GLXY
Price
$21.63
Change
-$0.68 (-3.05%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.14B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IBKR
Price
$90.53
Change
-$1.68 (-1.82%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
40.33B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NDAQ
Price
$91.64
Change
-$2.61 (-2.77%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
51.83B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLXY or IBKR or NDAQ

GLXY vs IBKR vs NDAQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2026
Stock price -- (GLXY: $21.63IBKR: $90.53NDAQ: $91.64)
Brand notoriety: GLXY, IBKR and NDAQ are all not notable
GLXY and IBKR are part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry, and NDAQ is in the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLXY: 57%, IBKR: 53%, NDAQ: 45%
Market capitalization -- GLXY: $4.14B, IBKR: $40.33B, NDAQ: $51.83B
$GLXY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $4.14B. $IBKR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $ $40.33B. $NDAQ [@Financial Publishing/Services] has a market capitalization of $ $51.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $ $928.5B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $ $133.45B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $ $13.78B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $ $39.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLXY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBKR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and NDAQ’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLXY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IBKR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBKR is a better buy in the long-term than NDAQ, which in turn is a better option than GLXY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLXY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBKR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and NDAQ’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLXY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IBKR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the short-term than GLXY, which in turn is a better option than IBKR.

Price Growth

GLXY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -13.06% price change this week, while IBKR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -3.78% , and NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price fluctuated +4.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.23%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

IBKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.50% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Financial Publishing/Services (+2.16% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($51.8B) has a higher market cap than IBKR($40.3B) and GLXY($4.14B). GLXY has higher P/E ratio than IBKR and NDAQ: GLXY (47.25) vs IBKR (38.85) and NDAQ (27.60). IBKR YTD gains are higher at: 41.064 vs. GLXY (-3.265) and NDAQ (-5.014). IBKR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.42B vs. NDAQ (3.32B) and GLXY (-113.65M). IBKR has more cash in the bank: 5.09B vs. GLXY (2.46B) and NDAQ (). IBKR has less debt than GLXY and NDAQ: IBKR (12M) vs GLXY (4.64B) and NDAQ (9.45B). GLXY has higher revenues than IBKR and NDAQ: GLXY (57.5B) vs IBKR (10.6B) and NDAQ (8.3B).
GLXYIBKRNDAQ
Capitalization4.14B40.3B51.8B
EBITDA-113.65M9.42B3.32B
Gain YTD-3.26541.064-5.014
P/E Ratio47.2538.8527.60
Revenue57.5B10.6B8.3B
Total Cash2.46B5.09BN/A
Total Debt4.64B12M9.45B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IBKR vs NDAQ: Fundamental Ratings
IBKR
NDAQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
732
SMR RATING
1..100
4553
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3283
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NDAQ's Valuation (76) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as IBKR (94). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to IBKR’s over the last 12 months.

IBKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (32). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

IBKR's SMR Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (53). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

IBKR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (50). This means that IBKR’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

IBKR's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (83). This means that IBKR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLXYIBKRNDAQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLXY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IBKR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NDAQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEEI22.76N/A
N/A
Westwood Salient Enhanced Engy Inc ETF
MAXJ29.17-0.03
-0.10%
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
KLIP24.20-0.06
-0.25%
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strat ETF
VKQ9.92-0.04
-0.40%
Invesco Municipal Trust
IJS136.94-1.17
-0.85%
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF

GLXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLXY has been closely correlated with BTBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLXY jumps, then BTBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLXY
1D Price
Change %
GLXY100%
-3.05%
BTBT - GLXY
67%
Closely correlated
-4.76%
MARA - GLXY
67%
Closely correlated
-6.39%
CLSK - GLXY
66%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
RIOT - GLXY
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.98%
BMNR - GLXY
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
More

IBKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBKR has been closely correlated with HOOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBKR jumps, then HOOD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBKR
1D Price
Change %
IBKR100%
-1.82%
HOOD - IBKR
66%
Closely correlated
-5.72%
RJF - IBKR
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
MS - IBKR
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
NDAQ - IBKR
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.77%
SF - IBKR
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
More

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
-2.77%
JEF - NDAQ
71%
Closely correlated
-1.67%
MS - NDAQ
71%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
GS - NDAQ
70%
Closely correlated
-2.76%
RJF - NDAQ
69%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
SPGI - NDAQ
68%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
More