DY
Price
$483.48
Change
+$18.84 (+4.05%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
14.52B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MTZ
Price
$393.14
Change
+$2.70 (+0.69%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
31.07B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$701.88
Change
-$0.41 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
105.32B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DY or MTZ or PWR

DY vs MTZ vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Dycom Industries (DY) vs. MasTec (MTZ) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Dycom Industries (DY), MasTec (MTZ), and Quanta Services (PWR) operate in the infrastructure construction sector, with exposure to telecommunications, power delivery, and clean energy projects supporting AI data center buildouts.
  • All three companies reported strong first-quarter 2026 results featuring record or near-record backlogs and raised full-year guidance amid robust demand for utility and communications infrastructure.
  • Recent market activity shows elevated volatility across the group, with share prices reacting to earnings releases, analyst upgrades, and broader market sentiment on infrastructure spending.
  • Relative performance over the past year has favored MasTec (MTZ) and Quanta Services (PWR) with gains exceeding 100%, while Dycom Industries (DY) delivered solid but comparatively moderate returns.
  • Key trade-offs include differences in scale, segment focus, and volatility, with larger backlogs at Quanta Services (PWR) providing visibility and MasTec (MTZ) showing higher growth momentum in communications.
  • Market positioning reflects shared tailwinds from grid modernization and data center power needs, tempered by valuation sensitivity and execution risks in a competitive environment.

Introduction

Infrastructure contractors Dycom Industries (DY), MasTec (MTZ), and Quanta Services (PWR) provide specialty construction services essential to telecommunications networks, electric power transmission, and renewable energy projects. These stocks attract attention from traders and investors seeking exposure to long-term spending on AI-related data centers, grid upgrades, and broadband expansion. The comparison highlights differences in business scale, recent earnings momentum, backlog trends, and relative stock behavior in the current market environment. Participants in this sector often monitor quarterly results, analyst revisions, and macroeconomic factors affecting capital expenditure by utilities and technology firms.

Dycom Industries (DY) Overview and Recent Performance

Dycom Industries (DY) specializes in engineering and construction services for telecommunications infrastructure and utilities across the United States. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience following earlier gains, with share prices reflecting investor reassessment after strong prior periods driven by demand for fiber and wireless projects. Recent weeks featured modest price fluctuations amid broader sector movements and post-earnings digestion, supported by the company's positioning in high-growth communications segments. Sentiment has benefited from ongoing infrastructure tailwinds, though the stock has exhibited sensitivity to valuation discussions and market rotations.

MasTec (MTZ) Overview and Recent Performance

MasTec (MTZ) delivers infrastructure solutions in communications, clean energy, power delivery, and pipeline construction primarily in North America. Recent market activity highlighted record quarterly revenue and an expanded backlog, prompting an upward revision to full-year guidance. The stock experienced volatility around earnings, with initial positive reactions giving way to profit-taking in subsequent sessions. Performance has been influenced by strength across segments and analyst commentary on growth prospects in communications and renewables, contributing to elevated trading volumes and momentum in recent weeks.

Quanta Services (PWR) Overview and Recent Performance

Quanta Services (PWR) provides comprehensive infrastructure services focused on electric power, renewables, and underground utilities. In recent market activity, the company announced a significant share repurchase authorization alongside continued backlog expansion and raised guidance following first-quarter results. Share prices have fluctuated with valuation considerations after strong prior gains, supported by robust project visibility in power transmission and data center-related work. Sentiment remains tied to execution on large-scale contracts and broader utility spending trends.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots cover thousands of tickers and employ varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics tailored to different market conditions. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing trends and risk-adjusted metrics earn placement in the trending section. Users can explore detailed bot statistics, including historical returns and ticker-specific performance, to identify suitable automated strategies. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current options and further details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Dycom Industries (DY), MasTec (MTZ), and Quanta Services (PWR) share exposure to infrastructure spending but differ in scale and segment emphasis. Quanta Services (PWR) operates at the largest revenue base with extensive electric and underground capabilities, offering greater backlog visibility at approximately $48.5 billion. MasTec (MTZ) emphasizes communications and clean energy, delivering higher recent growth rates and a backlog that has expanded sharply year-over-year. Dycom Industries (DY) maintains a focused telecommunications and utility contracting model with solid but narrower exposure. Recent momentum has been strongest at MasTec (MTZ) on earnings beats and guidance lifts, while Quanta Services (PWR) benefits from buyback support and scale. Risk factors include higher beta volatility at MasTec (MTZ) versus steadier profiles at the larger peers. Valuation sensitivity appears across all three amid strong prior gains, with sentiment supported by AI infrastructure catalysts yet tempered by execution and macroeconomic variables.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, backlog-driven catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI currently assigns a higher probability of near-term outperformance to MasTec (MTZ). The company’s recent earnings momentum, substantial backlog growth, and communications segment strength align with prevailing infrastructure demand patterns. Quanta Services (PWR) offers advantages in scale and stability, while Dycom Industries (DY) provides targeted exposure with moderate volatility. These assessments reflect probabilistic evaluations rather than guarantees and should be considered alongside individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 25, 2026
Stock price -- (DY: $483.48MTZ: $393.14PWR: $701.88)
Brand notoriety: DY and PWR are not notable and MTZ is notable
The three companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DY: 120%, MTZ: 63%, PWR: 77%
Market capitalization -- DY: $14.52B, MTZ: $31.07B, PWR: $105.32B
$DY is valued at $14.52B, while MTZ has a market capitalization of $31.07B, and PWR's market capitalization is $105.32B. The market cap for tickers in this @Engineering & Construction ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Engineering & Construction industry is $10.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PWR’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • DY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, DY is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ and PWR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PWR’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than DY and MTZ.

Price Growth

DY (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.79% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +4.86% , and PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price fluctuated -1.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -0.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

DY is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2026.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-0.15% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($105B) has a higher market cap than MTZ($31.1B) and DY($14.5B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than MTZ and DY: PWR (101.53) vs MTZ (71.16) and DY (44.70). MTZ YTD gains are higher at: 80.862 vs. PWR (66.375) and DY (43.084). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.71B vs. MTZ (1.22B) and DY (807M). DY has more cash in the bank: 539M vs. PWR (365M) and MTZ (274M). DY and MTZ has less debt than PWR: DY (3B) and MTZ (3.02B) vs PWR (6.32B). PWR has higher revenues than MTZ and DY: PWR (30.1B) vs MTZ (15.3B) and DY (6.25B).
DYMTZPWR
Capitalization14.5B31.1B105B
EBITDA807M1.22B2.71B
Gain YTD43.08480.86266.375
P/E Ratio44.7071.16101.53
Revenue6.25B15.3B30.1B
Total Cash539M274M365M
Total Debt3B3.02B6.32B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DY vs MTZ vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
DY
MTZ
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
83962
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6144
SMR RATING
1..100
465963
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
383839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
193614
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DY's Valuation (79) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (86) and is in the same range as PWR (89). This means that DY's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (6) and is in the same range as MTZ (14). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to DY’s and similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

DY's SMR Rating (46) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (59) and is in the same range as PWR (63). This means that DY's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

DY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (38) and is in the same range as PWR (39). This means that DY's stock grew similarly to MTZ’s and similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as DY (19) and is in the same range as MTZ (36). This means that PWR's stock grew similarly to DY’s and similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DYMTZPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MTZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CATY61.620.73
+1.20%
Cathay General Bancorp
MEC34.390.23
+0.67%
Mayville Engineering Company
STLD241.39-2.30
-0.94%
Steel Dynamics
ECBK19.84-0.29
-1.44%
ECB Bancorp
BTCT1.20-0.09
-6.98%
BTC Digital Ltd

DY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DY has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DY jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DY
1D Price
Change %
DY100%
+4.05%
MTZ - DY
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
PWR - DY
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
MYRG - DY
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
STRL - DY
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.80%
FIX - DY
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
+0.69%
PWR - MTZ
81%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
FIX - MTZ
75%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
MYRG - MTZ
74%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
ECG - MTZ
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
EME - MTZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
-0.06%
MTZ - PWR
81%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
MYRG - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
+0.44%
FIX - PWR
76%
Closely correlated
+2.43%
IESC - PWR
68%
Closely correlated
+5.20%
EME - PWR
68%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
More