Advertisement
CRWD or HUBS or TENB
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and TENB’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TENB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and TENB’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TENB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а -9.75% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was -8.64% , and TENB (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated -19.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.85%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
TENB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-3.38% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-0.57% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | HUBS | TENB | |
| Capitalization | 183B | 11.4B | 3.56B |
| EBITDA | 329M | 267M | 71.6M |
| Gain YTD | 53.691 | -44.428 | 37.059 |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 117.37 | N/A |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 3.3B | 1.02B |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 1.69B | 360M |
| Total Debt | 821M | 247M | 419M |
CRWD | HUBS | TENB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 8 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 62 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 95 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TENB's Valuation (60) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (81) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that TENB's stock grew similarly to HUBS’s and somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew significantly faster than TENB’s and significantly faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (86) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (92) in the null industry, and is in the same range as TENB (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that HUBS's stock grew similarly to CRWD’s and similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TENB (37) in the Packaged Software industry, and is in the same range as HUBS (62) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to TENB’s and similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as HUBS (95) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CRWD's stock grew similarly to HUBS’s and somewhat faster than TENB’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | HUBS | TENB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 81% | 12 days ago 74% | 26 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CPSD | 26.76 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Dec | |||
| XOEF | 29.55 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | |||
| ISTB | 48.03 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF | |||
| IBTO | 23.92 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Trsy ETF | |||
| TBF | 25.12 | -0.05 | -0.20% |
| ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury | |||
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -1.73% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 77% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 70% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | +6.86% | ||
| TENB - CRWD | 66% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.50% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | +8.84% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 79% Closely correlated | +6.07% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | +10.35% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 71% Closely correlated | +12.97% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| BRZE - HUBS | 69% Closely correlated | +8.04% | ||
More | ||||