DK
Price
$63.20
Change
-$1.58 (-2.44%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.87B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MPC
Price
$309.24
Change
-$3.03 (-0.97%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
90.28B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DK vs MPC

DK vs MPC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Delek US Holdings (DK) vs. Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Scale difference is vast: MPC is the largest independent refiner in the United States with a market capitalization roughly 20-25 times that of DK, making these two downstream energy companies fundamentally different propositions despite operating in the same industry.
  • Profitability profiles diverge sharply: MPC generated approximately $12 billion in adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) and $4.0 billion in net income in 2025, while DK reported roughly $1.35 billion in adjusted EBITDA and a narrow full-year net loss, highlighting the contrasting earnings power.
  • Both benefit from improved refining conditions: Rising crack spreads — the difference between crude oil costs and refined product prices — have boosted refining margins across the sector in recent quarters, lifting results for both companies.
  • Midstream stability differentiates: MPC's majority stake in MPLX provides substantial, predictable cash distributions expected to total $2.8 billion annually, while DK's stake in Delek Logistics (DKL) is being gradually positioned for an economic separation that could unlock value but introduces uncertainty.
  • Capital return profiles vary significantly: MPC returned $4.5 billion to shareholders in 2025 through buybacks and dividends, while DK maintained a more modest capital return program alongside its debt management priorities.
  • Regulatory tailwinds favor DK disproportionately: DK has benefited substantially from Small Refinery Exemptions (SREs) granted by the EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), which reduced its Renewable Fuel Standard compliance costs by over $356 million in 2025 — a benefit that larger refiners like MPC cannot access to the same degree.

Introduction

Investors evaluating the downstream energy sector often find themselves weighing the trade-offs between scale, stability, and upside potential. This comparison between DK (Delek US Holdings) and MPC (Marathon Petroleum Corporation) captures that tension precisely. Both companies refine crude oil into gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, and other petroleum products, and both operate integrated midstream logistics networks. Yet the similarities largely end there. Marathon Petroleum dominates with a refining capacity exceeding 3 million barrels per day across multiple regions, while Delek US Holdings operates four refineries with a combined capacity of approximately 302,000 barrels per day in the southern United States. This stock comparison is relevant for traders seeking to understand relative performance, momentum, and positioning within the refining sector, as well as for longer-term investors evaluating risk exposure and growth trajectories in the energy market.

DK Overview and Recent Performance

Delek US Holdings is a diversified downstream energy company headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee, with operations spanning refining, logistics, and formerly retail segments. Its four refineries — located in Tyler and Big Spring, Texas; El Dorado, Arkansas; and Krotz Springs, Louisiana — serve markets primarily in the southern and mid-continent United States. Through its majority stake in DKL (Delek Logistics Partners), the company also benefits from crude oil gathering, transportation, and storage infrastructure heavily concentrated in the Permian Basin.

In recent quarters, DK has experienced a notable improvement in financial performance. The company's adjusted EBITDA surged to approximately $1.35 billion for the full year 2025, a dramatic increase from roughly $342 million in 2024, driven by stronger refining margins and significant regulatory relief. A pivotal development was the EPA's granting of Small Refinery Exemptions covering multiple past compliance periods, which reduced DK's cost of materials by approximately $356 million over the course of 2025. The company's Enterprise Optimization Plan (EOP), an internally-driven cost and efficiency initiative, has also exceeded expectations, with annual run-rate cash flow improvements reaching approximately $200 million. Despite these tailwinds, DK posted a narrow full-year 2025 net loss of approximately $23 million, reflecting the volatility inherent in its smaller-scale, regionally-concentrated operations. Market sentiment has been generally constructive in recent weeks, though the stock remains subject to the cyclical swings characteristic of independent refiners.

MPC Overview and Recent Performance

Marathon Petroleum Corporation, headquartered in Findlay, Ohio, is the largest independent petroleum refiner in the United States. The company operates an extensive network of refineries across the Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent, and West Coast regions with a total crude oil refining capacity exceeding 3 million barrels per day. MPC also holds a controlling interest in MPLX LP, a publicly traded master limited partnership that owns and operates midstream energy infrastructure including pipelines, processing plants, and fractionation facilities across key producing basins.

MPC's recent financial performance has demonstrated the resilience that scale affords. For the full year 2025, the company reported net income of $4.0 billion, or $13.22 per diluted share, with adjusted EBITDA reaching approximately $12.0 billion. The Refining & Marketing segment delivered $6.1 billion in segment adjusted EBITDA, supported by a 94% utilization rate and 105% margin capture — a measure of how effectively a refiner converts market crack spreads into realized profits. The Midstream segment contributed approximately $6.75 billion in adjusted EBITDA, with MPLX distributions to MPC expected to reach $2.8 billion annually. Marathon returned $4.5 billion to shareholders in 2025 through a combination of share repurchases (reducing shares outstanding by 6.5%) and dividends, and announced a 10% dividend increase during the third quarter. The company's emphasis on high-return capital projects — including the Galveston Bay distillate hydrotreater, Robinson product flexibility upgrades, and new Garyville feedstock optimization initiatives — reflects a long-term investment approach designed to sustain competitive advantages across market cycles.

Trending AI Robots

For traders interested in a data-driven approach to stocks like DK and MPC, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of different tickers, but only the most effective and timely strategies earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ diverse trading styles — ranging from swing trading and trend following to mean-reversion and breakout strategies — across varied timeframes and sets of tickers. Many of the featured bots display compelling performance metrics, with some demonstrating notable annualized returns, Sharpe ratios, and win rates that provide traders with quantifiable benchmarks. Each bot's statistics, trading history, and active positions are transparently displayed, allowing users to evaluate performance before making any decisions. Whether tracking momentum in refining stocks or scanning for opportunities across the broader market, the Trending AI Robots section provides a practical starting point for traders looking to incorporate algorithmic insights into their decision-making process.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most striking contrast between DK and MPC lies in their scale and the implications that flow from it. MPC processes roughly ten times the crude throughput of DK and operates across three distinct geographic regions, providing natural diversification against regional supply disruptions, weather events, or demand fluctuations. DK's four-refinery footprint, concentrated in Texas, Arkansas, and Louisiana, offers less geographic insulation. This concentration amplifies both positive and negative market movements — when Gulf Coast crack spreads widen, DK benefits disproportionately, but the inverse holds true during downturns.

On the midstream dimension, both companies derive significant value from their logistics subsidiaries, but the strategic approaches differ. MPC's MPLX generates stable, growing cash distributions that management expects will fully cover MPC's standalone capital spending and dividends — creating a self-funding structure that supports aggressive share buybacks. DK's DKL, while also performing well and recently raising guidance, is the subject of an ongoing economic separation strategy aimed at unlocking the value of DK's stake, a process that introduces execution risk alongside potential upside.

From a regulatory standpoint, DK has benefited enormously from Small Refinery Exemptions under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program. These exemptions, granted by the EPA for past compliance periods, reduced DK's cost of materials by approximately $356 million in 2025. MPC, as a large refiner, does not qualify for SREs and must meet its full Renewable Volume Obligations (RVOs) — the mandated blending requirements for renewable fuels — which represents a structural cost disadvantage relative to smaller competitors in this specific area.

Risk profiles also differ materially. DK carries higher leverage relative to its size, with consolidated net debt of approximately $2.6 billion as of year-end 2025, and its dividend, while yielding attractively, has drawn analyst scrutiny regarding coverage from earnings and free cash flow. MPC ended 2025 with $3.7 billion in cash and equivalents and no borrowings under its $5 billion revolving credit facility, underscoring a fortress-like balance sheet. The trade-off for investors is clear: DK offers higher potential upside tied to operational improvements, regulatory catalysts, and sum-of-the-parts value unlocking, while MPC provides stability, scale-driven margins, and a demonstrated commitment to returning capital to shareholders across all phases of the refining cycle.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, financial stability, and the durability of positive catalysts, Tickeron's AI-driven framework would likely favor MPC in the current market environment. Marathon Petroleum's combination of consistent profitability, a robust balance sheet, strong cash flow generation, and a midstream subsidiary that effectively self-funds dividend and capital spending creates a compelling profile for trend-following and stability-oriented algorithms. MPC's $12 billion in adjusted EBITDA, 105% margin capture, and $4.5 billion in capital returns during 2025 reflect an organization operating with predictability and discipline — qualities AI models tend to weight favorably. While DK's regulatory tailwinds and cost-cutting initiatives have driven an impressive turnaround, the company's narrower profitability, higher leverage, and greater sensitivity to regional refining conditions introduce volatility that AI systems typically assess as higher risk. That said, DK's momentum and discounted valuation relative to the sum of its parts could attract AI strategies oriented toward mean reversion or value catalysts. In a probabilistic framework, MPC appears to offer the more consistent risk-reward profile that algorithmic models would prioritize under current conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DK vs. MPC commentary
Jul 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DK is a Hold and MPC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (DK: $63.20 vs. MPC: $309.24)
Brand notoriety: DK: Not notable vs. MPC: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DK: 83% vs. MPC: 84%
Market capitalization -- DK: $3.87B vs. MPC: $90.28B
DK [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $3.87B. MPC’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $90.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $90.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $17.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMPC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MPC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MPC is a better buy in the long-term than DK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MPC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MPC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MPC is a better buy in the short-term than DK.

Price Growth

DK (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while MPC (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -1.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

DK is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

MPC is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (-1.05% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MPC($90.3B) has a higher market cap than DK($3.87B). DK has higher P/E ratio than MPC: DK (93.07) vs MPC (20.36). DK YTD gains are higher at: 115.697 vs. MPC (91.832). MPC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.4B vs. DK (730M). MPC has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. DK (624M). DK has less debt than MPC: DK (3.25B) vs MPC (34.3B). MPC has higher revenues than DK: MPC (135B) vs DK (10.7B).
DKMPCDK / MPC
Capitalization3.87B90.3B4%
EBITDA730M12.4B6%
Gain YTD115.69791.832126%
P/E Ratio93.0720.36457%
Revenue10.7B135B8%
Total Cash624M2.15B29%
Total Debt3.25B34.3B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DK vs MPC: Fundamental Ratings
DK
MPC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3338
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1913
SMR RATING
1..100
9935
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
265
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MPC's Valuation (73) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DK (94). This means that MPC’s stock grew similarly to DK’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DK (19). This means that MPC’s stock grew similarly to DK’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's SMR Rating (35) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DK (99). This means that MPC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DK’s over the last 12 months.

MPC's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DK (34). This means that MPC’s stock grew similarly to DK’s over the last 12 months.

DK's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MPC (65). This means that DK’s stock grew somewhat faster than MPC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DKMPC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MPC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGR213.836.76
+3.26%
Progressive Corp
ESTC58.681.35
+2.35%
Elastic NV
IFRX1.740.01
+0.58%
InflaRx NV
PLSM3.43-0.23
-6.28%
Pulsenmore Ltd.
THRM42.69-2.92
-6.40%
Gentherm

DK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DK has been closely correlated with PBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DK jumps, then PBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DK
1D Price
Change %
DK100%
-2.44%
PBF - DK
76%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
PARR - DK
76%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
DINO - DK
74%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
VLO - DK
73%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
CVI - DK
71%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More

MPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MPC has been closely correlated with VLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MPC jumps, then VLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MPC
1D Price
Change %
MPC100%
-0.97%
VLO - MPC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
PSX - MPC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
DINO - MPC
79%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
PBF - MPC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
DK - MPC
69%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
More