Advertisement
FRSH or HUBS or WDAY
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) vs. HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) vs. Workday, Inc. (WDAY) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) focuses on AI-powered customer and employee experience platforms, with recent market activity reflecting steady but modest valuation levels amid broader software sector volatility.
- HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) delivers integrated marketing, sales, and service software, showing resilient relative performance in recent weeks driven by AI enhancements and regional expansion efforts.
- Workday, Inc. (WDAY) provides enterprise cloud applications for human capital and financial management, with performance influenced by ongoing AI integrations and post-earnings sentiment shifts.
- All three companies operate in the software-as-a-service (SaaS) space, exposing them to similar macroeconomic factors, yet they differ in target customer segments and growth maturity.
- Market sentiment across the group remains cautious, with emphasis on AI adoption as a key differentiator in recent trading periods.
- Relative positioning highlights trade-offs between smaller-cap agility in Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) and established scale in HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) and Workday, Inc. (WDAY).
Introduction
This comparison examines Freshworks Inc. (FRSH), HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS), and Workday, Inc. (WDAY), three publicly traded companies in the enterprise software sector. Each delivers cloud-based solutions that incorporate artificial intelligence to enhance business operations, yet they target distinct customer bases and use cases. Professional traders and institutional investors evaluating software exposure may find this analysis useful for assessing relative momentum, valuation dynamics, and sector positioning in the current environment. The focus remains on observable performance trends and fundamental contrasts without forward projections.
FRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) develops software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms centered on customer experience and employee experience management. Its offerings include AI-enhanced tools for support, sales, marketing, and IT service delivery. In recent weeks, the stock has exhibited measured price behavior within a narrow range, consistent with the broader software industry’s response to macroeconomic signals. Sentiment has been shaped by steady adoption of its AI features among mid-market clients, supporting stable but contained trading activity.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) provides an integrated platform for marketing, sales, and customer service automation. The company emphasizes inbound strategies supported by artificial intelligence capabilities. Recent market activity has featured periods of upward movement, influenced by announcements around AI-led initiatives and expansion in key international regions. Performance reflects ongoing demand for its all-in-one solution among growing businesses, contributing to relative resilience amid sector fluctuations.
WDAY Overview and Recent Performance
Workday, Inc. (WDAY) supplies enterprise cloud applications focused on human capital management and financial operations. Its platform serves large organizations with tools for workforce planning and analytics, increasingly augmented by AI. In recent weeks, the stock has responded to earnings updates and new AI accelerator programs, resulting in mixed trading patterns. Broader sentiment incorporates analyst commentary on revenue trends and competitive positioning within the human resources technology space.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots drawn from a library of hundreds that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical win rates and profitability ranges varying by strategy. This variety enables users to explore data-driven approaches tailored to individual objectives. Review the full collection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and backtested results.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH), HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS), and Workday, Inc. (WDAY) share exposure to the software-as-a-service (SaaS) sector yet pursue differentiated business models. Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) emphasizes accessible AI tools for mid-sized teams in customer and employee service, offering agility suited to smaller enterprise footprints. HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) integrates multiple functions into a single inbound platform, appealing to scaling organizations seeking unified marketing and sales workflows. Workday, Inc. (WDAY) targets complex enterprise needs with deep human capital and financial applications, providing scale advantages but higher valuation sensitivity.
Recent momentum has varied, with HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) displaying more pronounced short-term gains tied to regional AI rollouts, while Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) maintained steadier but lower-volatility movement. Workday, Inc. (WDAY) encountered greater swings linked to earnings and AI program launches. Risk factors include competition in AI feature development for all three, with Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) facing execution challenges as a smaller entity and the larger peers navigating slower growth cycles in mature markets. Valuation metrics reflect these differences, with market sentiment favoring companies demonstrating clear AI differentiation.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability of recent price action, and positioning around AI catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable relative performance to HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). This assessment draws from its demonstrated resilience in recent market activity and balanced growth profile. Outcomes remain probabilistic and subject to evolving sector dynamics.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and WDAY’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WDAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and WDAY’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- WDAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.10% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.13% , and WDAY (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated -12.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
WDAY is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.58% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FRSH | HUBS | WDAY | |
| Capitalization | 2.54B | 8.87B | 28.4B |
| EBITDA | 42.9M | 267M | 1.73B |
| Gain YTD | -27.102 | -56.940 | -47.369 |
| P/E Ratio | 14.54 | 90.95 | 35.21 |
| Revenue | 871M | 3.3B | 9.85B |
| Total Cash | 779M | 1.69B | 4.35B |
| Total Debt | 38.8M | 247M | 3.81B |
FRSH | HUBS | WDAY | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 54 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 86 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 89 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 31 | 97 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FRSH's Valuation (56) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WDAY (67) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (78) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to WDAY’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (92) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WDAY (100) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to WDAY’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WDAY (69) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to WDAY’s and somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as WDAY (82) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (89) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew similarly to WDAY’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (97) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for WDAY (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FRSH's stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s and significantly faster than WDAY’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | HUBS | WDAY | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | 23 days ago 74% | 23 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with ASAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then ASAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| ASAN - FRSH | 73% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| CRM - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 69% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| SPT - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -1.83% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 66% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
More | ||||
WDAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WDAY has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WDAY jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WDAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WDAY | 100% | -3.33% | ||
| CRM - WDAY | 75% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| TEAM - WDAY | 72% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| INTU - WDAY | 71% Closely correlated | -3.46% | ||
| HUBS - WDAY | 70% Closely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| ASAN - WDAY | 70% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
More | ||||