Advertisement
CCEP or MNST or PEP
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CCEP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PEP’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CCEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MNST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PEP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CCEP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s), and PEP’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CCEP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MNST’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CCEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +4.31% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +7.47% , and PEP (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price fluctuated +4.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +5.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
CCEP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
MNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
PEP is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+5.71% weekly)Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.
| CCEP | MNST | PEP | |
| Capitalization | 47.6B | 95.8B | 197B |
| EBITDA | 3.35B | 2.83B | 18.6B |
| Gain YTD | 21.411 | 27.612 | 2.772 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.22 | 45.30 | 18.96 |
| Revenue | 20.9B | 9.22B | 96.9B |
| Total Cash | 2.06B | 1.17B | 10.7B |
| Total Debt | 12B | 199M | 53.2B |
CCEP | MNST | PEP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 42 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 87 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 51 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 35 | 20 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 45 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 30 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 55 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEP's Valuation (17) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (30) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for MNST (87) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to CCEP’s and significantly faster than MNST’s over the last 12 months.
CCEP's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MNST (51) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for PEP (87) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that CCEP's stock grew somewhat faster than MNST’s and significantly faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
PEP's SMR Rating (20) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (35) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEP (62) in the null industry. This means that PEP's stock grew similarly to MNST’s and somewhat faster than CCEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (48) in the null industry, and is in the same range as PEP (57) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to CCEP’s and similarly to PEP’s over the last 12 months.
MNST's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CCEP (55) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PEP (82) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry. This means that MNST's stock grew similarly to CCEP’s and somewhat faster than PEP’s over the last 12 months.
| CCEP | MNST | PEP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 38% | 19 days ago 48% | 21 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 48% | N/A |
Advertisement
CCEP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCEP has been loosely correlated with MNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCEP jumps, then MNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCEP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCEP | 100% | +1.96% | ||
| MNST - CCEP | 44% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| PEP - CCEP | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| COKE - CCEP | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| KDP - CCEP | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| FIZZ - CCEP | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.16% | ||
More | ||||
MNST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with CCEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then CCEP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MNST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MNST | 100% | +2.36% | ||
| CCEP - MNST | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| KDP - MNST | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CELH - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | +5.01% | ||
| PEP - MNST | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| COCO - MNST | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||