Advertisement
COIN or HUBS or S
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) vs. HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs. SentinelOne, Inc. (S) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- COIN has delivered an 18.2% year-to-date return amid regulatory developments in cryptocurrency and company initiatives in artificial intelligence and stablecoins.
- HUBS reported 23% year-over-year revenue growth in the first quarter and raised full-year guidance, yet its shares have declined significantly and trade near 2019 levels.
- S achieved its first full year of non-GAAP operating profitability in fiscal 2026 with revenue exceeding $1 billion, supported by annualized recurring revenue growth of 22%.
- Relative performance shows HUBS leading year-to-date with a 49.7% gain, followed by S at 24.7% and COIN at 18.2%, all outperforming the S&P 500’s 9.2% return.
- Sector exposure differs markedly: COIN ties to digital assets, HUBS to customer relationship management software, and S to cybersecurity platforms.
- Valuation sensitivity varies, with COIN exhibiting higher volatility linked to cryptocurrency prices and regulatory sentiment.
Introduction
This comparison examines three publicly traded companies—COIN, HUBS, and S—operating in distinct growth-oriented sectors. Coinbase Global, Inc. provides cryptocurrency exchange and related financial services. HubSpot, Inc. delivers customer relationship management and marketing software platforms. SentinelOne, Inc. offers endpoint security and cybersecurity solutions. The analysis focuses on recent market activity, business fundamentals, and relative positioning to assist institutional investors, active traders, and portfolio managers evaluating diversification across fintech, software-as-a-service, and cybersecurity exposures in the current environment.
COIN Overview and Recent Performance
Coinbase Global, Inc. operates a leading cryptocurrency exchange platform with additional services including custody, staking, and stablecoin issuance. In recent weeks, COIN shares have fluctuated in response to broader digital asset price movements and legislative progress on cryptocurrency regulation in the United States. The stock closed at $184.99 on May 22, 2026, reflecting a year-to-date gain of 18.2% compared with the S&P 500’s 9.2% advance. Company updates highlighted continued growth in USDC holdings and new product launches such as perpetual-style equity index futures. Market sentiment has been influenced by mixed analyst revisions and ongoing discussions around the CLARITY Act, contributing to elevated volatility relative to broader equity indices.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot, Inc. provides an integrated customer relationship management platform encompassing marketing, sales, and service tools, with increasing emphasis on artificial intelligence features. In recent market activity, HUBS reported first-quarter 2026 revenue of $881 million, representing 23% year-over-year growth, and raised full-year guidance. The shares closed at $201.97 on May 22, 2026, delivering a year-to-date return of 49.7%. Despite the strong operational results and margin expansion, the stock has experienced notable pressure and now trades near levels last seen in 2019. Investor reaction appears tied to expectations for sustained growth acceleration amid competitive software sector dynamics.
S Overview and Recent Performance
SentinelOne, Inc. develops an artificial intelligence-driven cybersecurity platform focused on endpoint protection, threat detection, and response. Recent developments include the company surpassing $1 billion in annual revenue for fiscal 2026, achieving 22% growth in annualized recurring revenue, and reporting its first full year of non-GAAP operating profitability. The stock closed at $18.71 on May 22, 2026, posting a year-to-date gain of 24.7%. First-quarter earnings are scheduled for release imminently, with consensus expectations centered on revenue between $276 million and $278 million. Market positioning reflects continued adoption of its platform alongside broader cybersecurity demand trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots page that highlights select AI trading bots from a library of hundreds designed to trade thousands of different tickers. Only the highest-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions are featured in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker universes, with historical statistics often showing varying win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles across equity, sector, and thematic exposures. Traders can review detailed backtested and live performance data to identify bots aligned with specific risk tolerances and market views. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models diverge substantially: COIN derives revenue primarily from trading fees and cryptocurrency-related services, creating direct exposure to digital asset volumes and prices. HUBS generates recurring subscription revenue from its customer platform, benefiting from expansion in small and mid-sized business adoption and artificial intelligence enhancements. S earns recurring revenue through cybersecurity subscriptions, supported by rising enterprise demand for automated threat response. Recent momentum has favored HUBS on a year-to-date basis, while COIN exhibits greater sensitivity to regulatory catalysts and cryptocurrency price swings. Risk factors include regulatory uncertainty for COIN, competitive pressures and valuation compression for HUBS, and execution on growth targets for S. Sector exposures position each stock differently within growth technology themes, with valuation multiples reflecting varying expectations for profitability trajectories and macroeconomic resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings delivery, and relative stability in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to HUBS due to its demonstrated revenue growth and raised guidance despite share price pressure. S follows closely, supported by the milestone of non-GAAP profitability and recurring revenue expansion. COIN ranks third in the current assessment owing to elevated volatility linked to external cryptocurrency and regulatory variables. These probabilistic weightings reflect backtested pattern recognition across multiple timeframes and are subject to change with new data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and S’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- COIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- S’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and S’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- S’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -19.38% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -3.62% , and S (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated -3.63% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -16.19%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.62%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -6.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
COIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
S is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (-4.17% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
@Packaged Software (-4.49% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (-6.75% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| COIN | HUBS | S | |
| Capitalization | 40.2B | 10.9B | 5.47B |
| EBITDA | 1.29B | 267M | -254.11M |
| Gain YTD | -32.608 | -47.012 | 6.333 |
| P/E Ratio | 56.03 | 111.92 | N/A |
| Revenue | 6.56B | 3.3B | 1B |
| Total Cash | 10.7B | 1.69B | 629M |
| Total Debt | 7.96B | 247M | 15M |
HUBS | S | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 1 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 25 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
S's Valuation (54) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as HUBS (80) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
S's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as S (98) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to S’s over the last 12 months.
S's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
S's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that S’s stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| COIN | HUBS | S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
S and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, S has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if S jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.