Advertisement
ADSK vs TEAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autodesk (ADSK) vs. Atlassian (TEAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both ADSK and TEAM operate in the software sector with subscription-based models focused on design, engineering, and collaboration tools, making them relevant for investors seeking exposure to AI-enhanced productivity solutions.
- Recent market activity shows TEAM delivering stronger year-to-date returns compared to ADSK, driven by robust cloud revenue growth following its fiscal third-quarter results.
- ADSK reports solid revenue expansion in its latest quarter and benefits from analyst optimism ahead of its upcoming earnings release, though it faces noted competitive pressures in design software.
- Growth drivers differ with ADSK emphasizing AI integration in 3D design and simulation, while TEAM highlights AI-powered workflow platforms and data center performance.
- Risk factors include sector-wide competition and valuation sensitivity for both stocks, with TEAM exhibiting higher recent volatility tied to earnings reactions.
- Market sentiment appears constructive for both amid broader software sector interest in artificial intelligence applications, though relative positioning favors momentum in cloud and collaboration segments.
Introduction
This comparison examines ADSK and TEAM, two established software companies whose solutions support professional design, project management, and team collaboration workflows. The analysis highlights observable differences in business focus, recent performance trends, and market positioning within the technology sector. Institutional investors, growth-oriented traders, and those monitoring artificial intelligence adoption in enterprise tools may find this side-by-side review useful for assessing relative opportunities in a dynamic software landscape.
ADSK Overview and Recent Performance
Autodesk, Inc. develops design and engineering software used across architecture, manufacturing, and construction industries. Its core offerings include computer-aided design platforms that increasingly incorporate artificial intelligence features for automation and simulation. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience with year-to-date gains exceeding broad market benchmarks, supported by steady subscription revenue growth. The company reported fiscal first-quarter results reflecting double-digit revenue increases, while analysts project continued expansion ahead of the next earnings release. Sentiment has been influenced by competition in the design software space alongside positive analyst commentary on AI-driven product enhancements, contributing to a measured performance profile over recent weeks.
TEAM Overview and Recent Performance
Atlassian Corporation provides collaboration and project management software, including tools for issue tracking, documentation, and team coordination. Its platform serves technology, operations, and service teams with a growing emphasis on cloud delivery and artificial intelligence capabilities. Recent market activity reflects strong momentum following fiscal third-quarter results that exceeded expectations, with notable cloud and data center revenue contributions driving an immediate positive stock reaction. Year-to-date returns have significantly outpaced the broader market, bolstered by customer commitments to longer-term subscriptions. Performance in recent weeks has been shaped by earnings momentum and sector interest in workflow automation, though earlier periods showed sensitivity to broader software valuations.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a much larger pool of hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers and employ varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics tailored to current market conditions. Only those demonstrating strong suitability based on backtested statistics, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability earn placement in the trending section. Available bots display diverse profiles, including ranges of win rates, profit factors, and drawdown controls, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific trading styles. For additional details on these AI-driven tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In business model terms, both companies rely on recurring subscription revenue, though ADSK centers on specialized design and simulation applications while TEAM emphasizes cross-functional collaboration platforms. Growth drivers contrast with ADSK leveraging AI for three-dimensional modeling efficiency and TEAM advancing AI integration within its work-management ecosystem alongside cloud and data center expansion. Recent momentum favors TEAM following its earnings beat and associated share price appreciation, whereas ADSK maintains steadier positioning ahead of its own reporting cycle. Risk factors encompass competitive intensity in enterprise software for both, with TEAM displaying greater sensitivity to quarterly results and ADSK facing design-tool market share dynamics. Sector exposure remains similar within technology, yet market sentiment currently reflects stronger near-term tailwinds for collaboration and cloud-oriented offerings.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings delivery, revenue growth consistency, and relative share price momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term positioning to TEAM. This assessment incorporates TEAM’s demonstrated cloud acceleration and post-earnings response against ADSK’s awaiting catalyst and steadier but less pronounced recent trend. The evaluation remains probabilistic and tied to verifiable data points rather than forward projections.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and LimitationsTo compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADSK is a Hold and TEAM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ADSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADSK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.58% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.62%.
Reported Earning Dates
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.49% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| ADSK | TEAM | ADSK / TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 48.6B | 25.2B | 193% |
| EBITDA | 1.99B | -21.17M | -9,395% |
| Gain YTD | -22.313 | -38.652 | 58% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.57 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.21B | 6.19B | 116% |
| Total Cash | 2.6B | 1.14B | 229% |
| Total Debt | 2.73B | 1.24B | 220% |
ADSK | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADSK's Valuation (77) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (23) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that ADSK’s stock grew significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ADSK (63) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADSK (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than ADSK’s over the last 12 months.
| ADSK | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
TEAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | -2.00% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -3.51% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| FRSH - TEAM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| SPT - TEAM | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
More | ||||