ARES
Price
$116.03
Change
-$1.70 (-1.44%)
Updated
Oct 7, 11:02 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
26.92B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BN
Price
$36.73
Change
-$0.57 (-1.53%)
Updated
Oct 7, 12:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
81.03B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TPG
Price
$44.19
Change
-$0.78 (-1.73%)
Updated
Oct 7, 12:12 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.25B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARES or BN or TPG

ARES vs BN vs TPG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs. Brookfield Corporation (BN) vs. TPG Inc. (TPG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the largest of the three by assets under management (AUM), with a franchise anchored in private credit.
  • Brookfield Corporation (BN) blends asset management, insurance and wealth solutions, and direct ownership of real-asset operating businesses.
  • TPG Inc. (TPG) is the smallest but is growing fastest in percentage terms across fundraising, deployment, and realizations.
  • All three have faced valuation and sentiment pressure in recent weeks despite resilient underlying fundamentals.
  • Business-model mix differs sharply: credit-led (ARES) versus real assets and insurance (BN) versus growth-oriented private equity (TPG).
  • Relative positioning hinges on trend consistency and catalysts rather than on a single financial metric.

Introduction

Alternative asset managers have become a focal point for investors seeking exposure to private credit, real assets, and institutional capital flows. This stock comparison examines three prominent but structurally different firms: Ares Management Corporation, Brookfield Corporation, and TPG Inc. Each operates across billions in AUM (assets under management), yet their growth drivers, sector exposure, and market positioning diverge meaningfully. A trader evaluating relative performance and momentum, or a longer-term investor assessing business-model durability, may find this comparison useful for understanding how each name responds to shifting rates, fundraising cycles, and market sentiment.

ARES Overview and Recent Performance

Ares Management Corporation is a leading global alternative investment manager with a platform spanning credit, real estate, private equity, and infrastructure. Credit remains its defining strength, positioning the firm as one of the largest players in private credit. In its most recent quarterly report, Ares highlighted record fundraising and a growing investment pipeline, with AUM exceeding $671 billion and substantial uninvested capital, or "dry powder," available for deployment. Fee-related earnings and after-tax realized income both advanced year over year.

Recent market activity has been mixed for ARES. After a strong start to the year, momentum cooled in recent weeks, with the shares trading well below their 52-week high even as analyst coverage remains broadly positive, including new coverage with an overweight-style rating. Sentiment has been shaped by broader scrutiny of private credit, offset by resilient institutional fundraising and a stable dividend.

BN Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Corporation is a global investment firm that combines an asset-management business with wealth and insurance solutions and direct ownership of operating businesses across infrastructure, renewable energy, real estate, and private equity. This diversified structure distinguishes it from pure asset managers. Recent quarters featured record fundraising, a completed acquisition of credit manager Oaktree, and expansion of its insurance assets through the Just Group transaction. Management has emphasized artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure as a multi-year growth theme, alongside a sizable pool of deployable capital.

For BN, recent performance reflects a reacceleration in distributable earnings driven by asset management and wealth solutions. The shares have traded below management's own estimates of intrinsic value, a gap the firm has addressed in part through share repurchases. Sentiment is supported by recurring, fee-like earnings and long-duration capital, though the broad structure can make valuation and near-term catalysts less straightforward to assess.

TPG Overview and Recent Performance

TPG Inc. is a global alternative asset manager founded in 1992, known for growth-oriented private equity, credit, real estate, and a platform spanning healthcare, software, and enterprise technology. In its most recent results, TPG reported AUM of roughly $306 billion, up more than 20% year over year. Notably, fee-related earnings surpassed $1 billion on a trailing twelve-month basis for the first time, and the firm posted sharp increases in capital formation, deployment, and realization activity.

TPG has experienced pronounced volatility in recent market activity. While the firm has outperformed on several operating metrics, the shares have traded well off their 52-week high, and analyst sentiment is split between buy and hold ratings. The firm's software and growth-focused portfolio creates sensitivity to multiple compression, even as management points to resilient bookings and healthy credit portfolios.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers. Because only a subset of these bots aligns with prevailing market conditions, Tickeron curates the strongest performers into a dedicated Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the specific sets of tickers they trade, with many reporting measurable win rates, trade frequency, and historical return ranges. For traders comparing names such as ARES, BN, and TPG, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can provide a data-driven perspective on which signals and setups are currently favored.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The three companies compete for the same institutional capital but occupy different parts of the alternative-asset landscape. ARES offers the most concentrated exposure to private credit, where fee-related earnings are comparatively stable but subject to industry-wide scrutiny around lending standards. BN provides the greatest diversification, mixing asset management with insurance and real-asset ownership, which can smooth earnings but also complicates valuation and obscures near-term catalysts. TPG carries the highest growth profile on a percentage basis, yet its growth-oriented private equity and software exposure leaves it more sensitive to valuation multiples and market risk appetite.

On momentum, all three have cooled from prior highs, though the drivers differ: ARES faces private-credit sentiment risk, BN faces a perceived discount to intrinsic value, and TPG faces multiple compression in its growth portfolio. On risk, ARES and TPG are more sensitive to fundraising and fee dynamics, while BN's insurance and operating businesses introduce credit, interest-rate, and real-asset sensitivities. For market positioning, ARES leads in credit scale, BN in structural diversification, and TPG in growth velocity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability of earnings, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward ARES in the current environment. The firm combines the largest AUM base, record fundraising, and a comparatively stable fee stream, while its defining private-credit franchise continues to demonstrate resilience despite sector-wide scrutiny. That said, the verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive: BN offers a stronger diversification and long-duration capital story, and TPG presents the most pronounced growth and momentum potential if risk appetite improves. AI-driven rankings can shift as trend signals, volatility, and catalysts evolve.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5610
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6760
SMR RATING
1..100
9587
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6073
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ARES's Valuation (11) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (77). This means that ARES’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (67). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

BN's SMR Rating (87) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ARES (95). This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (73). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (95). This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARESBNTPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2026
Stock price -- (ARES: $117.74, BN: $37.29, TPG: $44.97)
Brand notoriety: ARES, BN and TPG are all not notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 91%, BN: 91%, TPG: 79%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $26.92B, BN: $81.03B, TPG: $7.25B
$ARES is valued at $26.92B, while BN has a market capitalization of $81.03B, and TPG's market capitalization is $7.25B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $57 to $165.9B. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $8.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while BN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and TPG’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TPG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TPG is a better buy in the long-term than ARES, which in turn is a better option than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TPG’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARES’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TPG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the short-term than ARES and TPG.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.19% , and TPG (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

TPG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.97% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ARES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TPG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TOPS0.54N/A
+0.30%
TOP Ships
CDNL28.720.01
+0.03%
Cardinal Infrastructure Group Inc
AKR18.39-0.02
-0.11%
Acadia Realty Trust
W105.45-0.60
-0.57%
Wayfair
NRXS6.78-0.37
-5.17%
Neuraxis

ARES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARES
1D Price
Change %
ARES100%
+0.52%
KKR - ARES
83%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
BX - ARES
80%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
TPG - ARES
79%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
OWL - ARES
78%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
APO - ARES
78%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
More