Advertisement
ADSK or HUBS or NTNX
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autodesk (ADSK) vs. HubSpot (HUBS) vs. Nutanix (NTNX) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Autodesk (ADSK) reported solid fiscal first-quarter revenue growth of 15% and maintains strong analyst support ahead of its upcoming earnings release, with emphasis on AI-driven design tools.
- HubSpot (HUBS) delivered robust 23% revenue growth in its first quarter but saw its stock decline sharply post-earnings amid broader valuation concerns in the SaaS sector.
- Nutanix (NTNX) continues to show operational momentum in hybrid cloud solutions, with recent share buyback expansions and preparations for its next earnings report.
- Relative performance highlights contrasts: ADSK exhibits steadier sentiment, HUBS faces post-earnings pressure despite beats, and NTNX trades at lower absolute levels with mixed analyst views on near-term growth.
- All three operate in software and cloud-adjacent sectors, exposing them to similar macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and enterprise spending patterns.
- Market positioning differs notably, with varying sensitivities to AI adoption trends and recurring revenue stability.
Introduction
Autodesk (ADSK), HubSpot (HUBS), and Nutanix (NTNX) represent distinct segments within the broader technology and software industry, making them relevant for comparison among investors and traders focused on growth-oriented equities. Autodesk provides design and engineering software, HubSpot offers customer relationship management and marketing platforms, and Nutanix specializes in hybrid cloud infrastructure. This analysis examines their recent stock behavior, business fundamentals, and relative positioning in the current market environment. Professionals monitoring software-as-a-service (SaaS) valuations, enterprise technology spending, and sector rotation may find the comparison useful for assessing portfolio diversification across these names.
ADSK Overview and Recent Performance
Autodesk (ADSK) develops design, engineering, and entertainment software solutions used across architecture, manufacturing, and media industries. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near the $241 level amid anticipation for its fiscal first-quarter earnings scheduled for late May. The company previously reported 15% year-over-year revenue growth to $1.6 billion, supported by recurring subscription models. Analyst commentary has highlighted potential advantages in artificial intelligence integration for its product suite, contributing to generally constructive sentiment. Broader sector dynamics in software have influenced price action, with the shares showing resilience relative to peers during periods of market volatility.
HUBS Overview and Recent Performance
HubSpot (HUBS) provides a customer platform encompassing marketing, sales, and service tools primarily for small and mid-sized businesses. Recent performance reflects a post-earnings reaction following its first-quarter report, which showed revenue of $881 million, representing 23% growth and an earnings-per-share beat. Despite the operational strength and noted progress in artificial intelligence features, the stock declined notably afterward and has traded around the $202 area, near multi-year lows in percentage terms from prior peaks. Analyst actions included several price target reductions in the immediate aftermath, reflecting caution on valuation multiples amid sector-wide adjustments.
NTNX Overview and Recent Performance
Nutanix (NTNX) delivers hybrid cloud infrastructure software that enables enterprises to manage workloads across public and private environments. In recent weeks, the stock has hovered near $47, with intraday movements influenced by broader technology sector flows and preparations for its upcoming quarterly results. The company has expanded its share repurchase authorization and maintained focus on subscription-based recurring revenue. Earlier fiscal second-quarter results demonstrated earnings beats and revenue expansion, though near-term growth projections have drawn varied analyst interpretations. Market sentiment remains tied to enterprise information technology spending cycles and competitive positioning in cloud infrastructure.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across equities, with strategies spanning various styles, timeframes, and risk parameters. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends, stability metrics, and performance statistics earn placement in the trending section. Available bots exhibit a range of historical win rates, average returns per trade, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to review detailed statistics before engagement. All AI trading bots feature distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional context.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models differ in end-market exposure: Autodesk (ADSK) emphasizes design and creative workflows with high switching costs, HubSpot (HUBS) targets marketing and sales automation with scalable subscription tiers, and Nutanix (NTNX) focuses on infrastructure modernization through hybrid cloud deployments. Growth drivers include artificial intelligence enhancements for Autodesk and HubSpot, while Nutanix benefits from hybrid cloud adoption trends. Recent momentum shows Autodesk supported by pre-earnings positioning, HubSpot experiencing post-report volatility despite beats, and Nutanix displaying relative price stability amid buyback activity. Risk factors encompass valuation compression in high-growth software names for HubSpot, execution on product roadmaps for all three, and sensitivity to enterprise capital expenditure cycles. Sector exposure places them within information technology, with varying degrees of cyclicality tied to macroeconomic conditions. Market sentiment reflects differentiated analyst responses, with Autodesk receiving reinstatements of positive ratings and the others facing targeted adjustments.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent sessions, stability around key levels, and positioning relative to upcoming catalysts, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward Autodesk (ADSK). This reflects steadier sentiment alignment and analyst support compared with post-earnings adjustments observed in the other names, though outcomes remain subject to earnings delivery and broader market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADSK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and NTNX’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- ADSK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NTNX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADSK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s), and NTNX’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADSK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
- NTNX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ADSK (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.36% , and NTNX (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated +5.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.15%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.39%.
Reported Earning Dates
ADSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
NTNX is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.01% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (+0.08% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| ADSK | HUBS | NTNX | |
| Capitalization | 41.4B | 9.49B | 13.4B |
| EBITDA | 2.33B | 267M | 373M |
| Gain YTD | -33.698 | -53.783 | -3.985 |
| P/E Ratio | 27.40 | 90.95 | 49.05 |
| Revenue | 7.51B | 3.3B | 2.75B |
| Total Cash | 2.92B | 1.69B | 2.02B |
| Total Debt | 2.72B | 247M | 1.53B |
ADSK | HUBS | NTNX | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 62 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 86 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 87 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 97 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 12 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTNX's Valuation (3) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADSK (75) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (77) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX's stock grew significantly faster than ADSK’s and significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (100) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX's stock grew similarly to ADSK’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
ADSK's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for NTNX (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that ADSK's stock grew significantly faster than HUBS’s and significantly faster than NTNX’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (65) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (87) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX's stock grew similarly to ADSK’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
NTNX's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ADSK (95) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that NTNX's stock grew similarly to ADSK’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| ADSK | HUBS | NTNX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 74% | 13 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
Advertisement
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | +8.92% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | +5.45% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | +5.44% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | +6.48% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 69% Closely correlated | +9.08% | ||
| FRSH - HUBS | 67% Closely correlated | +7.42% | ||
More | ||||
NTNX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTNX has been loosely correlated with ADSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTNX jumps, then ADSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTNX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTNX | 100% | +5.73% | ||
| ADSK - NTNX | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.44% | ||
| NOW - NTNX | 60% Loosely correlated | +9.85% | ||
| HUBS - NTNX | 59% Loosely correlated | +8.92% | ||
| DDOG - NTNX | 58% Loosely correlated | +8.52% | ||
| OKTA - NTNX | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.21% | ||
More | ||||