Advertisement
LPLA vs NDAQ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) vs. Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LPLA offers lower volatility with a beta of 0.57, appealing to stability-focused investors, while NDAQ has a beta of 1.02 and higher dividend yield at 1.24%.
- Both stocks show positive year-to-date gains around 7%, but NDAQ has demonstrated stronger momentum in recent weeks following robust Q1 earnings.
- NDAQ's market cap exceeds $51 billion compared to LPLA's $26.5 billion, reflecting broader scale in exchange operations.
- Recent developments include a cybersecurity incident for LPLA and AI-driven growth catalysts for NDAQ, influencing short-term sentiment.
- LPLA trades at a PE ratio of 30.2 versus NDAQ's 27.24, with upcoming earnings for LPLA potentially shifting relative performance.
Introduction
This stock comparison between LPLA and NDAQ examines two key players in the financial services sector: an independent broker-dealer platform and a global exchange operator. Traders seeking relative performance insights and investors evaluating stability versus growth potential will find value here. Amid evolving market conditions, including interest rate dynamics and technological advancements, understanding their business models, recent momentum, and risk profiles aids informed decision-making in portfolio allocation or trading strategies.
LPLA Overview and Recent Performance
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (LPLA) is a leading independent broker-dealer and investment advisory firm, providing technology, brokerage, and custody services to financial advisors managing client assets under management (AUM). In recent market activity, LPLA shares have exhibited resilience, posting gains of approximately 5-8% over recent weeks despite broader volatility. Currently trading near $330 with a year-to-date increase of 7.41%, performance has been supported by steady advisor recruitment and monthly activity growth, though tempered by a recent cybersecurity incident where hackers accessed some client accounts via advisors' devices. Anticipation for upcoming Q1 earnings, expected around late April, has bolstered sentiment, alongside affiliate acquisitions expanding regional presence.
NDAQ Overview and Recent Performance
Nasdaq, Inc. (NDAQ) operates global exchanges, provides market data, and delivers financial technology solutions, including trading platforms and regulatory services. Shares have shown strong upward momentum in recent weeks, advancing around 10% over the past month following Q1 2026 results that beat expectations with $1.41 billion in revenue and $0.96 EPS (earnings per share). Trading near $90 with a year-to-date gain of 6.60%, positive drivers include AI and cloud initiatives, dividend increase, and new trading approvals, enhancing investor confidence amid favorable FinTech trends.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights the platform's most suitable AI trading bots for current market conditions, curated from hundreds available—specifically 25 top performers selected from over 350 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots vary in trading styles such as swing, day, or pattern-based approaches, timeframes from intraday to long-term, and performance metrics including win rates often exceeding 60%, average returns ranging from 20-100% annually in backtests, and trade counts in the hundreds. This dynamic section showcases bots with proven adaptability, helping traders identify high-probability opportunities. Explore the page to evaluate bots aligned with your risk tolerance and market outlook.
Head-to-Head Comparison
LPLA and NDAQ operate in complementary financial ecosystems: LPLA focuses on advisor-centric wealth management with growth tied to AUM expansion and recruitment, while NDAQ leverages exchange volumes, data services, and tech infrastructure for recurring revenue. Recent momentum favors NDAQ post-earnings, contrasting LPLA's pre-earnings positioning. Risk profiles differ markedly—LPLA's low beta suits conservative allocations amid cyber risks, versus NDAQ's market-sensitive exposure boosted by AI catalysts. Sector-wise, both benefit from capital markets activity, but NDAQ offers superior scale and dividend appeal, trading off against LPLA's higher EPS potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward NDAQ based on superior trend consistency from recent earnings beats, emerging AI growth drivers, and stronger short-term relative performance. While LPLA provides defensive stability, NDAQ's catalysts position it favorably in the prevailing market environment, though LPLA could close the gap post-earnings.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LPLA is a Hold and NDAQ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LPLA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDAQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LPLA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NDAQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LPLA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDAQ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LPLA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LPLA (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -2.70% price change this week, while NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -7.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -5.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.25%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.64%.
Reported Earning Dates
LPLA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-5.38% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
@Financial Publishing/Services (-2.53% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
| LPLA | NDAQ | LPLA / NDAQ | |
| Capitalization | 23.6B | 46.7B | 51% |
| EBITDA | 2.3B | 3.32B | 69% |
| Gain YTD | -17.211 | -14.498 | 119% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.79 | 24.88 | 108% |
| Revenue | 18.3B | 8.3B | 220% |
| Total Cash | 1.11B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.41B | 9.45B | 78% |
LPLA | NDAQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 32 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ's Valuation (68) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LPLA (78). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.
NDAQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as LPLA (43). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to LPLA’s over the last 12 months.
LPLA's SMR Rating (45) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (53). This means that LPLA’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
LPLA's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (61). This means that LPLA’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
LPLA's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (85). This means that LPLA’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.
| LPLA | NDAQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 10 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 61% | 7 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 56% |
Advertisement
LPLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPLA has been closely correlated with RJF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LPLA jumps, then RJF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LPLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LPLA | 100% | -0.85% | ||
| RJF - LPLA | 71% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| SCHW - LPLA | 68% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| SF - LPLA | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| NDAQ - LPLA | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| MORN - LPLA | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
More | ||||
NDAQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDAQ | 100% | -0.15% | ||
| JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| MCO - NDAQ | 68% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||