FIZZ
Price
$42.10
Change
-$0.15 (-0.36%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.94B
6 days until earnings call
MNST
Price
$62.02
Change
+$0.29 (+0.47%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
60.56B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FIZZ vs MNST

Header iconFIZZ vs MNST Comparison
Open Charts FIZZ vs MNSTBanner chart's image
National Beverage
Price$42.10
Change-$0.15 (-0.36%)
Volume$127.38K
Capitalization3.94B
Monster Beverage
Price$62.02
Change+$0.29 (+0.47%)
Volume$4.33M
Capitalization60.56B
FIZZ vs MNST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FIZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FIZZ vs. MNST commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIZZ is a StrongBuy and MNST is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FIZZ: $42.10 vs. MNST: $62.02)
Brand notoriety: FIZZ and MNST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FIZZ: 73% vs. MNST: 74%
Market capitalization -- FIZZ: $3.94B vs. MNST: $60.56B
FIZZ [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $3.94B. MNST’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $60.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $294.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $20.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FIZZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FIZZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the long-term than FIZZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FIZZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FIZZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MNST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNST is a better buy in the short-term than FIZZ.

Price Growth

FIZZ (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -6.17% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -3.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

FIZZ is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

MNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.39% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNST($60.6B) has a higher market cap than FIZZ($3.94B). MNST has higher P/E ratio than FIZZ: MNST (38.52) vs FIZZ (21.16). MNST YTD gains are higher at: 17.998 vs. FIZZ (-1.336). MNST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.16B vs. FIZZ (256M). MNST has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. FIZZ (194M). FIZZ has less debt than MNST: FIZZ (72.1M) vs MNST (199M). MNST has higher revenues than FIZZ: MNST (7.66B) vs FIZZ (1.2B).
FIZZMNSTFIZZ / MNST
Capitalization3.94B60.6B7%
EBITDA256M2.16B12%
Gain YTD-1.33617.998-7%
P/E Ratio21.1638.5255%
Revenue1.2B7.66B16%
Total Cash194M2.07B9%
Total Debt72.1M199M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FIZZ vs MNST: Fundamental Ratings
FIZZ
MNST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5674
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7031
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNST's Valuation (91) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (94). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FIZZ (70). This means that MNST’s stock grew somewhat faster than FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's SMR Rating (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (100). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (62). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as FIZZ (100). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to FIZZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FIZZMNST
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FIZZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UOCT37.970.06
+0.16%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buf ETF™ Oct
BEEX24.67N/A
N/A
BeeHive ETF
DFSV32.39-0.08
-0.25%
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
MUSQ29.34-0.09
-0.29%
MUSQ Global Music Industry Idx ETF
XRT85.31-0.78
-0.91%
SPDR® S&P Retail ETF

FIZZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIZZ has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIZZ jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIZZ
1D Price
Change %
FIZZ100%
-0.36%
PEP - FIZZ
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
KDP - FIZZ
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
MNST - FIZZ
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
KO - FIZZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
COCO - FIZZ
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
+0.47%
PEP - MNST
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.45%
KDP - MNST
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
KO - MNST
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
CCEP - MNST
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
CELH - MNST
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More