General Dynamics (GD), Lockheed Martin (LMT), and RTX Corporation (RTX) represent leading players in the aerospace and defense sector, benefiting from elevated global military spending and geopolitical uncertainties. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business drivers, and market positioning to aid traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing long-term stability. With defense budgets expanding and contracts surging, these stocks offer insights into sector trends like missile systems, combat vehicles, and aircraft engines, relevant for portfolios focused on industrials and national security exposure.
General Dynamics (GD) is a global aerospace and defense contractor specializing in business jets via Gulfstream, nuclear submarines, combat vehicles, and mission systems. Organized into Aerospace, Marine Systems, Combat Systems, and Technologies segments, it serves U.S. military and international allies. Trading around $357 with a $96B market cap, GD boasts a P/E of 23.1 and 1.68% dividend yield. In recent weeks, shares have advanced amid market declines, up 0.2% post-earnings with Q4 EPS beating estimates at $4.17. Sentiment has strengthened on prospective Navy submarine contracts and AI-integrated army work, contributing to 44.6% 1-year returns despite tariff concerns. Broader backlog growth and operational resilience have driven relative outperformance versus the Dow.
Lockheed Martin (LMT) stands as a premier security and aerospace firm, producing F-35 fighters, missiles, rotary-wing aircraft, and C4ISR systems. Its portfolio emphasizes advanced technology integration for U.S. and allied forces. At about $658 and $152B market cap, LMT features a P/E of 30.6 and 2.05% yield. Recent market activity shows robust gains, with shares surging on U.S. strikes and Iran tensions, alongside premarket lifts from defense demand. YTD up 36% and 52% over 1-year, performance reflects a solid backlog, new contracts, and sector tailwinds like hypersonics. Steady valuation and operational strength have fueled investor interest amid volatility.
RTX Corporation (RTX), formerly Raytheon Technologies, delivers integrated aerospace and defense solutions through Collins Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney engines, and Raytheon missiles. It focuses on avionics, propulsion, and counter-threat systems for commercial and military use. Priced near $203 with a $272B market cap, RTX trades at a P/E of 40.9 and 1.34% yield. In recent weeks, shares have rallied on Middle East escalations and contract wins, posting 10.9% YTD and 58% 1-year gains. Momentum stems from defense pipeline expansions and diversified revenue, though valuation scrutiny persists post-earnings. Geopolitical catalysts continue to enhance sentiment in this high-capex sector.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds, which scan and trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like swing, scalping, and hedging. Only those excelling in current volatility—such as aerospace & defense bots yielding up to +120% annualized returns with 75% win rates and profit factors over 3.9—earn a spot, often outperforming the S&P 500 by wide margins. Stats highlight win rates of 54-95%, returns from +15% to +247%, and low drawdowns in sectors like semiconductors and industrials. These bots employ advanced Financial Learning Models for real-time signals. Traders can explore and subscribe to copy top performers tailored to market conditions.
GD, LMT, and RTX share defense sector exposure but diverge in models: GD emphasizes ground/marine systems, LMT air dominance via F-35, and RTX balances missiles/engines with commercial aviation. Growth drivers include U.S. budget hikes for LMT/RTX, while GD leverages submarine windfalls. Recent momentum peaks for RTX (58% 1-yr) amid tensions, but GD offers value at lowest P/E. Risks encompass program delays for all, with RTX sensitive to commercial cycles. Sentiment tilts bullish on geopolitics, favoring LMT's backlog stability over peers' trade-offs.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward LMT based on superior trend consistency, YTD momentum exceeding 36%, and unmatched backlog positioning amid sustained defense catalysts. Its balanced valuation and dividend edge provide stability versus RTX's premium multiple, while outperforming GD on relative strength. Probabilistic factors suggest higher probability of continued outperformance in volatile conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and RTX’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LMT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and RTX’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GD (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while LMT (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -0.61% , and RTX (@Aerospace & Defense) price fluctuated +0.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -7.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.56%.
GD is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
LMT is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
RTX is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| GD | LMT | RTX | |
| Capitalization | 93.7B | 121B | 244B |
| EBITDA | 6.59B | 8.47B | 15.4B |
| Gain YTD | 3.805 | 9.572 | -0.574 |
| P/E Ratio | 21.80 | 25.36 | 33.96 |
| Revenue | 53.8B | 75.1B | 90.4B |
| Total Cash | 3.65B | 1.89B | 6.82B |
| Total Debt | 9.83B | 20.7B | 38.9B |
GD | LMT | RTX | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 37 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 48 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 17 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 54 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 32 | 69 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GD's Valuation (43) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as RTX (50) in the null industry, and is in the same range as LMT (61) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that GD's stock grew similarly to RTX’s and similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
RTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as GD (16) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for LMT (48) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that RTX's stock grew similarly to GD’s and somewhat faster than LMT’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's SMR Rating (17) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as GD (49) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for RTX (67) in the null industry. This means that LMT's stock grew similarly to GD’s and somewhat faster than RTX’s over the last 12 months.
GD's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as RTX (50) in the null industry, and is in the same range as LMT (54) in the Aerospace And Defense industry. This means that GD's stock grew similarly to RTX’s and similarly to LMT’s over the last 12 months.
LMT's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as GD (38) in the Aerospace And Defense industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for RTX (69) in the null industry. This means that LMT's stock grew similarly to GD’s and somewhat faster than RTX’s over the last 12 months.
| GD | LMT | RTX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 29% | 4 days ago 49% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 41% | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 36% | 6 days ago 50% | 6 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 44% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 37% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GD has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GD jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LMT has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LMT jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RTX has been loosely correlated with LHX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RTX jumps, then LHX could also see price increases.