Advertisement
CCEP or MNST or PEP
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coca-Cola Europacific Partners (CCEP) vs. Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) vs. PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CCEP has delivered strong year-to-date performance of approximately 20.8%, supported by volume growth and analyst upgrades.
- MNST leads with about 25.7% YTD gains, driven by robust revenue expansion and an upcoming 2-for-1 stock split effective August 11, 2026.
- PEP has lagged with modest 0.9% YTD returns following a mixed second-quarter earnings report that included an EPS miss.
- All three companies operate in the consumer defensive beverages sector but differ in growth profiles, with MNST focused on energy drinks and CCEP and PEP offering broader portfolios including soft drinks and snacks.
- Valuation multiples show MNST trading at a premium (trailing P/E around 46.6), while PEP offers a lower multiple (around 18.3) and higher dividend yield of 4.24%.
- Upcoming catalysts include earnings releases for CCEP on August 4 and MNST on August 6, 2026.
Introduction
The comparison of CCEP, MNST, and PEP provides traders and investors with insights into relative performance within the non-alcoholic beverages sector. These stocks represent distinct business models—Coca-Cola bottling operations, energy drink specialization, and diversified snacks and beverages—making the analysis relevant for those evaluating sector exposure, growth consistency, and valuation differences in the current market environment.
CCEP Overview and Recent Performance
Coca-Cola Europacific Partners PLC produces, distributes, and sells non-alcoholic beverages across Europe, Australia, and the Pacific region under brands including Coca-Cola, Monster Energy, and Schweppes. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience with year-to-date gains of approximately 20.8%, outperforming broader benchmarks amid solid comparable volume growth and sustainability initiatives. Analyst sentiment remains constructive, with recent rating maintenance and price target increases reflecting confidence in its regional footprint and earnings trajectory ahead of the August 4, 2026 earnings release.
MNST Overview and Recent Performance
Monster Beverage Corporation develops and markets energy drinks and related beverages through brands such as Monster Energy and Reign. The stock has posted approximately 25.7% year-to-date gains, supported by strong revenue growth exceeding 26% in recent quarters and consistent earnings beats. Recent developments include an announced 2-for-1 stock split effective August 11, 2026, and anticipation around the August 6 earnings report, with Wall Street maintaining a positive outlook on its growth momentum in the energy drink category.
PEP Overview and Recent Performance
PepsiCo, Inc. manufactures and distributes a wide range of beverages and convenient foods globally under brands including Pepsi, Gatorade, and Lay's. The stock has recorded modest year-to-date performance of about 0.9%, impacted by a mixed second-quarter 2026 earnings report that featured a revenue beat but an EPS miss amid North American consumer pressures. Despite these headwinds, the company maintains a substantial market capitalization and continues to emphasize sustainability efforts and international demand.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the best and most suitable for current market conditions earn placement in this section. Bots feature varying trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and ticker sets, with performance metrics often spanning double-digit returns in favorable periods depending on market conditions. This resource allows users to explore automated approaches tailored to stocks like those discussed here. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CCEP and PEP share exposure to traditional soft drinks and snacks but differ in geographic focus, with CCEP more concentrated in Europe and the Pacific. MNST stands apart through its energy drink specialization, which has driven higher recent momentum but also elevated valuation multiples compared to the more diversified peers. Risk factors include consumer spending sensitivity for PEP, regional economic variables for CCEP, and category concentration for MNST. Valuation sensitivity favors PEP on a price-to-earnings basis, while growth drivers point to stronger recent positioning for MNST and CCEP amid broader sector trends.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and recent relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to MNST due to its stronger year-to-date momentum and upcoming catalysts, followed by CCEP for its balanced growth profile, with PEP positioned more defensively amid recent underperformance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -1.07% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -6.25% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated -0.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-2.40% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCEP | MNST | PEP | |
| Capitalization | 47.3B | 88.5B | 190B |
| EBITDA | 3.35B | 2.71B | 18.6B |
| Gain YTD | 19.394 | 17.856 | -1.242 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.10 | 41.83 | 18.22 |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 8.79B | 96.9B |
| Total Cash | 2.06B | 2.99B | 10.7B |
| Total Debt | 12B | 199M | 53.2B |
CCEP | MNST | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 12 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 37 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 48 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 47 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 2 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (16) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (29) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (87) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to CCEP’s and significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (20) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PEP (85) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to CCEP’s and significantly faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (37) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (62) in the null industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as MNST (48) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is in the same range as PEP (61) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (65) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (84) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to CCEP’s and somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | MNST | PEP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 26% | 3 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 5 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 60% | 12 days ago 39% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 48% | 5 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 32% |
Advertisement
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.04% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.53% | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FIZZ - CCEP | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | -4.04% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | +16.83% | ||
| COCO - MNST | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
More | ||||
PEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEP has been loosely correlated with KDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PEP jumps, then KDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| KDP - PEP | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CCEP - PEP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| FIZZ - PEP | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MNST - PEP | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.04% | ||
| COKE - PEP | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.53% | ||
More | ||||