This comparison examines CVE, IMO, and SU, three prominent Canadian energy firms focused on oil sands development, conventional production, and refining. These stocks appeal to investors and traders monitoring the energy sector for commodity-linked returns, operational execution, and capital return programs. The analysis covers recent performance trends, business models, and positioning within the current market environment to support informed evaluation of relative opportunities.
Cenovus Energy Inc. operates as an integrated energy company with upstream oil sands and conventional assets alongside downstream refining. In recent weeks, the stock benefited from strong second-quarter 2026 results, including approximately $5.0 billion in adjusted funds flow and $3.8 billion in free funds flow. Upstream production reached 970.4 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day, while downstream crude throughput achieved a 95% utilization rate. The company returned $1.4 billion to shareholders through buybacks and dividends and raised full-year production guidance, supporting positive sentiment around volume growth and cash returns.
Imperial Oil Limited focuses on upstream exploration and production, primarily in the oil sands, as well as downstream refining and marketing in Canada. Recent market activity reflects steady operational performance aligned with sector peers, supported by efficient cost management and production stability. The company has maintained disciplined capital allocation, including ongoing shareholder returns amid broader energy price movements over the past several weeks. Market positioning emphasizes reliable output from established assets, contributing to consistent cash flow generation in the current environment.
Suncor Energy Inc. is an integrated energy producer with significant oil sands operations, conventional assets, and refining capabilities. In recent weeks, the stock has tracked sector trends influenced by crude prices and operational metrics such as utilization rates. The company continues to emphasize balance sheet strength and capital returns through dividends and repurchases. Performance reflects resilience in core production areas, with sentiment shaped by execution on efficiency initiatives and exposure to North American energy markets.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Bots exhibit varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and ticker sets, allowing users to review metrics such as win rates, average trade durations, and risk parameters across a wide range. This resource provides data-driven insights for evaluating automated approaches in dynamic markets. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page.
Business models overlap significantly, with all three companies deriving substantial revenue from oil sands extraction and integrated refining, though CVE has emphasized production expansion more recently. Growth drivers center on commodity prices and operational uptime, creating similar sensitivities across the group. Recent momentum favors CVE following its detailed quarterly beat and guidance raise, while IMO and SU show steadier profiles. Risk factors include regulatory pressures on carbon emissions and oil price volatility for all. Valuation metrics reflect comparable exposure to energy cycles, with market sentiment tied to sector-wide developments rather than company-specific divergences in recent activity.
Based on observable factors such as recent trend consistency, production guidance updates, and cash flow strength, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to CVE in the current environment due to its documented operational outperformance and capital return activity. IMO and SU remain competitive alternatives with stable positioning. This assessment draws from verifiable metrics and does not constitute investment advice.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIMO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and SU’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IMO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and SU’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CVE (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -6.43% price change this week, while IMO (@Integrated Oil) price change was -3.57% , and SU (@Integrated Oil) price fluctuated -10.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -5.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.81%.
CVE is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
IMO is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
SU is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
| CVE | IMO | SU | |
| Capitalization | 51.8B | 60.1B | 70B |
| EBITDA | 14.8B | 6.4B | 16.2B |
| Gain YTD | 66.962 | 44.769 | 35.482 |
| P/E Ratio | 10.99 | 20.45 | 11.24 |
| Revenue | 58B | 45.4B | 54.5B |
| Total Cash | 3.17B | 1.03B | 3.27B |
| Total Debt | 11.6B | 4.14B | 14.8B |
CVE | IMO | SU | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 31 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 55 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 7 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 64 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 47 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 15 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CVE's Valuation (25) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SU (28) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as IMO (55) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CVE's stock grew similarly to SU’s and similarly to IMO’s over the last 12 months.
IMO's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (18) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as CVE (38) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that IMO's stock grew similarly to SU’s and similarly to CVE’s over the last 12 months.
CVE's SMR Rating (45) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as SU (60) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as IMO (64) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CVE's stock grew similarly to SU’s and similarly to IMO’s over the last 12 months.
CVE's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as IMO (47) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is in the same range as SU (48) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CVE's stock grew similarly to IMO’s and similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.
IMO's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SU (58) in the Integrated Oil industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CVE (76) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that IMO's stock grew somewhat faster than SU’s and somewhat faster than CVE’s over the last 12 months.
| CVE | IMO | SU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 18 days ago 74% | 10 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 13 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 72% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVE has been closely correlated with SU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVE jumps, then SU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE | 100% | N/A | ||
| SU - CVE | 82% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| CRGY - CVE | 78% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| IMO - CVE | 77% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
| BP - CVE | 73% Closely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| EQNR - CVE | 70% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||