CHD
Price
$97.64
Change
+$1.45 (+1.51%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
23.14B
5 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CLX
Price
$95.55
Change
+$1.75 (+1.87%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
11.55B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PG
Price
$147.41
Change
+$0.44 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
343.26B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHD or CLX or PG

CHD vs CLX vs PG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Church & Dwight (CHD) vs. Clorox (CLX) vs. Procter & Gamble (PG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Procter & Gamble offers the largest scale and strongest dividend track record, with 70 consecutive years of payout increases and a market capitalization exceeding $348 billion, but faces near-term cost headwinds from tariffs and commodities.
  • Church & Dwight has delivered the strongest year-to-date price performance among the three, gaining approximately 17.7% in 2026, supported by consistent earnings beats and a diversified consumer portfolio anchored by the Arm & Hammer brand.
  • Clorox remains the most deeply discounted of the group on a P/E basis, trading near 15x earnings with a dividend yield above 5%, but continues to work through ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system disruptions, lowered guidance, and slower-than-expected brand recoveries.
  • All three stocks belong to the Consumer Staples sector and serve as defensive holdings, yet their recent trajectories have diverged significantly, with CHD showing relative momentum and CLX underperforming both peers and the broader market over the past year.
  • Analyst consensus skews most favorably toward PG (Moderate Buy), followed by CHD (Hold/Buy), while CLX carries the most cautious Street sentiment (Reduce/Hold).

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the Consumer Staples sector often gravitate toward household names with durable demand, recognizable brand portfolios, and consistent cash-flow generation. CHD, CLX, and PG — Church & Dwight, Clorox, and Procter & Gamble — represent three distinct tiers within this space, ranging from a mid-cap specialty player to a global industry giant. This stock comparison examines how these three consumer packaged goods companies stack up in the current market environment, offering perspective for both income-oriented investors and those evaluating relative performance, valuation sensitivity, and operational momentum across the household and personal care landscape.

CHD Overview and Recent Performance

CHD, known for its flagship Arm & Hammer brand alongside OxiClean, Trojan, TheraBreath, Batiste, and Vitafusion, generates roughly 80% of its sales within the United States. With a market capitalization near $23.5 billion, the company occupies a mid-tier position in consumer staples — large enough to command meaningful shelf space yet more concentrated in its category exposure than its larger peers.

In recent weeks, CHD has traded around the $98–$99 range, near the midpoint of its 52-week span of $81.33 to $106.04. The stock's year-to-date gain of approximately 17.7% reflects steady upward momentum, aided by a first-quarter earnings report in which the company posted EPS (earnings per share) of $0.95, exceeding the consensus estimate of $0.93, alongside revenue of $1.47 billion that narrowly beat expectations. The company reaffirmed full-year 2026 EPS guidance of $3.71 to $3.81, providing a measure of visibility that markets have responded to positively. Institutional activity has been notably active, with several large asset managers increasing positions during recent quarters, while insider selling — totaling approximately $4.7 million over a recent 90-day period — has introduced a modest counterweight to bullish sentiment. Wells Fargo maintained an Overweight rating and raised its price target to $110 in recent weeks, contributing to an analyst consensus that leans constructive, with an average target near $103.47. With a beta of 0.47, CHD exhibits low volatility relative to the broader market.

CLX Overview and Recent Performance

CLX commands one of the most recognized brand portfolios in household products, including Clorox bleach and disinfecting wipes, Pine-Sol, Glad trash bags, Burt's Bees, Kingsford charcoal, Fresh Step cat litter, Hidden Valley dressings, and Brita water filtration. The Oakland, California-based company holds a market capitalization of roughly $11.5 to $11.8 billion and has historically been regarded as a defensive staple with reliable cash flows.

However, recent market activity has painted a more challenging picture. CLX shares have declined approximately 22% to 27% over the trailing 52-week period, enduring a significant drawdown from a 52-week high of $132.03 to recent trading levels near $97. The operational narrative has been shaped by a 2023 cyberattack that disrupted production and distribution, followed by a complex ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) system implementation that created inventory distortions and slowed volume recovery. In its most recent quarterly report, CLX delivered EPS of $1.64 — beating the $1.55 estimate — while revenue of $1.67 billion came in essentially flat year over year. Management subsequently lowered its fiscal 2026 outlook, citing softer consumer demand and persistent cost pressures, and announced a CEO transition process. On the strategic front, the company's acquisition of GOJO Industries — maker of the Purell brand — for $2.25 billion represents a significant bet on expanding its Health and Wellness segment. Analyst sentiment remains cautious, with a consensus rating of Reduce and an average price target near $103. The stock's current forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) of approximately 15x and dividend yield above 5% have nonetheless attracted value-oriented buyers.

PG Overview and Recent Performance

PG is the undisputed heavyweight in global consumer packaged goods. Headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, Procter & Gamble's portfolio spans Beauty, Grooming, Health Care, Fabric & Home Care, and Baby, Feminine & Family Care segments, anchored by iconic brands such as Tide, Pampers, Gillette, Crest, and Dawn. With a market capitalization exceeding $348 billion, PG is one of the largest publicly traded companies in the world and a benchmark holding in the Consumer Staples sector.

In recent weeks, PG shares have traded near the $149–$151 range, between a 52-week low of $137.62 and a high of $167.25. The company reported fiscal third-quarter 2026 results that featured EPS of $1.59, beating the $1.56 consensus estimate, while revenue of $21.23 billion rose 7.4% year over year — though it came in slightly below analyst expectations. Organic sales, which strip out currency effects and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) impacts, grew 3%. Management maintained full-year EPS guidance of $6.83 to $7.09, even while navigating approximately $400 million in after-tax tariff-related costs and $150 million in commodity headwinds. PG's dividend pedigree is unmatched: the company recently announced its 70th consecutive annual dividend increase, having paid a dividend every year since 1890. The current yield near 2.9% and a payout ratio of roughly 63.6% underscore the safety of that income stream. With a beta of 0.39 and a P/E ratio of roughly 22x, PG offers defensive stability at a moderate valuation premium. Wall Street maintains a consensus Moderate Buy rating, with an average price target of $161.42, and JPMorgan recently reiterated its Overweight stance with a $162 target.

Trending AI Robots

For investors who prefer a data-driven approach to navigating stock selection across names like CHD, CLX, and PG, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway into algorithmic trading. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade thousands of different tickers using distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. However, only a select subset — those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions — earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots employ varied trading styles, from short-term momentum-based approaches to longer-duration trend-following models, and their performance statistics are transparently displayed for evaluation. Whether an investor is seeking a bot that specializes in Consumer Staples names or one that scans for volatility-adjusted entry points across sectors, the Trending AI Robots page provides a focused starting point for exploring systematic, emotion-free trading strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When evaluating CHD, CLX, and PG side by side, several contrasts emerge. PG is the clear leader in scale, geographic diversification, and dividend reliability — its $10 billion in annual dividend payments and 70-year growth streak are virtually unmatched in corporate America. Yet PG's premium P/E of approximately 22x and limited organic sales growth of around 3% mean the stock is primarily an income-and-stability proposition rather than a growth vehicle.

CHD occupies a middle ground. Its 32x P/E multiple is the highest of the three, reflecting investor confidence in the company's consistent execution, brand momentum, and acquisition strategy — recent additions such as TheraBreath, Hero, and Touchland have expanded its addressable market. The stock's beta of 0.47 and approximately 1.2% dividend yield make it a lower-volatility holding, though income-focused investors will find the yield modest relative to peers.

CLX presents the most pronounced value case — and the most visible operational risk. A 15x P/E and a dividend yield exceeding 5% are rare in the Consumer Staples sector and suggest the market has priced in considerable uncertainty. The ERP transition, CEO search, and lowered guidance add layers of execution risk. On the other hand, the GOJO acquisition could become a meaningful long-term catalyst if the integration progresses smoothly. In terms of recent momentum, CHD has clearly outperformed, PG has held relatively steady, and CLX has struggled to regain footing.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors — including trend consistency, earnings trajectory, institutional accumulation patterns, and relative price momentum — Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely favor CHD among the three in the current environment. The stock's steady climb through 2026, supported by consecutive earnings beats, reaffirmed guidance, and constructive analyst revisions, reflects a positive trend structure that algorithmic models tend to identify and follow. PG would likely register as the most statistically stable candidate, with its ultra-low beta and unmatched dividend history appealing to AI strategies optimized for risk-adjusted returns and income consistency. CLX, while offering a compelling valuation signal, would likely require a catalyst-driven or mean-reversion-oriented AI strategy given the elevated uncertainty surrounding its operational recovery. As always, the suitability of any individual stock depends on the specific objectives, time horizon, and risk parameters of the strategy being deployed.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2026
Stock price -- (CHD: $97.64CLX: $95.55PG: $147.41)
Brand notoriety: CHD and CLX are not notable and PG is notable
The three companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHD: 64%, CLX: 58%, PG: 78%
Market capitalization -- CHD: $23.14B, CLX: $11.55B, PG: $343.26B
$CHD is valued at $23.14B, while CLX has a market capitalization of $11.55B, and PG's market capitalization is $343.26B. The market cap for tickers in this @Household/Personal Care ranges from $343.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Household/Personal Care industry is $22.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and PG’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CHD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PG is a better buy in the long-term than CLX, which in turn is a better option than CHD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CHD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PG’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CHD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CLX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CHD is a better buy in the short-term than CLX, which in turn is a better option than PG.

Price Growth

CHD (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.44% price change this week, while CLX (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -0.80% , and PG (@Household/Personal Care) price fluctuated -0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

CHD is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

CLX is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

PG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-0.65% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PG($343B) has a higher market cap than CHD($23.1B) and CLX($11.6B). CHD has higher P/E ratio than PG and CLX: CHD (32.12) vs PG (21.55) and CLX (15.54). CHD YTD gains are higher at: 17.186 vs. PG (5.150) and CLX (-2.979). PG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 24.9B vs. CLX (1.31B) and CHD (1.29B). CLX has more cash in the bank: 1.19B vs. CHD (503M) and PG (). CHD has less debt than CLX and PG: CHD (2.21B) vs CLX (4.49B) and PG (37B). PG has higher revenues than CLX and CHD: PG (86.7B) vs CLX (6.76B) and CHD (6.21B).
CHDCLXPG
Capitalization23.1B11.6B343B
EBITDA1.29B1.31B24.9B
Gain YTD17.186-2.9795.150
P/E Ratio32.1215.5421.55
Revenue6.21B6.76B86.7B
Total Cash503M1.19BN/A
Total Debt2.21B4.49B37B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CHD vs CLX vs PG: Fundamental Ratings
CHD
CLX
PG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
665866
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
24
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6710056
SMR RATING
1..100
52232
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
516057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
758466
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLX's Valuation (24) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (28) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (65). This means that CLX's stock grew similarly to PG’s and somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.

PG's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (67) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CLX (100). This means that PG's stock grew similarly to CHD’s and somewhat faster than CLX’s over the last 12 months.

CLX's SMR Rating (2) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (32) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CHD (52). This means that CLX's stock grew similarly to PG’s and somewhat faster than CHD’s over the last 12 months.

CHD's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as PG (57) and is in the same range as CLX (60). This means that CHD's stock grew similarly to PG’s and similarly to CLX’s over the last 12 months.

PG's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as CHD (75) and is in the same range as CLX (84). This means that PG's stock grew similarly to CHD’s and similarly to CLX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHDCLXPG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CLX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCOM43.640.62
+1.44%
Trip.com Group Limited
CARE34.010.11
+0.32%
Carter Bankshares
DOCS20.42-0.03
-0.15%
Doximity
HURA2.11-0.04
-1.86%
TuHURA Biosciences Inc
YMAT1.82-0.13
-6.67%
J-Star Holding Co Ltd

CLX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLX has been loosely correlated with PG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLX jumps, then PG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLX
1D Price
Change %
CLX100%
+1.87%
PG - CLX
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
CHD - CLX
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.51%
CL - CLX
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
UL - CLX
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
IPAR - CLX
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
More

PG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PG has been closely correlated with CL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PG jumps, then CL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PG
1D Price
Change %
PG100%
+1.05%
CL - PG
76%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
UL - PG
69%
Closely correlated
+1.21%
CHD - PG
67%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
CLX - PG
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
KMB - PG
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
More