Advertisement
AMPL or GTM or HUBS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) vs. ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) vs. HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AMPL delivered strong Q1 revenue growth of 17% year-over-year to $93.5 million, with annual recurring revenue (ARR) up 17%, though shares have shown volatility amid broader tech sector pressures.
- GTM reported robust Q1 profitability with earnings of $87.5 million on $310.2 million revenue, but recent sharp declines reflect market reactions to go-to-market challenges in sales intelligence.
- HUBS posted 23% revenue growth to $881 million in Q1, beating expectations, yet shares dropped significantly post-earnings due to valuation concerns and execution risks in pricing strategy.
- All three operate in the competitive software-as-a-service (SaaS) space focused on analytics, sales, and CRM, with positive YTD returns outperforming the S&P 500 in some metrics despite recent pullbacks.
- HUBS leads in market cap at $9.8 billion and scale, while AMPL and GTM offer smaller-cap exposure with higher volatility.
- Recent momentum favors AMPL's consistent ARR expansion, positioning it relatively stronger in trend stability.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines AMPL, GTM, and HUBS, three SaaS providers in digital analytics, go-to-market intelligence, and customer relationship management (CRM). These technology stocks have garnered attention for their AI-enhanced platforms amid shifting market sentiment toward software efficiency and growth. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors eyeing long-term SaaS trends will find value in their relative performance, recent earnings beats, and sector exposure. With recent quarterly results highlighting revenue acceleration despite stock volatility, this analysis aids in understanding their positioning in the current environment.
AMPL Overview and Recent Performance
Amplitude, Inc. (AMPL) operates an AI-powered digital analytics platform that analyzes customer behavior in digital products, offering tools like Amplitude Analytics for real-time insights, Session Replay for user journeys, and AI Agents for goals like conversion optimization. Headquartered in San Francisco, it follows a SaaS subscription model serving global clients. In recent market activity, AMPL shares traded around $6.38 with a market cap of $846 million. Q1 2026 revenue reached $93.5 million, up 17% year-over-year, with ARR at $374 million, also up 17%, driven by enterprise penetration and multiproduct adoption. YTD returns stand at about 45%, outperforming the S&P 500, though beta of 1.43 indicates heightened volatility. Sentiment has been influenced by AI feature expansions and steady sequential ARR growth amid tech sector fluctuations.
GTM Overview and Recent Performance
ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM) delivers a cloud-based go-to-market intelligence platform for sales, marketing, and recruiting, with products like ZoomInfo Copilot, Sales, and Talent providing lead scoring, buying signals, and engagement tools. Based in Vancouver, Washington, it targets enterprises to small businesses across industries. Recent trading saw shares around $3.94 after a sharp drop, with a $1.2 billion market cap and 52-week range of $3.91-$12.51. Q1 2026 revenue hit $310.2 million, with earnings of $87.5 million, reflecting operational strength. YTD returns approximate 61%, but recent weeks brought declines tied to broader SaaS pressures and execution in competitive sales tech. Performance reflects resilience in profitability alongside market sensitivity to growth deceleration signals.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) offers a comprehensive CRM platform including Marketing Hub for automation, Sales Hub for pipeline management, Service Hub for customer support, and AI-driven Breeze for insights and automation. Serving mid-market B2B firms from Cambridge, Massachusetts, it emphasizes integrated hubs for revenue operations. Shares recently traded near $191 with a $9.8 billion market cap. Q1 2026 revenue surged 23% to $881 million, beating estimates with raised guidance, yet post-earnings drop of about 20% occurred due to pricing changes and growth concerns. YTD returns near 52% outpace benchmarks, supported by AI enhancements, though valuation scrutiny tempers sentiment in recent volatility.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Out of 351 total bots, 25 trending ones are highlighted by AI analysis for their promise in current market conditions, focusing on momentum, sector rotation, technical and fundamental signals in stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots feature real-time signals with risk management, no minimum balance, and adaptability to volatility levels (low, medium, high). Past top performers have shown annualized returns up to 279%, win rates of 70-95%, and profit factors exceeding 3.0 in sectors like tech, energy, and semiconductors. Explore these bots to align automated trading with prevailing trends—visit Trending AI Robots for details.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AMPL, GTM, and HUBS share SaaS models in tech, emphasizing AI for analytics (AMPL), sales intelligence (GTM), and CRM (HUBS). Growth drivers include ARR expansion for AMPL (17%), profitability for GTM, and revenue scale for HUBS (23%). Recent momentum shows AMPL with steadier trends versus GTM and HUBS post-earnings drops. Risk factors: high betas (1.43 for AMPL), execution in competitive sales/CRM, and valuation sensitivity for larger HUBS. All expose to software demand, but AMPL and GTM trade at discounts, trading relative strength for scale trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward AMPL due to its consistent ARR growth, enterprise momentum, and relative stability in recent trends compared to GTM's sharp declines and HUBS' valuation pressures. Observable factors like 17% top-line acceleration and AI product catalysts suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, though all face SaaS sector risks.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and HUBS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMPL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and HUBS’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMPL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- GTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
AMPL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.30% price change this week, while GTM (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.04% , and HUBS (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +2.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMPL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
GTM is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.94% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| AMPL | GTM | HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 906M | 834M | 9.25B |
| EBITDA | -85.87M | 333M | 267M |
| Gain YTD | -40.976 | -72.173 | -54.964 |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 6.61 | 90.95 |
| Revenue | 357M | 1.25B | 3.3B |
| Total Cash | 182M | 175M | 1.69B |
| Total Debt | 10.1M | 1.57B | 247M |
GTM | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 28 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GTM's Valuation (62) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GTM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
GTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GTM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
GTM's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that GTM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Price Growth Rating (88) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as GTM (94) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to GTM’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as GTM (100) in the null industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to GTM’s over the last 12 months.
| AMPL | GTM | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 81% | N/A |
Advertisement
AMPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMPL has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMPL jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMPL | 100% | +2.63% | ||
| FRSH - AMPL | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| CLSK - AMPL | 60% Loosely correlated | -5.58% | ||
| PCOR - AMPL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| PATH - AMPL | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| RIOT - AMPL | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.43% | ||
More | ||||
GTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTM | 100% | +4.43% | ||
| COIN - GTM | 58% Loosely correlated | -5.10% | ||
| HUBS - GTM | 56% Loosely correlated | +4.29% | ||
| CLSK - GTM | 55% Loosely correlated | -5.58% | ||
| CRM - GTM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| DOCU - GTM | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.68% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | +4.29% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | +3.68% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
More | ||||