LPLA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 25 of 35 cases where LPLA's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where LPLA's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 14 of 22 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 11, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on LPLA as a result. In 62 of 88 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for LPLA just turned positive on November 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where LPLA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Following a +4.40% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where LPLA advanced for three days, in 245 of 366 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where LPLA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
The Aroon Indicator for LPLA entered a downward trend on November 06, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 43 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. LPLA’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 79 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.042) is normal, around the industry mean (3.120). P/E Ratio (23.622) is within average values for comparable stocks, (6.734). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.404) is also within normal values, averaging (0.809). Dividend Yield (0.004) settles around the average of (8.976) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.364) is also within normal values, averaging (16.899).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 81 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
NDAQ moved above its 50-day moving average on October 20, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 23 of 32 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on NDAQ as a result. In 49 of 78 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NDAQ just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where NDAQ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The 10-day moving average for NDAQ crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +2.71% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NDAQ advanced for three days, in 226 of 353 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 188 of 340 cases where NDAQ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 55%.
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NDAQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.
NDAQ broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 13 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. NDAQ’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 71, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 88 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.995) is normal, around the industry mean (4.143). P/E Ratio (30.960) is within average values for comparable stocks, (19.659). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.712) is also within normal values, averaging (1.780). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.017) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.831) is also within normal values, averaging (7.166).
LPLA | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LPLA's Valuation (79) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (88). This means that LPLA’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LPLA (43). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.
LPLA's SMR Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (52). This means that LPLA’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPLA (61). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPLA’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPLA (81). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPLA’s over the last 12 months.
| LPLA | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 65% | 30 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 55% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LPLA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NDAQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LPLA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
LPLA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was -23.12%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.69%.
LPLA is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2027.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2027.
These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-0.13% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPLA has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LPLA jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LPLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPLA | 100% | -2.23% | ||
| RJF - LPLA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| SCHW - LPLA | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| NDAQ - LPLA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| MORN - LPLA | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| MCO - LPLA | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||