Advertisement
HBAN or PNC or TFC
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Huntington Bancshares (HBAN) vs. PNC Financial Services (PNC) vs. Truist Financial (TFC) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- HBAN is in the middle of a large-scale transformation after completing two acquisitions, which has boosted scale but also raised credit and integration questions.
- PNC has delivered the most consistent recent momentum, with strong loan growth, an 18% dividend increase, and return on tangible common equity above 18%.
- TFC is under new leadership and executing a portfolio simplification, but its share price has lagged peers and the broader market this year.
- All three are large regional banks, making their relative performance highly sensitive to interest rates, net interest margin, and credit quality.
- Divergent catalysts — deal integration for HBAN, expansion-market growth for PNC, and balance-sheet repositioning for TFC — define the current trade-off.
Introduction
Huntington Bancshares, PNC Financial Services, and Truist Financial are three of the largest regional banks in the United States, and each is navigating a distinct phase of its strategic cycle. This stock comparison is relevant for investors and traders who track the banking sector's response to interest-rate shifts, credit trends, and consolidation. While the three companies share a similar economic backdrop, their market positioning and recent relative performance have diverged meaningfully, driven by acquisitions, leadership changes, and differing growth priorities. Comparing them side by side helps clarify which business model currently offers the most consistent trend and which carries more execution or credit risk.
HBAN Overview and Recent Performance
Huntington Bancshares is a super-regional bank holding company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, providing commercial, consumer, and mortgage banking. Recent market activity has been dominated by its completed all-stock acquisition of Cadence Bank, a roughly $7.4 billion deal that expanded its footprint to 21 states and strengthened its presence in Texas and the Southeast, alongside an earlier Veritex acquisition.
The enlarged balance sheet has lifted revenue and net interest income (NII), which is the difference between interest earned on loans and interest paid on deposits. Net interest margin (NIM), a key measure of lending profitability, improved in recent quarters. However, integration costs have pressured reported earnings, and non-performing loans have trended higher as the acquired loan book seasons. Sentiment has been mixed: analysts have largely maintained buy ratings, but the stock has underperformed despite positive guidance, reflecting investor caution around credit quality and execution risk.
PNC Overview and Recent Performance
PNC Financial Services is a diversified financial services company based in Pittsburgh, operating a national commercial banking platform and a growing retail network. Its recent performance has been characterized by steady execution rather than transformational deals, with the completed FirstBank acquisition now fully integrated into its operations.
In recent quarters, PNC has reported strong loan and deposit growth concentrated in its expansion markets, including the Southwest and Southeast. Net interest income has risen, and management expects further benefit from the repricing of fixed-rate assets. The company raised its quarterly dividend by 18%, a signal of confidence in capital generation. Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE), a profitability gauge that excludes intangible assets, has exceeded 18%. The main watch items are a modest decline in net interest margin from a mix shift toward lower-spread loans and gradually rising net charge-offs, though both remain within historically normal ranges.
TFC Overview and Recent Performance
Truist Financial is a Charlotte-based bank formed from the 2019 merger of BB&T and SunTrust, with a dense branch network across the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic. The company is in a period of strategic reset under a new chief executive who took over in September, and management has acknowledged that returns have fallen short of merger-era targets.
Recent activity has centered on portfolio simplification. Truist sold its Regional Acceptance Corporation subprime auto lending business and agreed to sell its LightStream unsecured consumer loan portfolio, moves intended to reduce credit risk and refocus capital on relationship banking. It also repositioned part of its securities portfolio, incurring a sizable one-time loss. These actions weighed on reported results, and the stock has lagged the broader market this year. Wealth management income reached a record, but net interest income growth remains modest, and profitability metrics still trail the company's own long-term goals.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of automated trading systems designed for current market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that monitor thousands of tickers, but only the strongest and most suitable performers earn a place in this featured section. Each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, and set of tickers, giving traders a range of approaches to review rather than a single one-size-fits-all signal. The robots vary in how frequently they trade, the risk parameters they use, and the markets they cover. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify which automated strategies currently align with your own analytical framework.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast among these three banks is the stage of their strategic lifecycles. HBAN is absorbing two large acquisitions simultaneously, trading near-term integration risk for a materially larger footprint and faster-growing markets. PNC is in harvest mode, converting an integrated acquisition and expansion-market investments into above-peer loan growth and steadily rising profitability. TFC is in turnaround mode, divesting non-core businesses and repositioning its balance sheet to improve returns, a process that is creating near-term earnings noise.
On growth drivers, PNC's expansion-market momentum and fixed-rate asset repricing are the most visible and near-term. HBAN's drivers are longer-dated, resting on successful integration and revenue synergies across capital markets, payments, and wealth. TFC's drivers are largely self-help, tied to cost discipline and capital reallocation. On risk, HBAN carries the most pronounced credit and integration exposure, while TFC carries restructuring and execution risk under new leadership. PNC presents the most stable, if unspectacular, profile.
Valuation sensitivity also differs. HBAN trades at a higher price-to-earnings multiple than peers, reflecting growth expectations that have yet to be fully validated. TFC screens as the laggard on both price performance and profitability. PNC occupies the middle ground, balancing a stronger earnings trajectory with a more demanding valuation than smaller regionals.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, stability, and near-term catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely favor PNC among the three. PNC currently exhibits the most coherent combination of positive price and earnings momentum, rising profitability, shareholder-friendly capital returns, and a clearly defined repricing catalyst, without the integration uncertainty weighing on HBAN or the restructuring noise surrounding TFC. HBAN would rank as the higher-risk, higher-reward candidate, with its outcome hinging on execution, while TFC's story remains compelling but still formative. As always, this assessment reflects a probabilistic view of current trends and positioning rather than a definitive forecast of future returns.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
HBAN's RSI Indicator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for HBAN moved out of oversold territory on September 25, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 19 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 13 of the 19 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 68%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on HBAN as a result. In 50 of 75 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HBAN just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where HBAN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +3.22% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HBAN advanced for three days, in 174 of 286 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The 50-day moving average for HBAN moved below the 200-day moving average on October 05, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HBAN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
HBAN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for HBAN entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. HBAN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 65 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock slightly worse than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 67 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.068) is normal, around the industry mean (1.246). P/E Ratio (11.909) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.829) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.039) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.863) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
PNC's RSI Indicator climbs out of oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for PNC moved out of oversold territory on October 16, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 33 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 23 of the 33 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 70%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on PNC as a result. In 50 of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for PNC just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where PNC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 26 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
Following a +3.09% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PNC advanced for three days, in 179 of 332 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 54%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PNC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
PNC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for PNC entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. PNC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 59 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock slightly worse than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 74 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.389) is normal, around the industry mean (1.246). P/E Ratio (12.260) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.569) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.036) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.762) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
TFC's RSI Oscillator ascends from oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for TFC moved out of oversold territory on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 20 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 14 of the 20 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 70%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TFC as a result. In 54 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TFC just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where TFC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Following a +3.04% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TFC advanced for three days, in 199 of 323 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The 50-day moving average for TFC moved below the 200-day moving average on October 21, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TFC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
TFC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for TFC entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 38 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.994) is normal, around the industry mean (1.246). P/E Ratio (10.823) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.217). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.066) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.044) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.954) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 51 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. TFC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TFC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 57, placing this stock worse than average.
HBAN | PNC | TFC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 60 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 59 | 92 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 6 | 4 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 55 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 34 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TFC's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as HBAN (67) in the Regional Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PNC (74) in the Major Banks industry. This means that TFC's stock grew similarly to HBAN’s and somewhat faster than PNC’s over the last 12 months.
PNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HBAN (65) in the Regional Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (92) in the null industry. This means that PNC's stock grew similarly to HBAN’s and somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.
PNC's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (5) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HBAN (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PNC's stock grew similarly to TFC’s and similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
PNC's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (56) in the null industry, and is in the same range as HBAN (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PNC's stock grew similarly to TFC’s and similarly to HBAN’s over the last 12 months.
HBAN's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNC (34) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as TFC (51) in the null industry. This means that HBAN's stock grew similarly to PNC’s and similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.
| HBAN | PNC | TFC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 64% | 9 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 57% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HBAN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while PNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TFC’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- HBAN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HBAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and TFC’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HBAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
HBAN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.11% price change this week, while PNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.29% , and TFC (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +4.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
HBAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
PNC is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2027.
TFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
HBAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBAN has been closely correlated with FITB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBAN jumps, then FITB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBAN | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| FITB - HBAN | 88% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| RF - HBAN | 85% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| KEY - HBAN | 85% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| PNC - HBAN | 85% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| MTB - HBAN | 84% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||
PNC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNC has been closely correlated with USB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNC jumps, then USB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PNC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PNC | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| USB - PNC | 88% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| HBAN - PNC | 85% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| MTB - PNC | 84% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| FITB - PNC | 84% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TFC - PNC | 84% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
More | ||||
TFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TFC has been closely correlated with RF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TFC jumps, then RF could also see price increases.