Advertisement
CRWD or NOW or ZS
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and ZS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZS’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NOW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ZS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +8.49% price change this week, while NOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.15% , and ZS (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated +7.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.50%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
NOW is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
ZS is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-2.12% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-2.41% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | NOW | ZS | |
| Capitalization | 207B | 106B | 24.2B |
| EBITDA | 329M | 3.24B | 144M |
| Gain YTD | 73.291 | -32.607 | -33.336 |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 61.45 | N/A |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 14B | 3.17B |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 5.18B | 3.54B |
| Total Debt | 821M | 2.43B | 1.86B |
CRWD | NOW | ZS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 54 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 59 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 95 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZS's Valuation (54) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as NOW (79) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that ZS's stock grew similarly to NOW’s and somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for NOW (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s and significantly faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
NOW's SMR Rating (54) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (92) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZS (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NOW's stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s and somewhat faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as ZS (55) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as NOW (59) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to ZS’s and similarly to NOW’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as NOW (95) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to NOW’s and somewhat faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | NOW | ZS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 14 days ago 70% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.32% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 70% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 66% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| TENB - CRWD | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More | ||||
ZS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.