CRWD
Price
$183.24
Change
-$0.04 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
186.63B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NOW
Price
$106.57
Change
+$7.79 (+7.89%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
102.12B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZS
Price
$147.63
Change
+$5.31 (+3.73%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.01B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRWD or NOW or ZS

CRWD vs NOW vs ZS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (CRWD: $183.28NOW: $98.78ZS: $142.32)
Brand notoriety: CRWD, NOW and ZS are all notable
CRWD and ZS are part of the Computer Communications industry, and NOW is in the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWD: 31%, NOW: 108%, ZS: 13%
Market capitalization -- CRWD: $186.63B, NOW: $102.12B, ZS: $23.01B
$CRWD [@Computer Communications] is valued at $186.63B. $ZS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $ $23.01B. $NOW [@Packaged Software] has a market capitalization of $ $102.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $ $2.84T to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $ $473.06B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $ $28.15B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $ $10.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and ZS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRWD is a better buy in the long-term than NOW and ZS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and ZS’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NOW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • ZS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZS is a better buy in the short-term than CRWD, which in turn is a better option than NOW.

Price Growth

CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а -9.75% price change this week, while NOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.32% , and ZS (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated -5.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.68%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

NOW is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

ZS is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Computer Communications (-3.30% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

@Packaged Software (-0.58% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRWD($187B) has a higher market cap than NOW($102B) and ZS($23B). CRWD has higher P/E ratio than NOW and ZS: CRWD (765.02) vs NOW (61.74) and ZS (). CRWD YTD gains are higher at: 56.396 vs. NOW (-35.518) and ZS (-36.724). NOW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.24B vs. CRWD (329M) and ZS (144M). NOW has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. CRWD (4.55B) and ZS (3.54B). CRWD has less debt than ZS and NOW: CRWD (821M) vs ZS (1.86B) and NOW (2.43B). NOW has higher revenues than CRWD and ZS: NOW (14B) vs CRWD (5.09B) and ZS (3.17B).
CRWDNOWZS
Capitalization187B102B23B
EBITDA329M3.24B144M
Gain YTD56.396-35.518-36.724
P/E Ratio765.0261.74N/A
Revenue5.09B14B3.17B
Total Cash4.55B5.18B3.54B
Total Debt821M2.43B1.86B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWD vs NOW vs ZS: Fundamental Ratings
CRWD
NOW
ZS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
506950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
78
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18100100
SMR RATING
1..100
925493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
366060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6593100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
855050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZS's Valuation (54) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as NOW (78) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that ZS's stock grew similarly to NOW’s and somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for NOW (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew significantly faster than ZS’s and significantly faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.

NOW's SMR Rating (54) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (92) in the null industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZS (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NOW's stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s and somewhat faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NOW (60) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is in the same range as ZS (60) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to NOW’s and similarly to ZS’s over the last 12 months.

CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as NOW (93) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ZS (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to NOW’s and somewhat faster than ZS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWDNOWZS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRWD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NOW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OTIS71.931.16
+1.64%
Otis Worldwide Corp
SIBN16.620.15
+0.91%
SI-BONE
FIBK38.120.02
+0.05%
First Interstate BancSystem
HURA2.11-0.04
-1.86%
TuHURA Biosciences Inc
DTST3.12-0.14
-4.29%
Data Storage Corp

CRWD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWD
1D Price
Change %
CRWD100%
-0.08%
PANW - CRWD
77%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
OKTA - CRWD
70%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
NOW - CRWD
68%
Closely correlated
+7.44%
TENB - CRWD
66%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
ZS - CRWD
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
More

NOW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOW
1D Price
Change %
NOW100%
+7.44%
CRWD - NOW
68%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
MSFT - NOW
67%
Closely correlated
+0.03%
ASAN - NOW
66%
Loosely correlated
+4.41%
TTAN - NOW
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
PANW - NOW
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More

ZS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZS has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZS jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZS
1D Price
Change %
ZS100%
+1.88%
CRWD - ZS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
COIN - ZS
66%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
CLSK - ZS
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.98%
DDOG - ZS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
OKTA - ZS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
More