H.B. Fuller Company, a global leader in adhesives and specialty chemical solutions, reported results for its fiscal second quarter ended May 30, 2026. This period is critical for investors as it reflects demand trends across construction, packaging, and industrial end markets. Recent quarters showed mixed organic growth amid pricing actions and volume recovery, making year-over-year comparisons and guidance updates key indicators of operational momentum and margin expansion potential.
Net revenue came in at $950 million, increasing 5.8% from the year-ago period, with organic revenue advancing 2.6%. Reported diluted earnings per share reached $1.23, while adjusted diluted EPS rose 19% to $1.41. Net income was $68 million. Adjusted EBITDA grew 9% to $181 million, supported by higher volumes and operational efficiencies. The company also achieved record second-quarter operating cash flow and bought back 750,000 shares. Management raised the midpoints of its full-year guidance for adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EPS. I checked the broader sector context using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how these results compare with peers.
Shares of FUL typically move on earnings beats and guidance updates. The combination of revenue growth, strong adjusted EPS gains, and raised full-year targets is likely to support positive sentiment. Investors will focus on how the results align with broader industrial demand trends and whether the beat reflects sustainable volume recovery or one-time factors.
Investors should watch for continued organic revenue trends in the company’s core end markets, including construction and packaging. Management’s decision to raise full-year adjusted EBITDA and EPS guidance suggests confidence in margin expansion and cost control.
Operating cash flow performance and share repurchase activity provide additional signals of balance sheet strength. Monitoring raw material costs, pricing power, and any updates on acquisition integration will help assess sustainability of recent momentum.
Broader industry conditions, such as construction spending and industrial production data, remain relevant for demand visibility. The company’s fiscal third quarter results, expected in late September 2026, will offer further insight into seasonal patterns and guidance execution.
One thing that stands out when reviewing these results is how helpful pattern recognition can be for confirming momentum. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Trend Prediction Engine to see how the stock compares to others in the industry. From what I see, combining the earnings data with these signals gives a clearer picture of potential follow-through.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsFinancial writer and active order flow futures trader with a focus on fundamental analysis, macroeconomic factors, and equity research. I make in-depth blogs on stocks and ETFs, bridging the gap between raw market data and real-world trading decisions.
The 50-day moving average for FUL moved below the 200-day moving average on July 22, 2026. This could be a long-term bearish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an downward trend.
The 10-day RSI Indicator for FUL moved out of overbought territory on August 18, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 26 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In of the 26 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at .
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 20, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FUL as a result. In of 82 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FUL turned negative on August 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
FUL moved below its 50-day moving average on August 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FUL declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
FUL broke above its upper Bollinger Band on August 07, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FUL entered a downward trend on August 04, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The 10-day moving average for FUL crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on August 13, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In of 21 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FUL advanced for three days, in of 287 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.516) is normal, around the industry mean (7.001). P/E Ratio (17.418) is within average values for comparable stocks, (39.393). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (2.393). Dividend Yield (0.016) settles around the average of (0.019) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.925) is also within normal values, averaging (70.976).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. FUL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FUL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 81, placing this stock worse than average.
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a manufacturer of adhesives, sealants and other chemical products
Industry ChemicalsSpecialty