Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD), Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. (BSBR), and Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) represent three publicly traded financial services companies with significant exposure to the Brazilian market. This comparison examines their business profiles, recent price behavior, and relative positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating opportunities within the regional banking sector. The analysis is relevant for those monitoring Latin American equities, sector rotation strategies, or diversified portfolios with emerging market financial exposure.
Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) is one of Brazil’s largest banks, providing a wide range of retail, corporate, and investment banking services. In recent weeks, the stock has shown relatively stable trading patterns within the broader financial sector, with year-to-date gains outpacing some peers. Market activity has been influenced by domestic economic indicators and sector-wide responses to interest rate expectations. Sentiment remains tied to the company’s established franchise and asset quality metrics, contributing to consistent positioning among Brazilian banking stocks.
Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. (BSBR) operates as a major player in Brazilian retail and wholesale banking, offering products across consumer, SME, and corporate segments. Recent market activity included a significant price increase exceeding 12% on a single trading day in late July, reflecting heightened trading volume and potential catalyst-driven momentum. Over broader recent periods, performance has aligned with sector trends, with attention on the bank’s integration within the larger Santander group and its response to local credit demand.
Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) functions as a digital-first financial platform, delivering banking, investments, insurance, and related services primarily in Brazil. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in line with digital banking peers, exhibiting moderate price fluctuations amid evolving investor interest in fintech models. Performance has been shaped by the company’s expansion in digital channels and its positioning within the competitive Brazilian payments and lending landscape.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights select AI trading bots from a large library of hundreds that actively trade thousands of tickers across global markets. Only the strongest performers suited to prevailing conditions are featured in this curated section. Available bots span diverse styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many demonstrating varying win rates, drawdown profiles, and trade frequencies. This resource provides traders with data-driven options for automated execution. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) and Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A. (BSBR) maintain traditional branch-supported banking models with substantial scale, while Inter & Co, Inc. (INTR) emphasizes a digital platform approach that may offer different cost structures and growth avenues. Growth drivers for BBD and BSBR center on established customer bases and net interest income sensitivity, whereas INTR focuses on user acquisition and ecosystem expansion. Recent momentum has favored BSBR in short-term moves, contrasted by BBD’s steadier year-to-date trajectory. Risk factors include shared exposure to Brazilian regulatory and economic conditions, with valuation sensitivity varying by earnings multiples—BBD frequently appearing more conservatively valued. Market sentiment across the group reflects broader interest in Brazilian financial resilience, though digital players like INTR may attract additional attention during periods of technological adoption.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models would likely assign a probabilistic preference toward Banco Bradesco S.A. (BBD) for its demonstrated year-to-date stability and valuation characteristics within the peer group. This assessment remains conditional on continued alignment with broader sector and macroeconomic signals.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBSBR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and INTR’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BSBR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and INTR’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
BBD (@Regional Banks) experienced а -8.05% price change this week, while BSBR (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.69% , and INTR (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated -11.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.03%.
BBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
BSBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
INTR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BBD | BSBR | INTR | |
| Capitalization | 33.6B | 21.6B | 2.23B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -1.138 | 3.220 | -39.694 |
| P/E Ratio | 7.47 | 16.58 | 7.55 |
| Revenue | 121B | 49.5B | 9B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total Debt | N/A | 31.7B | 15.8B |
BBD | BSBR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 26 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 3 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBD's Valuation (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BSBR (14) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBD’s stock grew similarly to BSBR’s over the last 12 months.
BSBR's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (95) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSBR’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BSBR's SMR Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (3) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSBR’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BSBR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSBR’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BSBR's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (67) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BSBR’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
| BBD | BSBR | INTR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | 11 days ago 66% | 9 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RIOX | 26.86 | 0.23 | +0.84% |
| Tidal Trust II Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RIOT ETF | |||
| BYRE | 27.29 | 0.19 | +0.72% |
| Principal Real Estate Active Opp ETF | |||
| TBF | 25.47 | 0.08 | +0.32% |
| ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | |||
| VRIG | 25.09 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grd ETF | |||
| MORT | 9.89 | -0.02 | -0.20% |
| VanEck Mortgage REIT Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBD has been closely correlated with BSBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BBD jumps, then BSBR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBD | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| BSBR - BBD | 78% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| INTR - BBD | 71% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| BBDO - BBD | 69% Closely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| BSAC - BBD | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| BCH - BBD | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSBR has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSBR jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSBR | 100% | N/A | ||
| ITUB - BSBR | 81% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| BBD - BSBR | 77% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| INTR - BSBR | 69% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| BBDO - BSBR | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| BSAC - BSBR | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.91% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTR has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INTR jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTR | 100% | -2.88% | ||
| BBD - INTR | 71% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| BSBR - INTR | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ITUB - INTR | 67% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| NU - INTR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| BBDO - INTR | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.97% | ||
More | ||||