Advertisement
GD or HII or LMT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? General Dynamics (GD) vs. Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) vs. Lockheed Martin (LMT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LMT carries the largest scale, with a record backlog near $230 billion and accelerating sales, but its shares have cooled from early-year highs.
- GD offers diversified exposure across aerospace, marine systems, and land vehicles, backed by a record backlog of roughly $136.5 billion.
- HII is the most specialized of the three as a pure-play U.S. Navy shipbuilder, giving it concentrated exposure to naval budgets and shipyard execution.
- Recent market activity has shown a broad pullback across defense prime contractors, even as fundamentals such as backlogs and contract awards remain strong.
- Relative performance, valuation, and risk profiles differ meaningfully, making this a comparison of scale and diversification versus focus and cyclicality.
Introduction
Defense contractors have drawn renewed investor attention as rising global tensions and inventory restocking drive record order backlogs. This article compares three prominent U.S. aerospace and defense names — General Dynamics (GD), Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII), and Lockheed Martin (LMT) — across business models, recent performance, growth drivers, and risk factors. Traders seeking momentum and long-term investors evaluating sector positioning may both find this stock comparison useful. Each company serves the U.S. Department of Defense but does so through different platforms, from combat aircraft and missiles to armored vehicles and nuclear-powered naval vessels, creating distinct market positioning and valuation sensitivity.
GD Overview and Recent Performance
General Dynamics (GD) is a diversified aerospace and defense company operating across four segments: Aerospace (Gulfstream business jets), Marine Systems, Combat Systems, and Technologies. This breadth reduces its reliance on any single program or customer. The company has reported a record company-wide backlog of approximately $136.5 billion and a book-to-bill ratio of 1.4x, reflecting strong order intake. In recent weeks, however, GD shares have pulled back alongside the broader defense sector, with the stock trading well below its 52-week high and down roughly 10% over the past month. Sentiment has been influenced by sector-wide profit-taking, capital rotation out of industrial prime contractors, and analyst price-target adjustments, even as demand for programs such as Stryker armored vehicles and U.S. Navy work remains steady. The stock trades near a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of roughly 19–20 times, below the industry average.
HII Overview and Recent Performance
Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) is America's largest military shipbuilder, designing and building nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and submarines at Newport News Shipbuilding, surface combatants and amphibious ships at Ingalls Shipbuilding, and unmanned and mission technologies through its Mission Technologies segment. The company has reported improving financial momentum, with second-quarter 2026 revenue up roughly 10.9% year over year and diluted earnings per share (EPS, or profit allocated to each outstanding share) of $5.27, prompting a raised full-year shipbuilding outlook. Its backlog has climbed to roughly $57 billion on strong contract awards. Despite this, HII shares have been volatile, trading well below their 52-week high as investors weigh shipyard execution challenges, labor constraints, and the capital intensity of legacy contracts. Its concentrated naval exposure makes it more sensitive to budget and program-specific developments than its diversified peers.
LMT Overview and Recent Performance
Lockheed Martin (LMT) is the largest pure-play defense contractor of the three, with leading franchises across the F-35 fighter jet, PAC-3 and THAAD missile interceptors, HIMARS, and space systems. The company reported second-quarter sales of roughly $20.1 billion, up 11% year over year, and lifted its full-year outlook on accelerating munitions and missile-defense demand. Its backlog reached a record of about $230 billion, supported by large multi-year awards including a roughly $35 billion THAAD contract and a PAC-3 agreement worth up to about $58.6 billion. In recent weeks, LMT shares have outperformed the broader aerospace-defense group on a year-to-date basis but have pulled back from highs reached earlier in the year as the sector repriced. Execution risk on fixed-price programs, including F-16 and C-130 challenges, remains a factor in sentiment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers using diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics. Because market conditions are always shifting, not every bot is suited to every environment — which is why only the best-performing and most appropriate bots earn a place in the curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots differ in trading style, from short-term momentum to longer-horizon trend following, and each manages its own set of tickers, risk parameters, and statistics. Traders reviewing a stock comparison like this one can use such tools to observe how algorithmic strategies respond to the same names in real time. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which automated strategies are currently aligning with today's market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The three companies differ most sharply in focus and scale. LMT offers the broadest defense footprint and the largest backlog, giving it strong revenue visibility but also exposure to complex fixed-price program risk and a premium scale that can invite profit-taking. GD sits between diversification and defense cyclicality, blending stable government work with a commercial aerospace (Gulfstream) business that adds an economic-cycle variable absent in its peers. HII is the most concentrated, with essentially all of its revenue tied to naval shipbuilding; this yields high sensitivity to Navy budgets and shipyard productivity but limited diversification. On valuation, HII carries a lower P/E ratio and higher dividend yield, reflecting execution and concentration concerns, while LMT and GD trade at somewhat richer but still historically moderate multiples. Recent momentum has favored LMT on a year-to-date basis, while all three have participated in the sector's recent pullback.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, backlog visibility, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward Lockheed Martin (LMT) as the comparatively stronger candidate in the current environment. Its record backlog, accelerating sales growth, and diversified franchise across aircraft, missiles, and space provide a more durable catalyst path than its more concentrated peer HII and a clearer growth narrative than GD, whose commercial aerospace exposure introduces a separate cyclical variable. This assessment reflects probabilistic trend and stability signals rather than a definitive prediction, and relative positioning could shift as execution updates and budget developments unfold.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
GD in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on September 22, 2026
GD may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 20 of 32 cases where GD's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where GD's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 11 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 42%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on GD as a result. In 51 of 102 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for GD just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where GD's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 60 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
Following a +1.39% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GD advanced for three days, in 140 of 323 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 43%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 38%.
The Aroon Indicator for GD entered a downward trend on October 15, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 49 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (3.370) is normal, around the industry mean (6.305). P/E Ratio (20.376) is within average values for comparable stocks, (58.116). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.065) is also within normal values, averaging (2.564). Dividend Yield (0.019) settles around the average of (0.009) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.796) is also within normal values, averaging (18.330).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GD’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
HII's Indicator enters downward trend
The Aroon Indicator for HII entered a downward trend on October 15, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 162 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 98 of the 162 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 60%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on HII as a result. In 42 of 77 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HII declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where HII's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 18 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 34 of 53 cases where HII's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HII just turned positive on October 01, 2026. Looking at past instances where HII's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 24 of 40 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.
Following a +3.64% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HII advanced for three days, in 205 of 337 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
HII may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 28 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.907) is normal, around the industry mean (6.305). P/E Ratio (15.310) is within average values for comparable stocks, (58.116). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.788) is also within normal values, averaging (2.564). Dividend Yield (0.022) settles around the average of (0.009) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.830) is also within normal values, averaging (18.330).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. HII’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 68 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HII’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 75 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
LMT's RSI Indicator ascending out of oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for LMT moved out of oversold territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 37 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 22 of the 37 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 59%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on LMT as a result. In 43 of 78 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for LMT just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where LMT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 20 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 48%.
Following a +5.68% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LMT advanced for three days, in 194 of 339 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The 50-day moving average for LMT moved below the 200-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LMT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
LMT broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for LMT entered a downward trend on October 15, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 77, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LMT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 60 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (13.643) is normal, around the industry mean (6.305). P/E Ratio (19.104) is within average values for comparable stocks, (58.116). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.978) is also within normal values, averaging (2.564). Dividend Yield (0.027) settles around the average of (0.009) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.616) is also within normal values, averaging (18.330).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
GD | HII | LMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 58 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 68 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 61 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 61 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 75 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HII's Valuation (28) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as GD (49) and is in the same range as LMT (60). This means that HII's stock grew similarly to GD’s and similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
GD's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as LMT (38) and is somewhat better than the same rating for HII (68). This means that GD's stock grew similarly to LMT’s and somewhat faster than HII’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's SMR Rating (15) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GD (50) and is somewhat better than the same rating for HII (61). This means that LMT's stock grew somewhat faster than GD’s and somewhat faster than HII’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as GD (58) and is in the same range as HII (61). This means that LMT's stock grew similarly to GD’s and similarly to HII’s over the last 12 months.
GD's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HII (75) and is in the same range as LMT (77). This means that GD's stock grew similarly to HII’s and similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
| GD | HII | LMT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 60% | 14 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 50% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while HII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and LMT’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- GD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- LMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HII’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and LMT’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- HII’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GD (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +2.66% price change this week, while HII (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +0.83% , and LMT (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated +4.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -5.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
GD is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
HII is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
LMT is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (-5.75% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ELIL | 31.99 | 2.00 | +6.68% |
| Direxion Daily LLY Bull 2X ETF (ELIL) | |||
| FDM | 89.09 | 1.22 | +1.39% |
| First Trust Dow Jones Select MicroCap Index Fund (FDM) | |||
| DVOL | 35.69 | 0.32 | +0.92% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Low Volatility ETF (DVOL) | |||
| DMXF | 83.81 | 0.73 | +0.88% |
| iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EAFE ETF (DMXF) | |||
| QQQM | 299.79 | -0.34 | -0.11% |
| Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) | |||
GD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.
HII and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HII has been loosely correlated with KTOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HII jumps, then KTOS could also see price increases.
LMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMT has been closely correlated with NOC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LMT jumps, then NOC could also see price increases.