMBCL / KMB
Capitalization74B43.6B170%
EBITDA4.25B3.07B138%
Gain YTD-1.599-1.003159%
P/E Ratio32.1524.72130%
Revenue19.5B20.4B96%
Total Cash966M1.09B88%
Total Debt9.06B8.11B112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CL vs KMB: Fundamental Ratings
CL
KMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3975
SMR RATING
1..100
710
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7775
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KMB's Valuation (35) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CL (81). This means that KMB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMB (75). This means that CL’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMB’s over the last 12 months.

CL's SMR Rating (7) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (10). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

CL's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (60). This means that CL’s stock grew similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.

KMB's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (77). This means that KMB’s stock grew similarly to CL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLKMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGRO88.000.50
+0.57%
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
MAGA52.120.27
+0.53%
Point Bridge America First ETF
JANT38.520.09
+0.24%
AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF
IHE69.270.02
+0.03%
iShares US Pharmaceuticals ETF
PBJL28.72N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Jul

KMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMB
1D Price
Change %
KMB100%
-0.29%
PG - KMB
75%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
CL - KMB
68%
Closely correlated
-0.59%
CHD - KMB
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
CLX - KMB
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
UL - KMB
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
More