Advertisement
LIND or NCLH or VIK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Lindblad Expeditions Holdings (LIND) vs. Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings (NCLH) vs. Viking Holdings (VIK) Stock Comparison
1) Key Takeaways
- All three companies compete in travel and cruising but occupy distinct niches: LIND in expedition and land travel, NCLH in mass-market and upper-premium ocean cruising, and VIK in premium river, ocean, and expedition voyages.
- Momentum has diverged sharply: LIND and VIK have outperformed recently, while NCLH has lagged after cutting its full-year outlook.
- NCLH carries the heaviest balance-sheet burden, with net leverage above 5x, versus a far lighter debt profile at VIK and improving leverage at LIND.
- VIK shows the strongest forward-booking visibility, with a large share of future capacity already sold at higher prices.
- LIND combines record occupancy and net yields with a smaller market capitalization and premium valuation sensitivity.
2) Introduction
Investors evaluating the travel sector often encounter three very different businesses under the same broad "cruise" umbrella. LIND (Lindblad Expeditions Holdings) focuses on small-ship expedition travel and land experiences in partnership with National Geographic. NCLH (Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings) operates a large global fleet across three brands. VIK (Viking Holdings) targets affluent travelers with river, ocean, and expedition itineraries. This stock comparison examines recent performance, relative positioning, and risk so traders and investors can assess which profile best fits current market conditions.
3) LIND Overview and Recent Performance
Lindblad Expeditions Holdings operates expedition cruises and a growing portfolio of land-based travel brands, positioning it in the premium, experience-driven segment of leisure travel. In recent weeks the stock has drawn fresh attention after a strong rally, reflecting improving fundamentals rather than broad sector tailwinds. The company reported record occupancy and a sixth consecutive quarter of record net yields, while raising its full-year revenue outlook. Demand has been resilient across both its expedition and land segments, with 2027 and 2028 bookings pacing ahead of prior periods. At the same time, elevated fuel costs and the final step-up in its National Geographic royalty rate remain cost pressures. Analysts have noted that margins, while improving, still trail those of larger mass-market cruise peers.
4) NCLH Overview and Recent Performance
Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings is the world's third-largest publicly traded cruise company by berths, operating the Norwegian Cruise Line, Oceania Cruises, and Regent Seven Seas brands. Its recent market activity has been defined by a downward reset in expectations. The company beat earnings-per-share (EPS, the portion of profit allocated to each share) estimates but cut its full-year guidance, citing softer demand in Europe and Alaska, internal execution issues in marketing and revenue management, and higher fuel costs. Net yield, a key measure of revenue per passenger cruise day, is now expected to decline for the year. A heavy debt load and net leverage above 5x amplify the impact of weaker EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization). While management has launched a cost-savings program and luxury brands are performing relatively well, the mass-market Norwegian brand remains the primary source of pressure.
5) VIK Overview and Recent Performance
Viking Holdings is a premium cruise operator best known for its river fleet, complemented by smaller ocean and expedition ships. It has been a standout in the sector, with shares appreciating sharply over the past year and trading near record levels despite occasional pullbacks. The company reported solid revenue growth and strong forward bookings, with a very high proportion of current-year capacity already sold at higher price points. A leadership transition, as founder Torstein Hagen moved to executive chairman and Leah Talactac became chief executive officer, was absorbed by the market without disruption. Viking's affluent customer base, lighter net-debt position, newly authorized share buyback, and inclusion in a major global index have reinforced investor confidence. Its principal trade-off is valuation: it trades at a notably higher price-to-earnings (P/E, price divided by earnings per share) multiple than its mass-market peers.
6) Trending AI Robots
For traders seeking a data-driven edge across names like these, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a focused selection of automated trading strategies. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest and most suitable for current market conditions earn a place in this section. Each bot is distinguished by its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, statistics, and set of tickers it trades, allowing users to match a bot's approach to their own objectives and risk tolerance. Browse the Trending AI Robots to explore which automated strategies are currently positioned for the market's prevailing conditions.
7) Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast among these three stocks is scale and niche. NCLH is the largest and most diversified by capacity and geography, but that breadth has exposed it to broad demand softness and a high fixed cost and debt structure. VIK occupies a premium, brand-loyal segment with strong booking visibility and a cleaner balance sheet, yet its valuation reflects those advantages. LIND sits between the two: it is far smaller, focused on high-end experiential travel, and improving margins, but remains sensitive to fuel, royalty costs, and geopolitical disruptions to itineraries. In terms of sector exposure, all three face shared headwinds from fuel prices and travel demand shifts, but their risk profiles differ. NCLH faces execution and leverage risk, LIND faces concentration and cost risk, and VIK faces valuation risk. On recent momentum, LIND and VIK have trended more favorably, while NCLH's relative performance has lagged.
8) Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor VIK among the three. Viking combines the strongest forward-booking visibility, a lighter debt burden, resilient pricing power, and a supportive capital-return and leadership story, all of which suggest more consistent trend stability. LIND presents an improving but smaller and more volatile profile, while NCLH's earnings reset and high leverage introduce greater uncertainty. The AI's preference for VIK is expressed in probabilistic terms, reflecting relative strength rather than any certainty about future returns.
9) Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
LIND sees its Stochastic Oscillator ascending out of oversold territory
On October 21, 2026, the Stochastic Oscillator for LIND moved out of oversold territory and this could be a bullish sign for the stock. Traders may want to buy the stock or buy call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 60 instances where the indicator left the oversold zone. In 51 of the 60 cases the stock moved higher in the following days. This puts the odds of a move higher at over 85%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on LIND as a result. In 69 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
LIND moved above its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for LIND crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 17 of 23 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Following a +5.45% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LIND advanced for three days, in 240 of 292 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 158 of 216 cases where LIND Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 73%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for LIND moved out of overbought territory on October 14, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 36 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 30 of the 36 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 83%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for LIND turned negative on October 19, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 76%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LIND declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
LIND broke above its upper Bollinger Band on September 28, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 4 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-12.108) is normal, around the industry mean (0.398). LIND's P/E Ratio (-95.237) is considerably lower than the industry average of (24.861). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.670) is also within normal values, averaging (1.617). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.185) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.979) is also within normal values, averaging (2.686).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 25 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 79, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LIND’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 77 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
NCLH's RSI Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for NCLH moved out of oversold territory on September 25, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 29 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 26 of the 29 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 19, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NCLH as a result. In 57 of 79 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NCLH just turned positive on September 22, 2026. Looking at past instances where NCLH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
Following a +3.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NCLH advanced for three days, in 219 of 283 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 186 of 247 cases where NCLH Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 75%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 49 of 60 cases where NCLH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NCLH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
NCLH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 28 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. NCLH’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.782) is normal, around the industry mean (0.398). P/E Ratio (9.335) is within average values for comparable stocks, (24.861). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.195) is also within normal values, averaging (1.617). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.185) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.699) is also within normal values, averaging (2.686).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. NCLH’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 79, placing this stock worse than average.
Momentum Indicator for VIK turns positive, indicating new upward trend
VIK saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 06, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 39 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 32 of the 39 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 82%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for VIK just turned positive on October 02, 2026. Looking at past instances where VIK's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 19 of 24 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
VIK moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +4.58% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where VIK advanced for three days, in 128 of 166 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for VIK moved out of overbought territory on October 21, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 32 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 20 of the 32 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 62%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where VIK declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 54%.
VIK broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for VIK entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 45 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. VIK’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 53 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 91 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: VIK's P/B Ratio (23.831) is slightly higher than the industry average of (0.398). P/E Ratio (28.614) is within average values for comparable stocks, (24.861). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is also within normal values, averaging (1.617). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.185) among similar stocks. VIK's P/S Ratio (5.485) is slightly higher than the industry average of (2.686).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. VIK’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 79, placing this stock worse than average.
LIND | NCLH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 44 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LIND's Valuation (4) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCLH (61) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCLH (100) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew significantly faster than NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
NCLH's SMR Rating (28) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NCLH’s stock grew significantly faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as NCLH (60) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as NCLH (84) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to NCLH’s over the last 12 months.
| LIND | NCLH | VIK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LIND’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while NCLH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and VIK’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- LIND’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NCLH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- VIK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LIND’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NCLH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and VIK’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LIND’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NCLH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- VIK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LIND (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +2.64% price change this week, while NCLH (@Consumer Sundries) price change was +4.84% , and VIK (@Consumer Sundries) price fluctuated +4.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
LIND is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
NCLH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
VIK is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (-1.43% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
Advertisement
LIND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with VIK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then VIK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIND | 100% | +2.09% | ||
| VIK - LIND | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| NCLH - LIND | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| TNL - LIND | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| PRSU - LIND | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| BFAM - LIND | 38% Loosely correlated | -3.03% | ||
More | ||||
NCLH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NCLH has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NCLH jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NCLH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NCLH | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| CCL - NCLH | 82% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| RCL - NCLH | 75% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| VIK - NCLH | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| TNL - NCLH | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| BKNG - NCLH | 44% Loosely correlated | -3.38% | ||
More | ||||
VIK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIK has been closely correlated with CCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VIK jumps, then CCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIK | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| CCL - VIK | 71% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| RCL - VIK | 66% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| NCLH - VIK | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| LIND - VIK | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
| TNL - VIK | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AIBU | 66.73 | 1.80 | +2.77% |
| Direxion Daily AI and Big Data Bull 2X ETF (AIBU) | |||
| IAI | 179.11 | 2.98 | +1.69% |
| iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) | |||
| THY | 21.36 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Toews Agility Shares Dynamic Tactical Income ETF (THY) | |||
| AURU | 11.71 | N/A | N/A |
| Tradr 2X Long AUR Daily ETF | |||
| SPXT | 111.43 | -0.06 | -0.05% |
| ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Technology ETF (SPXT) | |||