NDAQ
Price
$73.79
Change
-$4.51 (-5.76%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
36.33B
20 days until earnings call
RJF
Price
$130.28
Change
-$11.61 (-8.18%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.84B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NDAQ vs RJF

Header iconNDAQ vs RJF Comparison
Open Charts NDAQ vs RJFBanner chart's image
Nasdaq
Price$73.79
Change-$4.51 (-5.76%)
Volume$3.6M
Capitalization36.33B
Raymond James Financial
Price$130.28
Change-$11.61 (-8.18%)
Volume$2.13M
Capitalization26.84B
NDAQ vs RJF Comparison Chart
Loading...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NDAQ vs. RJF commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDAQ is a Buy and RJF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (NDAQ: $73.79 vs. RJF: $130.28)
Brand notoriety: NDAQ and RJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NDAQ: 124% vs. RJF: 138%
Market capitalization -- NDAQ: $36.33B vs. RJF: $26.84B
NDAQ [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $36.33B. RJF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $26.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NDAQ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NDAQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NDAQ is a better buy in the long-term than RJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NDAQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NDAQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the short-term than NDAQ.

Price Growth

NDAQ (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -3.37% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +137.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.63% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NDAQ($36.3B) has a higher market cap than RJF($26.8B). NDAQ has higher P/E ratio than RJF: NDAQ (29.93) vs RJF (16.09). NDAQ YTD gains are higher at: -4.235 vs. RJF (-15.552). RJF has more cash in the bank: 2.61B vs. NDAQ (641M). RJF has less debt than NDAQ: RJF (3.14B) vs NDAQ (10.9B). RJF has higher revenues than NDAQ: RJF (11.7B) vs NDAQ (6.06B).
NDAQRJFNDAQ / RJF
Capitalization36.3B26.8B135%
EBITDA2BN/A-
Gain YTD-4.235-15.55227%
P/E Ratio29.9316.09186%
Revenue6.06B11.7B52%
Total Cash641M2.61B25%
Total Debt10.9B3.14B347%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NDAQ vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
NDAQ
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1613
SMR RATING
1..100
689
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1970
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RJF's Valuation (87) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (88). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NDAQ (16). This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (9) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NDAQ (68). This means that RJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NDAQ’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as RJF (54). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew similarly to RJF’s over the last 12 months.

NDAQ's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (70). This means that NDAQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NDAQRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NDAQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACNT12.87-0.05
-0.39%
Ascent Industries Co
EXAS44.28-0.28
-0.63%
Exact Sciences Corp
HSAI16.83-0.40
-2.32%
Hesai Group American Depositary Share each ADS represents one
IMVT15.78-0.64
-3.90%
Immunovant
MITQ0.71-0.03
-4.60%
Moving iMage Technologies

NDAQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been loosely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NDAQ
1D Price
Change %
NDAQ100%
-5.76%
MCO - NDAQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.05%
MS - NDAQ
55%
Loosely correlated
-9.51%
GS - NDAQ
54%
Loosely correlated
-9.21%
JEF - NDAQ
53%
Loosely correlated
-13.04%
SPGI - NDAQ
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.79%
More

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
-8.18%
SF - RJF
81%
Closely correlated
-10.87%
MS - RJF
72%
Closely correlated
-9.51%
EVR - RJF
69%
Closely correlated
-15.48%
GS - RJF
69%
Closely correlated
-9.21%
LPLA - RJF
67%
Closely correlated
-7.58%
More