CRWD | FTNT | NOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 26 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 93 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 6 | 93 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 12 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 5 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 8 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 43 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOW's Valuation (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as FTNT (93) in the Computer Communications industry, and is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that NOW's stock grew similarly to FTNT’s and similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FTNT (6) in the Computer Communications industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for NOW (93) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to FTNT’s and significantly faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOW (59) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CRWD (89) in the null industry. This means that FTNT's stock grew somewhat faster than NOW’s and significantly faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (34) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for NOW (38) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FTNT's stock grew similarly to CRWD’s and somewhat faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as FTNT (8) in the Computer Communications industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for NOW (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to FTNT’s and significantly faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | FTNT | NOW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 63% | 12 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 77% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 80% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while FTNT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and NOW’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTNT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NOW’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.85% price change this week, while FTNT (@Computer Communications) price change was +7.63% , and NOW (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +4.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.44%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.75%.
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
NOW is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (+0.26% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOW has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOW jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOW | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| CRM - NOW | 78% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| ADBE - NOW | 74% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| SAP - NOW | 72% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| HUBS - NOW | 72% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| ASAN - NOW | 71% Closely correlated | +2.03% | ||
More | ||||