Advertisement
BLK or BN or STT
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BLK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and STT’s FA Score reflects 5 green FA rating(s).
- BLK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STT’s FA Score: 5 green, 0 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BLK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and STT’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BLK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- STT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BLK (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.54% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.49% , and STT (@Investment Managers) price fluctuated +1.59% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.36%.
Reported Earning Dates
BLK is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.
BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.
STT is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-0.87% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| BLK | BN | STT | |
| Capitalization | 164B | 102B | 50.9B |
| EBITDA | 10.6B | 33.1B | N/A |
| Gain YTD | -0.263 | -8.892 | 46.343 |
| P/E Ratio | 25.30 | 81.71 | 16.36 |
| Revenue | 25.6B | 75.7B | 14.5B |
| Total Cash | 13.1B | N/A | 6.52B |
| Total Debt | 15B | 264B | 29.2B |
BLK | BN | STT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 65 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 43 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 89 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 70 | 3 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 97 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STT's Valuation (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (72) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (86) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (43) in the Investment Managers industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (59) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s and somewhat faster than BLK’s over the last 12 months.
STT's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (66) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (89) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
STT's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BLK (51) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (70) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew somewhat faster than BLK’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
STT's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BLK (56) in the Investment Managers industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for BN (97) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT's stock grew similarly to BLK’s and significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.
| BLK | BN | STT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 58% | 13 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 58% | 5 days ago 66% | 11 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 65% |
Advertisement
BLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLK has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BLK jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.
BN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
STT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.