H
Price
$190.63
Change
-$3.45 (-1.78%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
17.95B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HLT
Price
$338.22
Change
-$4.35 (-1.27%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
77B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MAR
Price
$386.23
Change
-$7.38 (-1.87%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
101.84B
54 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

H or HLT or MAR

Header iconH vs HLT vs MAR Comparison
Open Charts H vs HLT vs MARBanner chart's image
H vs HLT vs MAR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Hyatt Hotels (H) vs. Hilton Worldwide (HLT) vs. Marriott International (MAR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MAR leads year-to-date performance at +14.64%, outperforming peers amid anticipation for upcoming quarterly results.
  • HLT delivered a strong Q1 earnings beat with RevPAR (revenue per available room) up 3.6% and raised full-year guidance, boosting recent momentum.
  • H trades at lower valuations but has shown price volatility in recent weeks, reflecting sector-wide pressures.
  • All three stocks benefit from franchise-heavy models in the recovering travel sector, with MAR holding the largest market cap at $94B.
  • Analyst targets suggest upside potential across the board, with HLT at $347 and MAR at $372 on average.
  • Hospitality stocks face macroeconomic risks like economic slowdowns, but travel demand remains resilient.

Introduction

Hyatt Hotels (H), Hilton Worldwide (HLT), and Marriott International (MAR) represent leading players in the global hospitality sector, primarily operating through franchised and managed hotel portfolios. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, business models, and positioning amid ongoing travel recovery and economic uncertainties. Traders seeking short-term momentum and long-term investors eyeing sector growth will find value in understanding their relative strengths, valuations, and catalysts in the current environment.

H Overview and Recent Performance

Hyatt Hotels Corporation (H) focuses on upscale, luxury, and lifestyle hotels worldwide, with a portfolio emphasizing owned, leased, and managed properties. In recent market activity, the stock has experienced downward pressure, closing around $164 after a 2.3% decline in a recent session, within a 52-week range of $120 to $181. Sentiment has been influenced by broader sector volatility and macroeconomic concerns, including potential travel demand softening. Earlier in the year, Hyatt lifted its 2026 outlook despite a 2025 net loss, signaling confidence in underlying operational improvements. Trading at relatively lower multiples compared to peers, H appeals to value-oriented investors monitoring hospitality recovery trends.

HLT Overview and Recent Performance

Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) is a leading global hospitality company operating through management, franchise, and ownership segments, with brands spanning luxury to economy tiers. Recent weeks have been positive following robust Q1 2026 results, where RevPAR rose 3.6% and adjusted EPS of $2.01 beat estimates, prompting raised full-year guidance. The stock, trading near $319 with a 10.97% YTD gain, reflects strengthened investor confidence amid broadening travel demand beyond luxury segments. At a trailing P/E of 48.6 and market cap of $72.5B, HLT's performance underscores its scale and operational resilience in recent market conditions.

MAR Overview and Recent Performance

Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) manages one of the largest hotel portfolios globally, franchising and operating brands from luxury (e.g., Ritz-Carlton) to select-service properties. The stock has shown solid momentum, up 14.64% YTD and closing around $355, buoyed by expansion news like the W Sardinia opening and strong U.S. hotel RevPAR trends. With Q1 earnings anticipated soon and projections for EPS growth, sentiment remains upbeat. At a trailing P/E of 37.3 and $94B market cap, MAR benefits from its dominant market share and steady revenue streams in recent activity.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across various strategies. These bots feature impressive stats, including annualized returns from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, and profit factors up to 11.70, with average trade durations from 1 day to 49 days. Employing styles like swing trading on industrials, trend following in small caps, and volatility plays, they cater to diverse timeframes such as 5-minute to 60-minute charts. While none currently focus on hospitality stocks like H, HLT, or MAR, the page highlights bots best suited to prevailing market conditions. Explore these for potential copy-trading opportunities aligned with current trends.

Head-to-Head Comparison

H, HLT, and MAR share franchise-dominant models minimizing real estate ownership risks while capitalizing on global travel growth. MAR leads in scale with 26% sector market share and highest YTD returns, but trades at a premium valuation. HLT offers superior recent momentum post-earnings, though its higher trailing P/E signals growth pricing. H provides relative value with lower multiples, appealing amid potential sector pullbacks. All face similar risks from economic slowdowns impacting leisure and business travel, yet benefit from resilient demand and expansion pipelines. Sentiment favors larger peers with proven catalysts over H's steadier but less dynamic profile.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI models would likely favor HLT in the current environment due to its earnings beat, RevPAR growth, and raised guidance signaling trend consistency and positive catalysts. MAR shows strong relative positioning with superior YTD gains, while H lags in momentum. This assessment reflects observable stability and market sentiment rather than guarantees of future performance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (H: $190.63HLT: $338.22MAR: $386.23)
Brand notoriety: HLT and MAR are notable and H is not notable
The three companies represent the Cable/Satellite TV industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: H: 140%, HLT: 88%, MAR: 121%
Market capitalization -- H: $17.95B, HLT: $77B, MAR: $101.84B
$H is valued at $17.95B, while HLT has a market capitalization of $77B, and MAR's market capitalization is $101.84B. The market cap for tickers in this @Cable/Satellite TV ranges from $101.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Cable/Satellite TV industry is $22.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

H’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and MAR’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).

  • H’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MAR’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLT and MAR are a better buy in the long-term than H.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

H’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and MAR’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • H’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, H, HLT and MAR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

H (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а +2.53% price change this week, while HLT (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was +2.07% , and MAR (@Cable/Satellite TV) price fluctuated +2.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was -1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

H is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

HLT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

MAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Cable/Satellite TV (-1.54% weekly)

Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAR($102B) has a higher market cap than HLT($77B) and H($18B). HLT has higher P/E ratio than MAR and H: HLT (51.64) vs MAR (40.44) and H (31.36). MAR YTD gains are higher at: 24.981 vs. H (19.113) and HLT (17.855). MAR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.94B vs. HLT (3B) and H (758M). H has more cash in the bank: 671M vs. HLT (564M) and MAR (454M). H has less debt than HLT and MAR: H (4.51B) vs HLT (13.1B) and MAR (17.4B). MAR has higher revenues than HLT and H: MAR (26.6B) vs HLT (12.3B) and H (7.13B).
HHLTMAR
Capitalization18B77B102B
EBITDA758M3B4.94B
Gain YTD19.11317.85524.981
P/E Ratio31.3651.6440.44
Revenue7.13B12.3B26.6B
Total Cash671M564M454M
Total Debt4.51B13.1B17.4B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
H vs HLT vs MAR: Fundamental Ratings
H
HLT
MAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
402023
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
24912
SMR RATING
1..100
9234
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
391711
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
52624
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
433831

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

H's Valuation (67) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as HLT (75) and is in the same range as MAR (97). This means that H's stock grew similarly to HLT’s and similarly to MAR’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (12) and is in the same range as H (24). This means that HLT's stock grew similarly to MAR’s and similarly to H’s over the last 12 months.

HLT's SMR Rating (3) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (4) and is significantly better than the same rating for H (92). This means that HLT's stock grew similarly to MAR’s and significantly faster than H’s over the last 12 months.

MAR's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as HLT (17) and is in the same range as H (39). This means that MAR's stock grew similarly to HLT’s and similarly to H’s over the last 12 months.

H's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as MAR (24) and is in the same range as HLT (26). This means that H's stock grew similarly to MAR’s and similarly to HLT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HHLTMAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
H
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWAV1.670.15
+9.87%
TaoWeave Inc.
LFST7.860.20
+2.61%
LifeStance Health Group
FGMC10.430.11
+1.07%
FG Merger II Corp
BHB36.660.26
+0.71%
Bar Harbor Bankshares
PKG216.64-10.69
-4.70%
Packaging Corp

H and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, H has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if H jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To H
1D Price
Change %
H100%
-1.78%
MAR - H
77%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
HLT - H
76%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
IHG - H
67%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
WH - H
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.68%
CHH - H
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
More

HLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLT has been closely correlated with MAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLT jumps, then MAR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLT
1D Price
Change %
HLT100%
-1.27%
MAR - HLT
85%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
H - HLT
77%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
IHG - HLT
70%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
WH - HLT
62%
Loosely correlated
-4.68%
CHH - HLT
46%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
More

MAR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MAR has been closely correlated with HLT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MAR jumps, then HLT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MAR
1D Price
Change %
MAR100%
-1.87%
HLT - MAR
84%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
H - MAR
76%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
IHG - MAR
74%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
WH - MAR
60%
Loosely correlated
-4.68%
CHH - MAR
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.01%
More