MTB
Price
$218.70
Change
+$2.65 (+1.23%)
Updated
Oct 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.84B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TFC
Price
$46.56
Change
+$0.99 (+2.17%)
Updated
Oct 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
57.53B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USB
Price
$57.40
Change
+$1.14 (+2.03%)
Updated
Oct 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
91.58B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MTB or TFC or USB

MTB vs TFC vs USB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 12, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) vs. Truist Financial Corporation (TFC) vs. U.S. Bancorp (USB) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • MTB offers the strongest net interest margin of the group and a defensive, deposit-rich regional franchise, but carries the most cautious analyst stance of the three.
  • TFC is delivering the fastest earnings growth and an aggressive capital-return program, though its net interest income outlook has been trimmed.
  • USB combines the largest scale, the highest profitability ratios, and the most concrete near-term catalysts among the three.
  • All three are highly correlated U.S. regional and super-regional banks, so relative performance hinges more on execution, fee diversification, and capital allocation than on divergent business models.
  • Recent market activity has favored USB on a one-year basis, while all three have pulled back from recent highs.

Introduction

M&T Bank Corporation, Truist Financial Corporation, and U.S. Bancorp are three of the largest U.S. regional and super-regional banking franchises, each operating thousands of branches and managing hundreds of billions of dollars in assets. Although they share a common dependence on interest rates, loan growth, and credit quality, their geographic footprints, fee businesses, and strategic priorities differ meaningfully. This stock comparison is relevant for investors and traders evaluating relative performance and market positioning within the banking sector — whether they seek dividend income, balance-sheet stability, or exposure to fee-driven growth. By examining recent results side by side, readers can better assess which franchise is best positioned in the current environment.

MTB Overview and Recent Performance

MTB, M&T Bank Corporation, is a Buffalo, New York-based regional bank with a dense footprint across roughly twelve Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern states plus Washington, D.C. The franchise is known for conservative underwriting and a low-cost deposit base, strengthened by its 2022 acquisition of People's United. In its most recent reported quarter, net interest margin (NIM — the spread between what a bank earns on loans and pays on deposits) stood near 3.7%, among the highest of its peer group.

In recent weeks, MTB shares have traded in the low-to-mid $200s, having retreated from 52-week highs after a strong multi-month advance. Over the past year the stock has gained roughly 15%, outperforming many regional peers at its peak. Management has guided toward stable net interest income (NII — interest earned on loans minus interest paid on deposits) and continued fee-income growth, but a rising allowance for loan losses and lingering office commercial real estate exposure remain focal points for investors.

TFC Overview and Recent Performance

TFC, Truist Financial Corporation, is a Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank created by the 2019 merger of BB&T and SunTrust, with a dominant presence across the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic. The company has repositioned itself since divesting its insurance business in 2024, emphasizing fee-generating lines such as investment banking, wealth management, and digital banking.

Truist's recent results showed earnings per share (EPS — profit allocated to each outstanding share) rising about 25% year over year, with return on tangible common equity (ROTCE — a key profitability measure that excludes intangible assets) improving to roughly 14%. The bank raised its long-term profitability target and boosted its share-buyback plan, signaling confidence in capital generation. However, management trimmed its 2026 NII growth outlook, citing an unchanged federal funds rate and deposit-cost competition. TFC shares have lagged some peers on a one-year basis, trading in the mid-to-high $40s.

USB Overview and Recent Performance

USB, U.S. Bancorp, is a Minneapolis-based super-regional bank and the largest of the three by assets and market capitalization. Its business model is the most diversified, with a substantial payments and merchant-processing franchise, capital markets, wealth management, and a national credit card business alongside traditional banking.

U.S. Bancorp has posted several consecutive quarters of positive operating leverage, with ROTCE near 17% — the highest of this group. Recent catalysts include a partnership with Amazon to expand small-business lending, a pending acquisition of broker-dealer BTIG, and a national NFL partnership. Fee income has been a bright spot, growing at a high-single-digit pace. USB shares have advanced roughly 20% over the past year, though they have also pulled back in recent weeks along with the broader banking sector. The stock carries the strongest analyst consensus of the three, with a majority "Buy" rating.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron operates hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, yet only a select subset earns a place in its curated Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and the specific set of stocks they follow, allowing users to filter for approaches that match their own objectives. The trending list highlights the bots currently best suited to prevailing market conditions, whether that means momentum-driven strategies, mean-reversion models, or volatility-based approaches. For traders seeking a data-driven, systematic perspective on names like MTB, TFC, and USB, exploring the Trending AI Robots page offers a practical way to review which algorithms are generating signals in the current tape.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The three banks differ most sharply in scale, fee diversification, and profitability. USB is the largest and most diversified, with a payments business that generates recurring, non-interest revenue and reduces sensitivity to rate movements. Its ROTCE and operating leverage are the strongest of the trio, and its Amazon and BTIG initiatives provide identifiable catalysts. Its primary trade-off is a thinner NIM and a more complex, acquisition-driven growth agenda.

MTB is the most traditional lender, offering the highest NIM and a conservative credit culture. This provides defensive stability but comparatively less fee-based upside, and its commercial real estate concentration remains a watch item. TFC sits in between: it is actively shifting toward fee income and returning substantial capital to shareholders, yet its NII trajectory is the most constrained of the three. On valuation, all three trade in a similar single-digit-to-low-teens price-to-earnings range, meaning relative positioning now hinges largely on momentum, catalysts, and execution rather than clear valuation gaps.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors — trend consistency, profitability, diversification, and near-term catalysts — Tickeron's AI would most likely favor USB among the three. U.S. Bancorp combines the strongest profitability ratios, the most diversified revenue base, and the most concrete growth drivers in its Amazon partnership and BTIG acquisition. Its higher analyst conviction and superior one-year momentum further support this positioning. That said, the verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive: all three remain sensitive to interest-rate expectations and credit trends, and a shift in those variables could quickly alter relative standing. Traders and investors should weigh these trade-offs against their own time horizon and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for MTB with price predictions
Oct 15, 2026

MTB in -1.75% downward trend, sliding for three consecutive days on October 14, 2026

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where MTB declined for three days, in 157 of 268 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Aroon Indicator for MTB entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MTB's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 18 of 23 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 40 of 57 cases where MTB's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MTB as a result. In 47 of 76 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MTB just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where MTB's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

Following a +0.57% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MTB advanced for three days, in 203 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.

MTB may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 31 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 49 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.248) is normal, around the industry mean (1.323). P/E Ratio (11.670) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.307) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.027) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.488) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. MTB’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for TFC with price predictions
Oct 15, 2026

TFC in -2.29% downward trend, sliding for three consecutive days on October 14, 2026

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where TFC declined for three days, in 185 of 295 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Aroon Indicator for TFC entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where TFC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 11 of 20 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 55%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 43 of 62 cases where TFC's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on TFC as a result. In 53 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TFC just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where TFC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.

Following a +1.40% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TFC advanced for three days, in 203 of 323 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.

TFC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 5 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 18 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.980) is normal, around the industry mean (1.323). P/E Ratio (10.825) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.066) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.044) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.954) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 60 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. TFC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 91 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TFC’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for USB with price predictions
Oct 15, 2026

USB's Indicator enters downward trend

The Aroon Indicator for USB entered a downward trend on October 15, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 186 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 119 of the 186 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 64%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where USB declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where USB's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 45 of 62 cases where USB's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on USB as a result. In 54 of 94 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for USB just turned positive on October 12, 2026. Looking at past instances where USB's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.

Following a +0.68% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where USB advanced for three days, in 177 of 304 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.

USB may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 37 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 39 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.511) is normal, around the industry mean (1.323). P/E Ratio (11.733) is within average values for comparable stocks, (23.509). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.773) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.035) settles around the average of (0.030) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.141) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. USB’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 71 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. USB’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock worse than average.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MTB vs TFC vs USB: Fundamental Ratings
MTB
TFC
USB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77728
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
319171
SMR RATING
1..100
654
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
586057
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
485437
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
759090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TFC's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as USB (39) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as MTB (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TFC's stock grew similarly to USB’s and similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

MTB's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USB (71) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TFC (91) in the null industry. This means that MTB's stock grew somewhat faster than USB’s and somewhat faster than TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as TFC (5) in the null industry, and is in the same range as MTB (6) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that USB's stock grew similarly to TFC’s and similarly to MTB’s over the last 12 months.

USB's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (58) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as TFC (60) in the null industry. This means that USB's stock grew similarly to MTB’s and similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

USB's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MTB (48) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as TFC (54) in the null industry. This means that USB's stock grew similarly to MTB’s and similarly to TFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MTBTFCUSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2026
Stock price -- (MTB: $218.65, TFC: $46.57, USB: $57.39)
Brand notoriety: MTB and TFC are not notable and USB is notable
The three companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MTB: 126%, TFC: 175%, USB: 171%
Market capitalization -- MTB: $31.84B, TFC: $57.53B, USB: $91.58B
$MTB is valued at $31.84B, while TFC has a market capitalization of $57.53B, and USB's market capitalization is $91.58B. The market cap for tickers in this @Regional Banks ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the @Regional Banks industry is $6.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MTB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while TFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and USB’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MTB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • USB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the long-term than USB, which in turn is a better option than TFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MTB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and USB’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MTB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • USB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTB is a better buy in the short-term than TFC and USB.

Price Growth

MTB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while TFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.84% , and USB (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +0.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

MTB is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

TFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.

USB is expected to report earnings on Jan 19, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.46% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.