CELH
Price
$50.12
Change
+$7.38 (+17.27%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
19.3B
89 days until earnings call
MNST
Price
$60.85
Change
+$1.35 (+2.27%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
62.08B
Earnings call today
Interact to see
Advertisement

CELH vs MNST

Header iconCELH vs MNST Comparison
Open Charts CELH vs MNSTBanner chart's image
Celsius Holdings
Price$50.12
Change+$7.38 (+17.27%)
Volume$23.74M
Capitalization19.3B
Monster Beverage
Price$60.85
Change+$1.35 (+2.27%)
Volume$213.13K
Capitalization62.08B
CELH vs MNST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CELH vs. MNST commentary
Aug 08, 2025

CELH and MNST are developers of specialty beverages marketed as energy drinks primarily. CELH is significantly smaller, with a market cap at the time of this writing of approximately $6B compared to MNST’s $50B. CELH currently has about 5 types of beverages in various flavors distributed almost exclusively in North America, but they acquired a Nordic distributor in 2019 which is intended to propel them into the European market. CELH’s beverages use naturally-based and nutritious ingredients which stimulate the body’s ability to burn calories during a workout while increasing endurance. MNST is not partial to natural or artificial ingredients and has branched out from flavored energy soda-like beverages to canned coffee drinks and other alternative beverages. MNST sells its products to large distributors, with sales to Coca-Cola bottling groups accounting for about 30% of its net income in 2020. MNST shows a much higher ROA and ROE than CELH currently, as well as significantly higher margins.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CELH: $50.12 vs. MNST: $60.80)
Brand notoriety: CELH and MNST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CELH: 367% vs. MNST: 149%
Market capitalization -- CELH: $19.3B vs. MNST: $62.08B
CELH [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $19.3B. MNST’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $62.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $24.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CELH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMNST’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CELH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MNST’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CELH and MNST are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CELH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNST’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CELH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MNST’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CELH is a better buy in the short-term than MNST.

Price Growth

CELH (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +10.54% price change this week, while MNST (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +3.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +4.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

CELH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

MNST is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+4.10% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNST($62.1B) has a higher market cap than CELH($19.3B). CELH has higher P/E ratio than MNST: CELH (107.25) vs MNST (37.49). CELH YTD gains are higher at: 90.281 vs. MNST (13.204). MNST has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.02B vs. CELH (270M). MNST has more cash in the bank: 3.25B vs. CELH (756M). CELH has less debt than MNST: CELH (2.19M) vs MNST (30.3M). MNST has higher revenues than CELH: MNST (7.14B) vs CELH (1.32B).
CELHMNSTCELH / MNST
Capitalization19.3B62.1B31%
EBITDA270M2.02B13%
Gain YTD90.28113.204684%
P/E Ratio107.2537.49286%
Revenue1.32B7.14B18%
Total Cash756M3.25B23%
Total Debt2.19M30.3M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CELH vs MNST: Fundamental Ratings
CELH
MNST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5829
SMR RATING
1..100
4645
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4252
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
530
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MNST's Valuation (92) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (95). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (58). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

MNST's SMR Rating (45) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as CELH (46). This means that MNST’s stock grew similarly to CELH’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (52). This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

CELH's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Beverages Non Alcoholic industry is in the same range as MNST (30). This means that CELH’s stock grew similarly to MNST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CELHMNST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CELH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLTW54.230.19
+0.35%
Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF
IDRV32.730.04
+0.12%
iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF
CGCP22.58N/A
N/A
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF
LIAM200.19N/A
N/A
LifeX 2055 Infl-Prt Longevity Inc ETF
FDRV15.05-0.07
-0.44%
Fidelity Elctrc Vhcls & Ftr Trnsptn ETF

CELH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CELH and MNST have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CELH and MNST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CELH
1D Price
Change %
CELH100%
+17.27%
MNST - CELH
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
CCEP - CELH
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
KDP - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
KO - CELH
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
PEP - CELH
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
More

MNST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNST has been loosely correlated with PEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNST jumps, then PEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNST
1D Price
Change %
MNST100%
+0.78%
PEP - MNST
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
KDP - MNST
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
KO - MNST
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CCEP - MNST
43%
Loosely correlated
-7.13%
FIZZ - MNST
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More