Advertisement
CHD or CL or KMB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Church & Dwight (CHD) vs. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) vs. Kimberly-Clark (KMB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Church & Dwight (CHD) delivered 5.8% organic sales growth in Q2 2026 alongside margin expansion, supporting steady recent performance in the consumer staples sector.
- Colgate-Palmolive (CL) reported Q2 2026 results with net sales of $5.36 billion and base business EPS of $0.99, beating estimates while maintaining full-year guidance.
- Kimberly-Clark (KMB) offers an attractive dividend yield near 4.7% and trades at a lower forward valuation relative to peers, with Q2 2026 results scheduled for August 4.
- All three stocks operate in defensive consumer staples categories, with varying exposure to pricing power, volume trends, and input cost pressures over recent weeks.
- Relative momentum has favored names with stronger organic growth signals, while valuation differentials highlight trade-offs between growth consistency and income potential.
- Sector-wide sentiment remains influenced by consumer spending patterns and retailer dynamics in a stable but competitive market environment.
Introduction
Church & Dwight (CHD), Colgate-Palmolive (CL), and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) represent established players in the consumer staples sector, offering investors exposure to everyday household and personal care products. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, earnings trends, and market positioning to assist traders and portfolio managers evaluating defensive holdings. The analysis focuses on verifiable developments from the past several weeks within a broader multi-quarter context, providing balanced insights for those assessing relative performance, dividend characteristics, and sector resilience amid evolving consumer demand.
CHD Overview and Recent Performance
Church & Dwight (CHD) manufactures and markets a range of consumer products, including baking soda, laundry detergents, and oral care items under brands such as Arm & Hammer and Orajel. In recent market activity, the stock reflected positive sentiment following Q2 2026 results that showed net sales of $1.53 billion, up 1.6% year-over-year, with organic sales growth of 5.8%. Adjusted EPS reached $0.89, accompanied by gross margin improvement of 240 basis points. These factors contributed to stable price behavior in recent weeks, supported by operational efficiency and volume trends in core categories.
CL Overview and Recent Performance
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) focuses on oral care, personal care, and pet nutrition products globally. Recent performance aligned with Q2 2026 earnings that exceeded expectations, posting net sales of $5.36 billion (up 4.9% year-over-year) and base business EPS of $0.99. Organic sales rose 2.4%, and the company reaffirmed full-year guidance. The stock traded near $91.30 as of July 31, 2026, with year-to-date gains around 15-17%, reflecting resilience amid mixed valuation signals such as a forward P/E near 35x and indications of cash-flow undervaluation.
KMB Overview and Recent Performance
Kimberly-Clark (KMB) produces tissue, personal care, and hygiene products, including well-known brands in diapers and paper goods. In recent weeks, attention has centered on the upcoming Q2 2026 earnings release scheduled for August 4, following a solid Q1 performance. The stock offers a forward dividend yield near 4.7% and trades at a lower valuation multiple compared with sector peers. Broader market activity has highlighted its defensive qualities and balance sheet strength, though near-term price movements have responded to macroeconomic factors affecting consumer staples broadly.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only the highest-performing and most adaptable bots for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots exhibit varied statistics, including different win rates, profit factors, maximum drawdowns, and trading frequencies that span intraday to longer-term strategies. Each bot employs distinct algorithms, risk parameters, and ticker sets, allowing users to review performance metrics and backtest data directly. Explore the full range of options on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed comparisons.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Church & Dwight (CHD), Colgate-Palmolive (CL), and Kimberly-Clark (KMB) share consumer staples exposure yet differ in business models and growth drivers. CHD emphasizes niche household categories with demonstrated organic growth momentum in recent quarters. CL benefits from global scale in oral care and a recent earnings beat that reinforced guidance stability. KMB provides higher dividend income potential and lower forward valuation, appealing to income-focused strategies amid integration activities. Risk factors include input cost volatility for all three, with CL showing greater sensitivity to emerging market volumes and CHD displaying lower beta characteristics historically. Recent momentum has tilted toward names delivering consistent organic expansion, while valuation differentials create trade-offs between growth visibility and yield.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent organic growth consistency, earnings delivery, and relative stability, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward Church & Dwight (CHD) for its demonstrated volume and margin trends in the latest reporting period. Colgate-Palmolive (CL) follows closely due to its earnings beat and reaffirmed outlook, while Kimberly-Clark (KMB) offers defensive attributes suited to income-oriented positioning ahead of its earnings release. These assessments reflect measurable data points rather than forward projections.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and KMB’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CHD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and KMB’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CHD (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +4.48% price change this week, while CL (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +2.16% , and KMB (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated +0.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.38%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHD is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
CL is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.
KMB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+1.75% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| CHD | CL | KMB | |
| Capitalization | 24.5B | 74.4B | 36.5B |
| EBITDA | 1.31B | 3.84B | 3.21B |
| Gain YTD | 24.051 | 19.831 | 10.529 |
| P/E Ratio | 33.09 | 36.72 | 21.68 |
| Revenue | 6.23B | 21B | 16.6B |
| Total Cash | 255M | 1.37B | 542M |
| Total Debt | 2.26B | 7.86B | 7.08B |
CHD | CL | KMB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 77 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 63 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 6 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 51 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 16 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 55 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KMB's Valuation (21) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (68) and is significantly better than the same rating for CL (94). This means that KMB's stock grew somewhat faster than CHD’s and significantly faster than CL’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (63) and is somewhat better than the same rating for KMB (100). This means that CHD's stock grew similarly to CL’s and somewhat faster than KMB’s over the last 12 months.
CL's SMR Rating (6) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (10) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (52). This means that CL's stock grew similarly to KMB’s and somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
CHD's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CL (51) and is in the same range as KMB (55). This means that CHD's stock grew similarly to CL’s and similarly to KMB’s over the last 12 months.
CL's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as KMB (35) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (79). This means that CL's stock grew similarly to KMB’s and somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.
| CHD | CL | KMB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 6 days ago 44% | 6 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 5 days ago 41% | 5 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 46% |
Advertisement
CHD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHD has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHD jumps, then CL could also see price increases.
CL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CL has been closely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CL jumps, then PG could also see price increases.
KMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KMB has been loosely correlated with CHD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KMB jumps, then CHD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMB | 100% | -3.30% | ||
| CHD - KMB | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| UL - KMB | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| IPAR - KMB | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.54% | ||
| EPC - KMB | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.70% | ||
| MAGN - KMB | 25% Poorly correlated | -7.46% | ||
More | ||||