DECK
Price
$104.56
Change
+$1.97 (+1.92%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
14.52B
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RL
Price
$411.16
Change
+$1.05 (+0.26%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
24.47B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SHOO
Price
$43.22
Change
+$1.74 (+4.19%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DECK or RL or SHOO

DECK vs RL vs SHOO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) vs. Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) vs. Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • DECK has faced notable pressure in recent market activity, with shares declining amid broader sneaker sector challenges and mixed analyst revisions.
  • RL continues to demonstrate steady brand execution but has experienced volatility in recent weeks ahead of its fiscal fourth-quarter results.
  • SHOO reported stronger-than-expected first-quarter results and raised full-year guidance, supporting relative resilience in recent trading.
  • All three companies operate in the consumer discretionary footwear and apparel space, with varying exposure to premium lifestyle and fashion trends.
  • Upcoming earnings releases for DECK and RL in late May represent near-term catalysts that could influence short-term sentiment.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs between growth momentum at SHOO and established brand strength at DECK and RL.

Introduction

This comparison examines three established players in the footwear and apparel sector: DECK, RL, and SHOO. Investors and traders focused on consumer discretionary stocks often review such peers to assess relative momentum, valuation sensitivity, and sector positioning within a dynamic retail environment. The analysis draws on recent market developments to highlight observable contrasts in performance drivers and risk profiles without projecting future outcomes.

DECK Overview and Recent Performance

Deckers Outdoor Corporation designs, markets, and distributes premium footwear and apparel under brands including UGG and HOKA. In recent weeks, the stock has encountered headwinds tied to broader industry softness in the sneaker category. Shares traded lower amid analyst commentary that included both upgrades and downward price target adjustments. Market participants have noted the company’s upcoming fiscal fourth-quarter and full-year earnings release as a potential near-term focus point, with prior periods reflecting solid revenue growth from core brands.

RL Overview and Recent Performance

Ralph Lauren Corporation operates a global lifestyle brand portfolio spanning apparel, accessories, and home products. Recent market activity has shown price fluctuations for the shares ahead of the company’s fiscal fourth-quarter earnings report. Performance in prior quarters benefited from double-digit comparable sales growth in certain channels, though broader consumer spending patterns have contributed to mixed sentiment in the latest period. The stock’s positioning reflects ongoing emphasis on brand elevation and wholesale execution.

SHOO Overview and Recent Performance

Steven Madden, Ltd. designs and distributes fashion footwear and accessories across wholesale and direct-to-consumer channels. In recent weeks, the company delivered first-quarter results that exceeded expectations on both revenue and earnings, prompting an upward revision to full-year revenue guidance. This development supported relative stability in share price compared with sector peers. Growth drivers included strength in women’s fashion categories and contributions from recent acquisitions.

Trending AI Robots

Trending AI Robots showcases a curated selection from Tickeron’s extensive library of AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse market conditions. While Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI-powered bots featuring varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing conditions appear in the trending section. Available bots display a range of historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics that traders can review for informational purposes. This resource offers market participants a transparent view of automated approaches suited to different risk tolerances and investment horizons.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business models differ in emphasis: DECK centers on performance-oriented and lifestyle footwear, RL leverages premium apparel heritage, and SHOO focuses on accessible fashion footwear with wholesale scale. Growth drivers include brand-specific demand at DECK, retail comp expansion at RL, and direct-to-consumer gains plus acquisitions at SHOO. Recent momentum favors SHOO following its earnings beat, while DECK and RL contend with near-term earnings anticipation. Risk factors encompass consumer discretionary spending sensitivity across all three, with DECK additionally exposed to athletic footwear cycles. Valuation sensitivity appears elevated for growth-oriented names, and market sentiment reflects sector rotation influences in recent trading.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, guidance revisions, and relative price stability, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term positioning to SHOO. The assessment draws from documented revenue growth and raised outlook rather than forward projections, while acknowledging that upcoming reports for DECK and RL could alter relative standing.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2026
Stock price -- (DECK: $104.56RL: $411.16SHOO: $43.17)
Brand notoriety: DECK, RL and SHOO are all not notable
DECK and SHOO are part of the Wholesale Distributors industry, and RL is in the Apparel/Footwear industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DECK: 266%, RL: 193%, SHOO: 447%
Market capitalization -- DECK: $14.52B, RL: $24.47B, SHOO: $3.16B
$DECK [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $14.52B. $SHOO’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $ $3.16B. $RL [@Apparel/Footwear] has a market capitalization of $ $24.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $ $60.35B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry ranges from $ $27.62B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $ $7.71B. The average market capitalization across the [@Apparel/Footwear] industry is $ $3.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DECK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and SHOO’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DECK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SHOO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RL is a better buy in the long-term than SHOO, which in turn is a better option than DECK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DECK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and SHOO’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DECK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHOO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RL is a better buy in the short-term than DECK, which in turn is a better option than SHOO.

Price Growth

DECK (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -4.17% price change this week, while RL (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was -0.20% , and SHOO (@Wholesale Distributors) price fluctuated -2.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.56%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

DECK is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

RL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

SHOO is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (-1.04% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

@Apparel/Footwear (-0.79% weekly)

Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RL($24.5B) has a higher market cap than DECK($14.5B) and SHOO($3.16B). SHOO has higher P/E ratio than RL and DECK: SHOO (40.31) vs RL (27.14) and DECK (15.04). RL YTD gains are higher at: 16.879 vs. SHOO (4.808) and DECK (0.858). RL and DECK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B and 1.41B vs. SHOO (177M). DECK has less debt than SHOO and RL: DECK (375M) vs SHOO (540M) and RL (3.01B). RL has higher revenues than DECK and SHOO: RL (8.12B) vs DECK (5.47B) and SHOO (2.63B).
DECKRLSHOO
Capitalization14.5B24.5B3.16B
EBITDA1.41B1.47B177M
Gain YTD0.85816.8794.808
P/E Ratio15.0427.1440.31
Revenue5.47B8.12B2.63B
Total Cash1.91BN/A123M
Total Debt375M3.01B540M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DECK vs RL vs SHOO: Fundamental Ratings
DECK
RL
SHOO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
621677
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
781284
SMR RATING
1..100
232877
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
571544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHOO's Valuation (23) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (70) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for DECK (77) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that SHOO's stock grew somewhat faster than RL’s and somewhat faster than DECK’s over the last 12 months.

RL's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for DECK (78) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SHOO (84) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL's stock grew significantly faster than DECK’s and significantly faster than SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

DECK's SMR Rating (23) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as RL (28) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for SHOO (77) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that DECK's stock grew similarly to RL’s and somewhat faster than SHOO’s over the last 12 months.

RL's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as SHOO (44) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for DECK (57) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that RL's stock grew similarly to SHOO’s and somewhat faster than DECK’s over the last 12 months.

SHOO's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RL (38) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for DECK (57) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that SHOO's stock grew somewhat faster than RL’s and somewhat faster than DECK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DECKRLSHOO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DECK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SHOO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAYR54.940.74
+1.36%
Federated Hermes Enhanced Income ETF
ZJUL29.90-0.02
-0.05%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF - 1Yr Jul
XYLD40.22-0.03
-0.07%
Global X S&P 500® Covered Call ETF
SOR44.90-0.11
-0.24%
Source Capital
BOAT39.61-0.77
-1.91%
SonicShares™ Global Shipping ETF

DECK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DECK has been loosely correlated with ONON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DECK jumps, then ONON could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DECK
1D Price
Change %
DECK100%
+1.92%
ONON - DECK
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
KTB - DECK
49%
Loosely correlated
+4.24%
CAL - DECK
48%
Loosely correlated
+8.18%
PVH - DECK
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.29%
NKE - DECK
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
More

RL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RL has been loosely correlated with WWW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RL jumps, then WWW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RL
1D Price
Change %
RL100%
+0.50%
WWW - RL
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
ONON - RL
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
DECK - RL
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
SHOO - RL
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.07%
BIRK - RL
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
More