Advertisement
QBTS or QUBT or RGTI
Which Stock Would AI Choose? D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) vs. Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) vs. Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- QBTS leads with strong recent momentum, up over 70% in the past month amid sector rallies and key acquisitions like Quantum Circuits Inc., boosting its dual-platform quantum strategy.
- QUBT shows solid one-month gains around 32%, supported by photonic advancements such as the deployment-ready NeuraWave platform and partnerships like Ciena for quantum-secured communications.
- RGTI has gained about 25% recently, driven by launches like the 108-qubit Cepheus system and major contracts, including an $8.4 million deal with India's C-DAC.
- All three stocks operate in the high-growth quantum computing sector but face volatility; QBTS holds the largest market cap at $8.36B, followed by RGTI ($6.29B) and QUBT ($2.17B).
- Year-to-date, performances vary: QBTS +13.69%, RGTI +14.49%, QUBT +6.43%, reflecting broader market positioning in quantum technologies.
- Recent developments highlight commercialization progress, with cloud services and hardware sales influencing relative performance and investor sentiment.
Introduction
Quantum computing stocks like QBTS, QUBT, and RGTI have captured attention amid accelerating advancements in the sector. These companies develop hardware, software, and services leveraging quantum principles for complex computations beyond classical computers' reach. Traders seeking high-growth opportunities in emerging tech and investors eyeing long-term disruption in AI, optimization, and cybersecurity will find this comparison valuable. Recent market activity, including sector-wide rallies tied to hardware milestones and partnerships, underscores their relative performance and positioning in a volatile but promising field.
QBTS Overview and Recent Performance
D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) pioneers annealing quantum computing systems, software, and cloud services for optimization problems in logistics, finance, and materials science. Founded in 1999 and headquartered in Palo Alto, California, it offers the Advantage series and Leap quantum cloud service. In recent market activity, QBTS shares surged over 70% in the past month, trading around $22.57 with a $8.36B market cap. This momentum stems from the acquisition of Quantum Circuits Inc., accelerating its gate-model capabilities alongside annealing tech, and strong fiscal 2025 revenue growth of 179% year-over-year to $24.6 million. Bookings hit $32.8 million early in 2026, including a $20 million system sale, fueling positive sentiment despite ongoing losses and YTD gains of 13.69%.
QUBT Overview and Recent Performance
Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT), based in Hoboken, New Jersey, specializes in integrated photonics for room-temperature quantum machines targeting optimization, AI, cybersecurity, and sensing. Its portfolio includes thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) chips, Emucore reservoir computing, and NeuraWave for edge AI inference. Recent weeks saw QUBT rise about 32% monthly, closing near $9.60 with a $2.17B market cap. Key drivers include the deployment-ready NeuraWave platform, a Ciena partnership for quantum-secured high-speed communications demonstrated at OFC 2026, and Fab 1 revenues from TFLN production. Capital raises exceeding $1.5 billion bolster its balance sheet, supporting commercialization amid YTD returns of 6.43% and persistent losses.
RGTI Overview and Recent Performance
Rigetti Computing, Inc. (RGTI), headquartered in Berkeley, California, builds full-stack superconducting quantum processors and systems, offering quantum processing units (QPUs) like Novera (9-qubit) and Ankaa-3 (84-qubit) via Quantum Computing as a Service (QCaaS). Recent performance featured a 25% monthly gain, with shares at $18.94 and $6.29B market cap. Catalysts include the 108-qubit Cepheus-1 launch on its cloud and Amazon Braket, an $8.4 million order from India's C-DAC for on-premises deployment, and plans for a 1,000+ qubit UK system. These bolster commercial traction, contributing to YTD gains of 14.49% despite revenue dips and operating losses.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of over 350, spotlighting 25 standout performers suited to current market dynamics like semiconductor surges, space infrastructure, and leveraged ETFs. These bots, which trade across thousands of tickers spanning sectors such as tech, energy, industrials, and mining, showcase impressive stats: annualized returns up to +285%, win rates from 51% to 88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7. Each employs unique strategies—momentum, pattern recognition, or sector rotation—across timeframes from intraday to swing trades. Traders can explore these audited performers for real-time signals and copy trading, potentially enhancing decision-making in volatile environments like quantum stocks. Visit Trending AI Robots to review top options and align with market trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business models, QBTS emphasizes annealing for immediate optimization use cases with cloud access, contrasting RGTI's gate-model superconducting focus on scalable QPUs and QUBT's photonics for room-temperature applications in AI and sensing. Growth drivers differ: QBTS leverages acquisitions for dual platforms, RGTI secures government contracts, and QUBT advances TFLN fabrication. Recent momentum favors QBTS (71% monthly), ahead of QUBT (32%) and RGTI (25%). Risk factors include high cash burn and execution hurdles across all, amplified by QUBT's smaller scale. Sector exposure is purely quantum, but valuation sensitivity is acute given negative earnings; QBTS's larger cap implies relative stability. Market sentiment tilts toward hardware milestones, trading off commercialization speed versus long-term scalability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors QBTS due to its superior recent trend consistency, with 70%+ monthly gains outpacing peers, backed by robust bookings and strategic acquisitions enhancing its hybrid quantum positioning. Relative stability from a leading market cap and commercial traction via Leap cloud services provide probabilistic edge over RGTI's contract wins and QUBT's photonic innovations, amid sector catalysts like Nvidia's quantum tools.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QBTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQUBT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and RGTI’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- QBTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QUBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RGTI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QBTS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QUBT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and RGTI’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QBTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QUBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RGTI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QBTS (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +4.55% price change this week, while QUBT (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +3.66% , and RGTI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price fluctuated +3.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
QBTS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
QUBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.
RGTI is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Processing Hardware (-0.82% weekly)Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
| QBTS | QUBT | RGTI | |
| Capitalization | 9.27B | 2.37B | 7.07B |
| EBITDA | -386.5M | -33.34M | -211.57M |
| Gain YTD | -6.424 | 2.729 | -3.476 |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Revenue | 12.4M | 4.33M | 10M |
| Total Cash | 588M | 986M | 418M |
| Total Debt | 46.8M | 3.68M | 6.78M |
QUBT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QBTS | QUBT | RGTI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A | 2 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 86% | 9 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
QBTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QBTS has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QBTS jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QBTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QBTS | 100% | -0.89% | ||
| RGTI - QBTS | 89% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| IONQ - QBTS | 81% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| QUBT - QBTS | 80% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| QMCO - QBTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -9.74% | ||
| CAN - QBTS | 50% Loosely correlated | +7.61% | ||
More | ||||
QUBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been closely correlated with RGTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then RGTI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUBT | 100% | -2.04% | ||
| RGTI - QUBT | 80% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| QBTS - QUBT | 80% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| IONQ - QUBT | 74% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| QMCO - QUBT | 54% Loosely correlated | -9.74% | ||
| UMAC - QUBT | 50% Loosely correlated | -9.65% | ||
More | ||||
RGTI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGTI has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGTI jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RGTI | 100% | +0.09% | ||
| QBTS - RGTI | 89% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| IONQ - RGTI | 82% Closely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| QUBT - RGTI | 80% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| QMCO - RGTI | 52% Loosely correlated | -9.74% | ||
| CAN - RGTI | 51% Loosely correlated | +7.61% | ||
More | ||||