PAGP
Price
$24.74
Change
-$0.64 (-2.52%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.9B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRGP
Price
$256.87
Change
-$11.36 (-4.24%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
55.08B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMB
Price
$70.40
Change
-$1.36 (-1.90%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
86.11B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAGP or TRGP or WMB

PAGP vs TRGP vs WMB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Plains GP Holdings (PAGP) vs. Targa Resources (TRGP) vs. The Williams Companies (WMB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Plains GP Holdings (PAGP), Targa Resources (TRGP), and The Williams Companies (WMB) are all midstream energy companies focused on pipelines, gathering, and processing infrastructure for oil and natural gas.
  • In recent market activity, TRGP has demonstrated the strongest year-to-date and one-year total returns among the three, followed by PAGP, with WMB showing more moderate gains.
  • PAGP recently completed a major divestiture of its Canadian natural gas liquids business, redirecting proceeds toward debt reduction and a sharpened focus on crude oil logistics.
  • TRGP reported record first-quarter 2026 results and raised its full-year financial outlook, supported by volume growth and strategic acquisitions.
  • WMB continues to benefit from expanding natural gas demand and pipeline projects, with analysts maintaining generally positive ratings ahead of its second-quarter earnings release.
  • Relative positioning reflects differences in business mix, with PAGP leaning toward crude, TRGP balanced across natural gas liquids and gas, and WMB heavily weighted toward natural gas transmission.

Introduction

Midstream energy infrastructure companies provide essential transportation and processing services that connect producers to end markets, offering relatively stable cash flows compared with upstream exploration and production. Plains GP Holdings (PAGP), Targa Resources (TRGP), and The Williams Companies (WMB) represent three prominent players in this sector. This comparison examines their recent performance, business models, and market positioning to assist investors and traders evaluating exposure to energy infrastructure amid fluctuating commodity prices and shifting demand patterns for oil and natural gas.

PAGP Overview and Recent Performance

Plains GP Holdings (PAGP) operates as a master limited partnership focused on crude oil transportation, storage, and logistics primarily in North America. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near the upper end of its 52-week range, reflecting investor response to the completed sale of its Canadian natural gas liquids business and an upward revision to full-year 2026 adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization guidance. These developments have supported sentiment by simplifying the business model and improving the balance sheet through debt reduction. Broader market activity has been influenced by stable crude demand and analyst price target increases from several firms.

TRGP Overview and Recent Performance

Targa Resources (TRGP) engages in natural gas gathering, processing, and transportation, with significant exposure to natural gas liquids. Recent market activity has featured continued momentum following record first-quarter 2026 financial results and an increased 2026 financial outlook. The company also declared a quarterly dividend of $1.25 per share in July. Performance has been supported by volume growth, prior acquisitions such as Stakeholder Midstream, and expectations ahead of the upcoming second-quarter earnings report. Overall sentiment remains constructive amid favorable natural gas liquids pricing dynamics.

WMB Overview and Recent Performance

The Williams Companies (WMB) focuses on natural gas pipelines, gathering, and processing, serving as a key transporter in major U.S. basins. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced some consolidation after earlier gains, with attention centered on upcoming second-quarter earnings and ongoing pipeline expansion projects tied to rising natural gas demand. Analyst commentary has remained largely favorable, with several firms raising price targets. Market positioning benefits from the company’s scale in transmission infrastructure, though near-term price action has been more tempered relative to peers.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights a curated selection of AI trading bots from a broader universe of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, including consistent trend capture, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability across different timeframes and strategies, are featured in this section. Available bots span a wide range of performance metrics, with many showing annualized returns in the double to triple digits alongside varying drawdown profiles and win rates depending on their specific trading styles. All bots operate with distinct strategies, time horizons, and ticker sets. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and suitability assessments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business models differ in emphasis: PAGP centers on crude oil midstream assets, TRGP maintains balanced exposure across natural gas and natural gas liquids, and WMB is predominantly oriented toward natural gas transmission. Growth drivers reflect these focuses, with PAGP benefiting from crude optimization post-divestiture, TRGP from liquids and gas volume expansion, and WMB from pipeline capacity additions amid sustained natural gas demand. Recent momentum has favored TRGP and PAGP over WMB in total return terms. Risk factors include commodity price sensitivity for all three, though leverage profiles and contract structures provide varying degrees of insulation. Valuation sensitivity appears higher for names with stronger recent run-ups, while market sentiment has been supported by sector-wide infrastructure tailwinds without clear favoritism in analyst coverage.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning within the midstream sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of outperformance to Targa Resources (TRGP) over the near term, followed closely by Plains GP Holdings (PAGP), with The Williams Companies (WMB) positioned more neutrally amid upcoming earnings and consolidation. This assessment draws from recent volume growth, outlook revisions, and return differentials rather than forward projections.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2026
Stock price -- (PAGP: $24.74TRGP: $256.87WMB: $70.40)
Brand notoriety: PAGP and TRGP are notable and WMB is not notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAGP: 106%, TRGP: 134%, WMB: 64%
Market capitalization -- PAGP: $4.9B, TRGP: $55.08B, WMB: $86.11B
$PAGP is valued at $4.9B, while TRGP has a market capitalization of $55.08B, and WMB's market capitalization is $86.11B. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Pipelines ranges from $111.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry is $16.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAGP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRGP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and WMB’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRGP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRGP is a better buy in the long-term than PAGP, which in turn is a better option than WMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAGP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WMB’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TRGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WMB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAGP is a better buy in the short-term than TRGP and WMB.

Price Growth

PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -6.04% price change this week, while TRGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -4.99% , and WMB (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price fluctuated -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

TRGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

WMB is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-1.47% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMB($86.1B) has a higher market cap than TRGP($55.1B) and PAGP($4.9B). PAGP has higher P/E ratio than WMB and TRGP: PAGP (29.81) vs WMB (28.05) and TRGP (24.56). TRGP YTD gains are higher at: 41.280 vs. PAGP (36.336) and WMB (18.832). WMB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.67B vs. TRGP (5.22B) and PAGP (2.81B). PAGP has less debt than TRGP and WMB: PAGP (11.6B) vs TRGP (19.1B) and WMB (30.3B). PAGP has higher revenues than TRGP and WMB: PAGP (45.3B) vs TRGP (16.6B) and WMB (11.9B).
PAGPTRGPWMB
Capitalization4.9B55.1B86.1B
EBITDA2.81B5.22B7.67B
Gain YTD36.33641.28018.832
P/E Ratio29.8124.5628.05
Revenue45.3B16.6B11.9B
Total CashN/A100MN/A
Total Debt11.6B19.1B30.3B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAGP vs TRGP vs WMB: Fundamental Ratings
PAGP
TRGP
WMB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
507882
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
482
SMR RATING
1..100
571644
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
454653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
384856
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
501750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAGP's Valuation (8) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (23) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is in the same range as TRGP (31) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that PAGP's stock grew similarly to WMB’s and similarly to TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

WMB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as PAGP (4) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is in the same range as TRGP (8) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that WMB's stock grew similarly to PAGP’s and similarly to TRGP’s over the last 12 months.

TRGP's SMR Rating (16) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as WMB (44) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for PAGP (57) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that TRGP's stock grew similarly to WMB’s and somewhat faster than PAGP’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as TRGP (46) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is in the same range as WMB (53) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that PAGP's stock grew similarly to TRGP’s and similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as TRGP (48) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is in the same range as WMB (56) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that PAGP's stock grew similarly to TRGP’s and similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAGPTRGPWMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RAIL7.940.23
+2.98%
FreightCar America
RES5.87-0.02
-0.34%
RPC
ENIC4.54-0.03
-0.66%
Enel Chile SA
ENB51.28-0.42
-0.81%
Enbridge
PLSM3.31-0.12
-3.50%
Pulsenmore Ltd.

PAGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAGP has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAGP jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAGP
1D Price
Change %
PAGP100%
-2.52%
PAA - PAGP
96%
Closely correlated
-3.02%
EPD - PAGP
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
OKE - PAGP
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
TRGP - PAGP
55%
Loosely correlated
-4.24%
WES - PAGP
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
More

TRGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRGP has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRGP jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRGP
1D Price
Change %
TRGP100%
-4.24%
OKE - TRGP
72%
Closely correlated
-1.72%
KMI - TRGP
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.37%
AM - TRGP
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
WMB - TRGP
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
DTM - TRGP
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
More

WMB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMB has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WMB jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMB
1D Price
Change %
WMB100%
-1.90%
KMI - WMB
80%
Closely correlated
-1.37%
AM - WMB
78%
Closely correlated
-1.02%
DTM - WMB
75%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
TRGP - WMB
58%
Loosely correlated
-4.24%
OKE - WMB
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
More