It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePEP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CVX (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +2.57% price change this week, while PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +0.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.42%.
CVX is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.
Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.74% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
CVX | PEP | CVX / PEP | |
Capitalization | 293B | 241B | 122% |
EBITDA | 47.8B | 15.8B | 303% |
Gain YTD | -0.542 | -12.832 | 4% |
P/E Ratio | 14.00 | 26.37 | 53% |
Revenue | 197B | 91.5B | 215% |
Total Cash | 8.22B | 10B | 82% |
Total Debt | 20.8B | 44.7B | 47% |
CVX | PEP | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVX (79) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVX’s over the last 12 months.
CVX's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (73) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CVX’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (19) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVX (67) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that PEP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVX’s over the last 12 months.
CVX's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as PEP (63) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CVX’s stock grew similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
CVX's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (82) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CVX’s stock grew somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
CVX | PEP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 4 days ago41% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 4 days ago49% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago43% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago57% | 4 days ago39% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago40% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago60% | 25 days ago38% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago52% | 5 days ago42% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago54% | 4 days ago53% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago56% | 4 days ago46% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVX has been closely correlated with XOM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVX jumps, then XOM could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PEP | 100% | -0.05% | ||
KDP - PEP | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
KO - PEP | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
MNST - PEP | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
CCEP - PEP | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
FIZZ - PEP | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
More |