| GWRE | HUBS | MANH | |
| Capitalization | 11.8B | 10.8B | 12.3B |
| EBITDA | 205M | 333M | 289M |
| Gain YTD | -28.218 | -46.145 | 22.013 |
| P/E Ratio | 88.52 | 76.91 | 60.59 |
| Revenue | 1.48B | 3.45B | 1.13B |
| Total Cash | 753M | 1.34B | 186M |
| Total Debt | 715M | 237M | 53.9M |
GWRE | HUBS | MANH | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 76 | 14 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 62 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 98 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | 47 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUBS's Valuation (74) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as GWRE (80) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as MANH (91) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS's stock grew similarly to GWRE’s and similarly to MANH’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as GWRE (85) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH's stock grew similarly to GWRE’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's SMR Rating (14) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWRE (68) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (76) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH's stock grew somewhat faster than GWRE’s and somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as GWRE (61) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH's stock grew similarly to GWRE’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
MANH's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GWRE (98) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that MANH's stock grew somewhat faster than GWRE’s and somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| GWRE | HUBS | MANH | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | N/A | 4 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 74% | 19 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 72% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GWRE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while HUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and MANH’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GWRE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and MANH’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
GWRE (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.09% , and MANH (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +4.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.76%.
GWRE is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
MANH is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GWRE has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GWRE jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWRE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWRE | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| NOW - GWRE | 71% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| ASAN - GWRE | 69% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| CRM - GWRE | 67% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| PCOR - GWRE | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| WK - GWRE | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.03% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -5.86% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 76% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MANH has been closely correlated with PAYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MANH jumps, then PAYX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MANH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANH | 100% | +0.30% | ||
| PAYX - MANH | 67% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| WDAY - MANH | 67% Closely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| PCTY - MANH | 66% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| DT - MANH | 66% Closely correlated | -1.24% | ||
| BLKB - MANH | 66% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
More | ||||