BAM
Price
$45.25
Change
-$0.58 (-1.27%)
Updated
Oct 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
71.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CG
Price
$37.25
Change
-$1.00 (-2.61%)
Updated
Oct 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.08B
23 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KKR
Price
$87.17
Change
-$4.34 (-4.74%)
Updated
Oct 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
83.7B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM or CG or KKR

BAM vs CG vs KKR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 28, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. The Carlyle Group (CG) vs. KKR & Co. (KKR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • All three are leading global alternative asset managers, but they differ sharply in scale: KKR reports roughly $758 billion in assets under management (AUM), BAM about $672 billion in fee-bearing capital, and CG around $485 billion in total AUM.
  • Recent stock performance has diverged, with CG and KKR down more sharply year to date than BAM, which has shown relatively more resilience.
  • BAM has benefited from record fundraising, insurance-related inflows, and an expanding artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure platform, including the completion of its Oaktree acquisition.
  • KKR combines strong fee-related earnings growth and a large perpetual-capital base, but management has tempered its 2026 adjusted net income outlook.
  • CG trades at a lower valuation relative to peers and is executing on 2028 targets, yet its growth has lagged the group in recent periods.
  • All three remain sensitive to monetization cycles, credit-market conditions, and capital-markets activity.

Introduction

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), The Carlyle Group (CG), and KKR & Co. (KKR) are three of the most closely watched names in alternative asset management, a segment that has become central to institutional and individual portfolios alike. Comparing them is useful for investors who want exposure to private equity, private credit, infrastructure, real assets, and wealth channels but who must weigh differences in scale, growth momentum, valuation, and risk. In recent weeks, all three stocks have pulled back alongside broader market volatility, even as their underlying businesses continue to grow fee-based revenue. This stock comparison examines each firm's recent performance, business positioning, and relative momentum to help traders and investors understand how they stack up in the current market environment.

BAM Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Asset Management is a global alternative asset manager focused on real assets, infrastructure, renewable power, private equity, and credit, with a growing private-wealth and insurance franchise. The firm's scale and diversification have been reinforced by its completed acquisition of Oaktree, a credit specialist, which broadens its fee-bearing capital base. In its most recent quarter, BAM reported fee-related earnings (FRE, earnings generated from recurring management fees) of $808 million, up 20% year over year, and distributable earnings (DE, cash earnings available for distribution) of $707 million. Fee-bearing capital reached $672 billion, supported by a record fundraising quarter that included a $40 billion insurance mandate from Just Group. Sentiment has also been shaped by BAM's expanding AI infrastructure strategy: its dedicated fund, targeting $10 billion of equity commitments, is positioned to anchor a program pursuing roughly $100 billion of opportunities across data centers, power, and compute. In recent weeks, however, the stock has pulled back from its highs, reflecting broader market pressure on alternative-asset managers despite generally constructive fundamentals.

CG Overview and Recent Performance

The Carlyle Group is a global investment firm that deploys private capital across three segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit, and Carlyle AlpInvest, which focuses on secondaries and co-investments. In its most recent quarter, CG posted post-tax distributable earnings of $1.07 per share, comfortably above consensus estimates, supported by higher realized performance revenues and fee-related performance revenues. Total AUM rose 4% year over year to about $485.5 billion, with pending fee-earning AUM up 57%. The firm has continued to expand into wealth management, completing a majority investment in MAI Capital Management, and has maintained capital returns through a $0.35 quarterly dividend and share repurchases. Despite these developments, CG's stock has underperformed in recent weeks, declining more sharply than peers, and analysts have noted that its revenue growth has been slower than the group average. Piper Sandler recently initiated coverage with an Overweight rating, arguing the shares are "too cheap to ignore," while management has reiterated confidence in its 2028 earnings targets.

KKR Overview and Recent Performance

KKR & Co. is a diversified global investment firm spanning private equity, real assets, credit, insurance, and wealth solutions. The firm reported a record quarter recently, with record fee-related earnings, strong fundraising, and record monetization activity, while AUM climbed to approximately $758 billion. KKR's fee base is notably diversified, with private equity, real assets, and credit each contributing roughly one-third of total fees. The firm has expanded through acquisitions, including the completion of its Arctos Partners purchase, which added about $16 billion in AUM in sports and sponsor solutions, and through landmark transactions such as a $16 billion lease-and-lease-back joint venture with Kuwait Oil Company alongside other global investors. At the same time, management has acknowledged reduced visibility on monetization timing and indicated its 2026 adjusted net income (ANI, a measure of total after-tax earnings power) target of more than $7 per share is now "more likely" to come in below that level. KKR's stock has declined significantly year to date, with the pullback partly reflecting this tempered outlook even as fee growth remains strong.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron operates hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance profile, and set of symbols it follows. Because market conditions change constantly, only a subset of these bots is well suited to the current environment at any given moment. The Trending AI Robots page curates precisely that group: the strongest-performing, most relevant bots selected to match today's market conditions rather than the entire catalog. The featured bots span a range of approaches, from swing and trend-following strategies to intraday setups, with varied historical performance statistics and risk profiles. For traders and investors comparing stocks like BAM, CG, and KKR, exploring this curated selection can help identify automated strategies aligned with current momentum. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to review the latest selection and performance data.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The three firms share a common business model—earning management fees on committed capital plus performance-related income—but differ in emphasis and trajectory. KKR is the largest by AUM and has the most diversified fee mix, with meaningful exposure to perpetual capital, insurance, and strategic holdings; this supports fee stability but also leaves earnings sensitive to monetization timing. BAM is weighted toward real assets, infrastructure, and credit, and its insurance inflows and AI infrastructure program provide long-duration, recurring fee streams that have supported relatively steadier fundamentals. CG remains more private-equity-centric, with its Global Credit and AlpInvest segments growing faster and helping offset a softer private equity contribution. On valuation, CG trades at a discount to the group, while BAM and KKR command higher multiples reflecting their scale and growth. In terms of recent momentum, BAM has held up better, whereas CG and KKR have seen steeper year-to-date declines. Common risk factors include credit-market tightening, slower fundraising, and delays in realizations, all of which can compress performance fees and sentiment across the sector.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, fee-growth durability, catalyst visibility, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor BAM over CG and KKR in the current environment. BAM's record fundraising, insurance-related inflows, completed Oaktree integration, and rapidly scaling AI infrastructure platform point to more consistent, longer-duration fee growth than its peers, while its share price has shown relatively greater stability during the recent pullback. KKR remains a strong franchise but carries the overhang of a tempered near-term earnings outlook, and CG offers attractive valuation yet slower growth momentum. These assessments are probabilistic rather than definitive: conditions can shift quickly, and no single factor guarantees future relative performance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs CG vs KKR: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
CG
KKR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
705661
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10010075
SMR RATING
1..100
295967
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
587762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84692
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
415090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CG's Valuation (12) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (14) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (81) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CG's stock grew similarly to BAM’s and significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.

KKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (100) in the Investment Managers industry, and is in the same range as BAM (100) in the null industry. This means that KKR's stock grew similarly to CG’s and similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as CG (59) in the Investment Managers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (67) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM's stock grew similarly to CG’s and somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as KKR (62) in the Investment Managers industry, and is in the same range as CG (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM's stock grew similarly to KKR’s and similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BAM (84) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that CG's stock grew significantly faster than BAM’s and significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMCGKKR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 13, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $45.83, CG: $38.25, KKR: $91.51)
Brand notoriety: BAM, CG and KKR are all not notable
The three companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 73%, CG: 70%, KKR: 127%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $71.02B, CG: $14.08B, KKR: $83.7B
$BAM is valued at $71.02B, while CG has a market capitalization of $14.08B, and KKR's market capitalization is $83.7B. The market cap for tickers in this @Investment Managers ranges from $57 to $165.9B. The average market capitalization across the @Investment Managers industry is $8.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while CG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and KKR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM and CG are a better buy in the long-term than KKR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and KKR’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KKR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM, CG and KKR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while CG (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.72% , and KKR (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +1.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

KKR is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-4.47% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KKR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNC67.021.66
+2.54%
Centene Corp
SITE87.990.83
+0.95%
SiteOne Landscape Supply
GDEV11.210.01
+0.09%
GDEV Inc
HIND2.00-0.06
-2.91%
Vyome Holdings Inc
RZLV1.75-0.16
-8.38%
Rezolve AI PLC

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-0.11%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
KKR - BAM
76%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
BX - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
ARES - BAM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
TPG - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
More

KKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KKR
1D Price
Change %
KKR100%
+0.62%
BX - KKR
83%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
ARES - KKR
83%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
APO - KKR
82%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
TPG - KKR
78%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
CG - KKR
76%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More