KIM
Price
$24.87
Change
-$0.06 (-0.24%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.78B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLD
Price
$140.88
Change
-$0.48 (-0.34%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
131.34B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WY
Price
$23.43
Change
+$0.93 (+4.13%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.91B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

KIM or PLD or WY

KIM vs PLD vs WY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) vs. Prologis, Inc. (PLD) vs. Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • KIM (Kimco Realty Corporation), a retail real estate investment trust (REIT), has delivered strong year-to-date returns exceeding 24% amid robust rent growth and occupancy improvements in grocery-anchored centers.
  • PLD (Prologis, Inc.), an industrial REIT, leads in recent leasing volume and data center development starts, supporting modest guidance raises and solid relative performance.
  • WY (Weyerhaeuser Company), a timberland REIT, shows more modest gains with exposure to cyclical lumber markets and land monetization efforts.
  • Sector exposures differ markedly: KIM benefits from consumer-facing retail stability, PLD from logistics and technology infrastructure demand, while WY faces commodity price volatility.
  • Valuation sensitivities vary, with all three exhibiting interest-rate responsiveness typical of REITs, though PLD demonstrates stronger recent momentum in operational metrics.
  • Market sentiment remains constructive for the REIT sector overall, with relative outperformance tied to subsector-specific catalysts rather than broad market moves.

Introduction

This comparison examines KIM, PLD, and WY—three real estate investment trusts (REITs) operating in distinct property segments. Retail-focused KIM, industrial and logistics leader PLD, and timberland operator WY provide differentiated exposure within the broader real estate and natural resources space. Institutional investors, income-oriented portfolios, and traders seeking sector rotation opportunities may find value in assessing their relative performance, business drivers, and positioning amid evolving economic conditions.

KIM Overview and Recent Performance

Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) owns and operates open-air, grocery-anchored shopping centers and mixed-use properties across the United States. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience, with year-to-date gains outpacing broader benchmarks. First-quarter results highlighted funds from operations (FFO) growth of 4.5% to $0.46 per diluted share, alongside double-digit rent spreads on comparable leases and expansion of the leased-to-economic occupancy spread. These factors supported an upward revision to 2026 net income guidance. Sentiment has benefited from inclusion in defensive indexes and consistent operational execution in a consumer environment favoring necessity-based retail.

PLD Overview and Recent Performance

Prologis, Inc. (PLD) is a leading owner, operator, and developer of industrial logistics properties, with growing involvement in data center build-to-suit projects. Recent weeks featured record leasing activity exceeding 64 million square feet in the first quarter and the initiation of $1.3 billion in data center developments. Core FFO per diluted share rose to $1.50, prompting modest increases to full-year guidance. The stock has posted solid year-to-date returns near 12%, reflecting sustained demand for warehouse and supply-chain infrastructure amid e-commerce and technology sector expansion.

WY Overview and Recent Performance

Weyerhaeuser Company (WY) manages extensive timberlands and produces wood products, functioning as a timberland REIT with additional real estate and climate solutions segments. In recent market activity, performance has been more tempered, with year-to-date returns around 4%. First-quarter results showed adjusted earnings that met or exceeded expectations, supported by land sales and improving lumber momentum in certain segments. The company maintains a focus on sustainable forestry across more than 10 million acres while navigating cyclical commodity dynamics that influence near-term sentiment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many exhibiting win rates in the 60-80% range and varying risk profiles depending on the underlying signals. Traders can explore options tailored to equities like REITs or broader market themes. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to review current selections and performance metrics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business models diverge sharply: KIM generates stable rental income from retail tenants, PLD capitalizes on industrial leasing and development pipelines including data centers, and WY combines timber harvesting with land monetization. Growth drivers include retail rent recovery for KIM, logistics and technology infrastructure for PLD, and housing-related lumber cycles plus non-core asset sales for WY. Recent momentum favors KIM and PLD on operational beats, while WY contends with greater cyclicality. Risk factors encompass interest-rate sensitivity for all three, plus tenant credit for retail, supply-chain shifts for industrial, and commodity price swings for timber. Valuation metrics reflect these differences, with PLD often commanding premiums tied to growth visibility and WY trading at discounts amid sector headwinds. Market sentiment tilts toward the more defensive or infrastructure-linked names in the current environment.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as leasing consistency, guidance revisions, and relative positioning within subsectors, Tickeron’s AI models may currently assign a modest preference to PLD for its stronger operational momentum and exposure to secular demand in logistics and data infrastructure. KIM follows closely due to steady retail fundamentals, while WY appears more sensitive to cyclical variables. These assessments remain probabilistic and subject to evolving market data.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 12, 2026
Stock price -- (KIM: $24.88PLD: $140.87WY: $23.45)
Brand notoriety: KIM and WY are not notable and PLD is notable
KIM represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry, PLD is part of the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry, and WY is in the Specialty Telecommunications industry.
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: KIM: 69%, PLD: 68%, WY: 115%
Market capitalization -- KIM: $16.78B, PLD: $131.34B, WY: $16.91B
KIM [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $16.78B. PLD’s [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] market capitalization is $131.34B. WY [@Specialty Telecommunications] has a market capitalization of $16.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $131.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $103.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.38B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $17.35B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $21.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

KIM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and WY’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • KIM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KIM is a better buy in the long-term than PLD, which in turn is a better option than WY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

KIM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and WY’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • KIM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PLD is a better buy in the short-term than WY, which in turn is a better option than KIM.

Price Growth

KIM (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.74% price change this week, while PLD (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +1.03% , and WY (@Specialty Telecommunications) price fluctuated -1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.54%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

KIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

PLD is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2026.

WY is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.38% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-0.75% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

@Specialty Telecommunications (-0.36% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLD($131B) has a higher market cap than WY($16.9B) and KIM($16.8B). WY has higher P/E ratio than PLD and KIM: WY (41.88) vs PLD (35.39) and KIM (28.60). KIM YTD gains are higher at: 25.474 vs. PLD (12.043) and WY (0.701). PLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.88B vs. KIM (1.48B) and WY (1.11B). WY has less debt than KIM and PLD: WY (5.45B) vs KIM (8.31B) and PLD (34.7B). PLD has higher revenues than WY and KIM: PLD (8.95B) vs WY (6.87B) and KIM (2.16B).
KIMPLDWY
Capitalization16.8B131B16.9B
EBITDA1.48B7.88B1.11B
Gain YTD25.47412.0430.701
P/E Ratio28.6035.3941.88
Revenue2.16B8.95B6.87B
Total Cash168MN/A299M
Total Debt8.31B34.7B5.45B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
KIM vs PLD vs WY: Fundamental Ratings
KIM
PLD
WY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
505050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
93
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6670100
SMR RATING
1..100
848187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
474960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
482674
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a25

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WY's Valuation (30) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (38) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PLD (93). This means that WY's stock grew similarly to KIM’s and somewhat faster than PLD’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLD (70) and is somewhat better than the same rating for WY (100). This means that KIM's stock grew similarly to PLD’s and somewhat faster than WY’s over the last 12 months.

PLD's SMR Rating (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (84) and is in the same range as WY (87). This means that PLD's stock grew similarly to KIM’s and similarly to WY’s over the last 12 months.

KIM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PLD (49) and is in the same range as WY (60). This means that KIM's stock grew similarly to PLD’s and similarly to WY’s over the last 12 months.

PLD's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as KIM (48) and is somewhat better than the same rating for WY (74). This means that PLD's stock grew similarly to KIM’s and somewhat faster than WY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
KIMPLDWY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
KIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BALY12.890.59
+4.80%
Bally's Corporation
BMRA1.690.04
+2.42%
Biomerica
FTV62.201.05
+1.72%
Fortive Corp
ONCY0.89-0.03
-3.55%
Oncolytics Biotech
GRAL72.00-3.79
-5.00%
GRAIL Inc.

WY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WY has been closely correlated with PLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WY jumps, then PLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WY
1D Price
Change %
WY100%
+4.22%
PLD - WY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
TRNO - WY
68%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
FR - WY
68%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
STAG - WY
67%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
REXR - WY
66%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
More