Advertisement
AME or PH or ZWS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? AMETEK, Inc. (AME) vs. Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) vs. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AME, PH, and ZWS operate in the industrials sector with exposure to technology solutions, motion and control technologies, and water management systems, respectively.
- Recent market activity shows varied price behavior, with PH trading at significantly higher absolute levels than AME and ZWS.
- All three companies are scheduled for or recently approached earnings releases, providing potential catalysts for sentiment shifts.
- Sector exposure differs notably: AME emphasizes differentiated electronic instruments and electromechanical devices, PH focuses on diversified industrial components, and ZWS centers on sustainable water infrastructure.
- Market capitalization ranges from mid-cap (ZWS) to large-cap (AME and PH), influencing liquidity and institutional interest profiles.
- Relative performance in recent weeks has been influenced by broader industrial sector dynamics and macroeconomic factors affecting capital spending.
Introduction
Investors and traders seeking exposure to the industrials sector often evaluate companies with complementary yet distinct business models. AMETEK, Inc. (AME), Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH), and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) represent different facets of industrial technology and infrastructure. This comparison examines their business contexts, recent stock behavior, and relative positioning in the current market environment. The analysis is relevant for those assessing sector allocation, diversification within industrials, or tactical opportunities based on observable trends and fundamentals.
AME Overview and Recent Performance
AMETEK, Inc. (AME) is a global provider of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices serving aerospace, medical, and industrial markets. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited steady trading near the upper end of its recent range, supported by consistent demand for its differentiated technology solutions. Broader market activity in the industrials space and anticipation surrounding upcoming earnings have contributed to sentiment. The company’s diversified end-market exposure has helped moderate volatility relative to more cyclical peers during periods of uneven capital expenditure trends.
PH Overview and Recent Performance
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) specializes in motion and control technologies across aerospace, industrial, and mobile equipment markets. Recent market activity has reflected the company’s scale and diversified portfolio, with the stock maintaining elevated absolute price levels amid ongoing integration of recent acquisitions. Industrial sector sentiment and expectations for fiscal results have shaped trading patterns in recent weeks. PH’s broad exposure to aftermarket and original equipment demand provides a buffer against short-term fluctuations in any single end market.
ZWS Overview and Recent Performance
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) delivers water management solutions focused on plumbing, drainage, and water safety products. In recent market activity, the stock has traded within a narrower range than larger-cap industrials peers, reflecting its mid-cap profile and pure-play focus on sustainable water infrastructure. Developments in municipal and commercial construction spending have influenced sentiment. The company’s emphasis on specification-driven products positions it to benefit from long-term trends in water conservation and infrastructure modernization.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots designed to navigate thousands of different tickers under varying market conditions. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots with diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers, only the most suitable for prevailing conditions earn placement in the Trending section. Available bots demonstrate a wide range of historical performance metrics and risk parameters, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific objectives. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and configuration details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models contrast sharply: AME centers on high-precision instruments and devices, PH on integrated motion-control systems, and ZWS on water infrastructure components. Growth drivers include technology differentiation for AME, aerospace and industrial aftermarket strength for PH, and regulatory-driven demand for water solutions at ZWS. Recent momentum has varied with each company’s earnings cadence and sector-specific capital spending patterns. Risk factors encompass end-market cyclicality for all three, with PH’s larger scale potentially offering greater resilience and ZWS facing higher sensitivity to construction activity. Valuation sensitivity appears influenced by growth visibility and margin profiles, while market sentiment reflects broader industrials rotation and macroeconomic signals. Sector exposure overlaps in industrials but diverges in end-use applications, creating distinct trade-offs for portfolio construction.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency across recent market activity, earnings visibility, and relative positioning within the industrials sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to PH. Its diversified revenue streams and scale may support more stable performance characteristics in the prevailing environment compared with the more specialized profiles of AME and ZWS. This assessment remains conditional on continued alignment of fundamentals and market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and ZWS’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- AME’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- ZWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZWS’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZWS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AME (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +4.94% price change this week, while PH (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +9.97% , and ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price fluctuated +1.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.32%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +2.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
AME is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
PH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+4.36% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Industrial Specialties (+2.47% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
| AME | PH | ZWS | |
| Capitalization | 58.2B | 135B | 8.53B |
| EBITDA | 2.36B | 5.63B | 471M |
| Gain YTD | 22.817 | 22.214 | 12.015 |
| P/E Ratio | 37.08 | 37.71 | 31.94 |
| Revenue | 7.6B | 21B | 1.79B |
| Total Cash | N/A | 476M | 365M |
| Total Debt | 2.18B | 9.58B | 550M |
AME | PH | ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 41 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 5 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | 39 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 24 | 11 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 21 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AME's Valuation (75) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as ZWS (76) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as PH (82) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that AME's stock grew similarly to ZWS’s and similarly to PH’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AME (13) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry, and is in the same range as ZWS (32) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that PH's stock grew similarly to AME’s and similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
PH's SMR Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as ZWS (52) in the Industrial Machinery industry, and is in the same range as AME (59) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that PH's stock grew similarly to ZWS’s and similarly to AME’s over the last 12 months.
PH's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AME (24) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that PH's stock grew similarly to AME’s and somewhat faster than ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
PH's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as AME (28) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (82) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that PH's stock grew similarly to AME’s and somewhat faster than ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
| AME | PH | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 71% | 5 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 46% | 20 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
AME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AME has been closely correlated with ROP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AME jumps, then ROP could also see price increases.
PH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PH has been closely correlated with IR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PH jumps, then IR could also see price increases.
ZWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | 100% | -1.74% | ||
| XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.27% | ||
More | ||||