EVR
Price
$339.63
Change
+$4.83 (+1.44%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.14B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GS
Price
$1061.23
Change
-$13.49 (-1.26%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
313.07B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NDAQ
Price
$92.09
Change
+$1.67 (+1.85%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
51.48B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EVR or GS or NDAQ

EVR vs GS vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Evercore Inc. (EVR) vs. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) vs. Nasdaq Inc. (NDAQ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • EVR has capitalized on a surging M&A (Mergers and Acquisitions) cycle, posting record advisory revenues and expanding its global footprint through strategic hires and the acquisition of Robey Warshaw.
  • GS delivered $58.28 billion in record annual revenue for 2025, fueled by its dominant #1 global M&A ranking and a strategic pivot toward fee-based Asset & Wealth Management.
  • NDAQ surpassed $5 billion in annual net revenue for the first time, driven by diversified growth across financial technology, index services, and market infrastructure — a fundamentally different business model from the two investment banks.
  • All three companies benefit from robust capital markets activity, but they differ sharply in revenue composition, cyclical sensitivity, valuation profiles, and exposure to regulatory and technology trends.
  • EVR offers concentrated advisory upside, GS provides diversified institutional exposure, and NDAQ delivers recurring, platform-based revenue with a technology tilt.

Introduction

Investors evaluating financial-sector equities face a landscape that ranges from pure-play advisory boutiques to diversified global banks and exchange-technology platforms. EVR (Evercore Inc.), GS (Goldman Sachs Group Inc.), and NDAQ (Nasdaq Inc.) represent three distinct approaches to capturing value in today's financial markets. This stock comparison examines how each company has performed in recent market activity, what distinguishes their business models, and how their relative positioning may appeal to different types of traders and long-term investors. With deal-making momentum accelerating and market infrastructure evolving, a clear understanding of these three names has become especially timely.

EVR Overview and Recent Performance

Evercore Inc. (EVR) is a premier independent investment banking advisory firm, headquartered in New York and operating across more than 50 countries with approximately 2,570 employees. Unlike full-service banks, Evercore focuses almost exclusively on strategic advisory services — M&A (Mergers and Acquisitions), restructuring, and capital markets advisory — supplemented by a growing equities research franchise and a smaller investment management division.

In recent months, Evercore has posted standout financial results. The company reported record full-year 2025 net revenues of approximately $3.9 billion, reflecting a 29% increase over the prior year. Fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share (EPS) reached $5.13, significantly surpassing consensus estimates. The firm ranked third globally in advisory fees, behind only GS and JPM, and advised on several marquee transactions including the Warner Bros. Discovery separation and sale to Netflix, as well as Devon Energy's $58 billion merger with Coterra Energy. Evercore has also been aggressive in talent acquisition, bringing on 19 Senior Managing Directors in 2025 and completing the acquisition of UK-based Robey Warshaw. The stock has rallied substantially over the past several months, though its valuation multiple — a trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio around 18x — reflects investor confidence in the durability of the advisory upcycle. On the capital return front, Evercore returned over $812 million to shareholders in 2025 through dividends and buybacks, supported by a strong balance sheet with approximately $3 billion in cash and equivalents.

GS Overview and Recent Performance

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) needs little introduction as one of the world's most prominent full-service financial institutions. With a market capitalization approaching $300 billion, Goldman operates across two core segments: Global Banking & Markets (which includes investment banking, FICC, and equities trading) and Asset & Wealth Management (AWM). The firm has spent the past several years executing a deliberate strategic pivot away from consumer lending and toward capital-light, fee-based revenue streams.

Goldman's recent performance underscores the payoff from that strategy. Full-year 2025 net revenues reached a record $58.28 billion, up 9% year-over-year, while diluted EPS climbed 27% to $51.32. The firm maintained its #1 global M&A ranking for the 25th consecutive year, advising on $1.6 trillion in announced deal volume. Notably, the AWM segment hit record Assets Under Supervision (AUS) of $3.6 trillion, with management fees reaching quarterly records. The fourth quarter of 2025 brought an EPS of $14.01, comfortably beating Wall Street expectations, even as revenue was impacted by the accounting treatment of the Apple Card portfolio sale to JPM. Goldman's annualized return on average common shareholders' equity (ROE) stood at 15.0% for 2025, and the firm raised its quarterly dividend by 33% to $4.00 per share. The company's investment banking backlog entered 2026 at a four-year high, and CEO David Solomon has expressed confidence that momentum will accelerate through the year. Goldman's total shareholder return exceeded 340% since its 2020 Investor Day, making it a standout among large-cap financial peers.

NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance

Nasdaq Inc. (NDAQ) operates a fundamentally different business from the two investment banks. As a global exchange operator and financial technology provider, Nasdaq generates revenue from listing fees, market data, index licensing, trading and clearing services, and a rapidly expanding suite of financial technology solutions — including anti-financial crime software, regulatory technology, and capital markets infrastructure technology. The 2023 acquisition of Adenza (AxiomSL and Calypso) meaningfully broadened its fintech capabilities.

Nasdaq delivered what Chair and CEO Adena Friedman described as an "excellent year of execution" in 2025. Annual net revenues surpassed $5 billion for the first time, reaching $5.2 billion — a 13% increase. Solutions revenue crossed $4 billion, while Annualized Recurring Revenue (ARR) grew 10% to $3.1 billion. Non-GAAP diluted EPS rose 24% to $3.48. The Index franchise was a standout, with record net inflows of $99 billion and end-of-period ETP (Exchange-Traded Product) assets under management (AUM) of $882 billion. Nasdaq maintained its position as the #1 U.S. exchange by IPO proceeds raised for the seventh consecutive year and executed a record $1.2 trillion in listing transfers, headlined by Walmart's historic switch. The Financial Technology division delivered 11% revenue growth, with Financial Crime Management Technology surging 22%. Every G-SIB (Global Systemically Important Bank) is now a Nasdaq client. Looking ahead, Nasdaq has filed with the SEC to facilitate trading of tokenized securities and plans to launch 23/5 trading in the second half of 2026. With gross leverage reduced to 2.9x, the balance sheet is in solid shape, and the company returned over $1.2 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks in 2025.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking an automated, data-driven approach to navigating the markets, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to adapt to evolving market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots, each configured with distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles. These bots trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market dynamics earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. Visitors can explore bots with varying performance metrics and risk parameters — from short-term swing trading models to longer-duration trend-following systems — all backed by real-time signal generation and historical performance data. Whether you are interested in stocks like EVR, GS, or NDAQ, exploring which AI-driven strategies are currently trending may offer a valuable complement to traditional fundamental analysis.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While all three companies operate within the broad financial sector, their business models, revenue drivers, and risk profiles are markedly different — and these contrasts are central to any meaningful stock comparison.

Business Model: EVR is a pure-play advisory firm whose revenue is overwhelmingly tied to M&A transaction fees. GS is a diversified investment bank with significant trading, asset management, and financing operations alongside its advisory business. NDAQ is an exchange and technology platform company whose revenue is predominantly recurring, subscription-based, and linked to market infrastructure rather than deal flow.

Growth Drivers: EVR benefits directly from the global M&A upcycle and its ability to attract senior advisory talent. GS benefits from the same M&A cycle but also from trading volumes, asset management fee growth, and financing revenues. NDAQ benefits from secular trends in financial technology adoption, index investing growth, and capital markets modernization — trends less correlated with any single M&A cycle.

Cyclicality and Risk: EVR carries the highest cyclical sensitivity; its revenues can swing sharply with deal-making sentiment. GS is moderately cyclical, with trading and AWM revenues providing partial offsets to M&A variability. NDAQ is the least cyclical of the three, given that over three-quarters of its revenue now comes from recurring Solutions contracts, though trading volumes still influence its Market Services segment.

Valuation and Sentiment: EVR trades at a P/E ratio near 18x trailing earnings, reflecting confidence in the advisory cycle but also concentration risk. GS, with a far larger market cap and a P/E ratio in the mid-to-high teens depending on the measurement window, offers diversified exposure but faces mixed analyst price targets. NDAQ commands a higher earnings multiple given its recurring revenue profile and technology-adjacent narrative, though its growth rate is more moderate than the advisory-driven names during M&A booms.

Capital Returns: All three companies have demonstrated strong commitment to shareholder returns. EVR favors buybacks, GS has significantly raised its dividend and continues aggressive repurchases, and NDAQ employs a balanced mix of dividends, buybacks, and debt reduction.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability of revenue streams, and exposure to structural growth catalysts, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely express a preference for NDAQ among the three in the current environment. The reasoning is threefold: first, NDAQ's high proportion of recurring revenue — anchored by $3.1 billion in ARR — provides a stability cushion that the more cyclical advisory revenues of EVR and GS cannot fully match. Second, NDAQ is positioned to benefit from multiple secular tailwinds — AI integration in financial crime detection, index investing growth, market modernization, and tokenization — that are less dependent on the pace of M&A activity. Third, while GS undoubtedly offers the most diversified institutional exposure and EVR provides the most concentrated upside to the current deal-making renaissance, the AI-driven assessment tends to prioritize consistency of trend and breadth of catalyst support — areas where NDAQ's platform-based model currently holds an edge. That said, the verdict is probabilistic in nature and sensitive to shifting market conditions; a sustained acceleration in M&A could easily shift the relative advantage toward the advisory-focused names.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (EVR: $339.63GS: $1061.23NDAQ: $92.09)
Brand notoriety: EVR and NDAQ are not notable and GS is notable
EVR and GS are part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry, and NDAQ is in the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EVR: 96%, GS: 62%, NDAQ: 69%
Market capitalization -- EVR: $13.14B, GS: $313.07B, NDAQ: $51.48B
$EVR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $13.14B. $GS’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $ $313.07B. $NDAQ [@Financial Publishing/Services] has a market capitalization of $ $51.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $ $928.5B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $ $126.21B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $ $13.55B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $ $38.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EVR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and NDAQ’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GS is a better buy in the long-term than EVR and NDAQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EVR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and NDAQ’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EVR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than GS, which in turn is a better option than EVR.

Price Growth

EVR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while GS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.37% , and NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price fluctuated +0.49% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.58%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.93%.

Reported Earning Dates

EVR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

GS is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.63% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (-3.25% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GS($313B) has a higher market cap than NDAQ($51.5B) and EVR($13.1B). NDAQ has higher P/E ratio than EVR and GS: NDAQ (26.85) vs EVR (19.11) and GS (16.39). GS YTD gains are higher at: 21.902 vs. EVR (0.332) and NDAQ (-4.548). EVR has less debt than NDAQ and GS: EVR (1.1B) vs NDAQ (9.45B) and GS (435B). GS has higher revenues than NDAQ and EVR: GS (60.4B) vs NDAQ (8.3B) and EVR (4.55B).
EVRGSNDAQ
Capitalization13.1B313B51.5B
EBITDAN/AN/A3.32B
Gain YTD0.33221.902-4.548
P/E Ratio19.1116.3926.85
Revenue4.55B60.4B8.3B
Total CashN/AN/AN/A
Total Debt1.1B435B9.45B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EVR vs GS vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
EVR
GS
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
587650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36632
SMR RATING
1..100
22753
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
574248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
834476
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (73) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as GS (82) and is in the same range as EVR (87). This means that NDAQ's stock grew similarly to GS’s and similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (32) and is in the same range as EVR (36). This means that GS's stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s and similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.

GS's SMR Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EVR (22) and is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (53). This means that GS's stock grew similarly to EVR’s and somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

GS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (48) and is in the same range as EVR (57). This means that GS's stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s and similarly to EVR’s over the last 12 months.

GS's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (76) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EVR (83). This means that GS's stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s and somewhat faster than EVR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EVRGSNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EVR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NDAQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GWRS7.360.21
+2.94%
Global Water Resources
CHH110.522.52
+2.33%
Choice Hotels Intnl
RSG216.91-0.51
-0.23%
Republic Services
NXPL5.80-0.11
-1.78%
NextPlat Corp.
QDEL16.05-0.53
-3.20%
QuidelOrtho Corp

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
+1.85%
JEF - NDAQ
71%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
MS - NDAQ
71%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
GS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
RJF - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
+1.90%
SPGI - NDAQ
68%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
More