Refining stocks have been among the strongest performers in the energy sector over the past year, driven by tight global fuel inventories and constrained capacity. This stock comparison examines three independent downstream names spanning very different market capitalizations and business models: DK, PARR, and VLO. Investors weighing relative performance and market positioning in the refining space will find these three useful as a spectrum — from a large, diversified refiner to a small, regionally concentrated operator. The analysis that follows focuses on business context, recent momentum, balance-sheet quality, and the observable factors that could shape each stock's trajectory in the current environment.
Delek US Holdings is a diversified downstream energy company based in Brentwood, Tennessee, operating four refineries and holding roughly a 63% stake in the midstream partnership Delek Logistics Partners. In recent weeks, DK has shown strong operating momentum. Its second-quarter results reflected a sharp improvement in refining profitability, with adjusted net income reaching $343.9 million and adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) climbing to $638.7 million from $177.9 million a year earlier, supported by a 136% year-over-year increase in benchmark crack spreads. Management's Enterprise Optimization Plan — a cost and margin initiative targeting at least $220 million in annual free cash flow — has become a central part of the investment narrative. Shares have outperformed in recent months, though the company's elevated debt-to-capital ratio of roughly 88% remains a key risk factor.
Par Pacific Holdings is an integrated downstream company with about 219,000 barrels per day of refining capacity across Hawaii, Washington, Wyoming, and Montana, alongside retail and logistics operations. PARR has a distillate-heavy product mix, which positioned it well as diesel and jet-fuel margins strengthened. Its first-quarter results showed adjusted EBITDA of $91.5 million, up from $10.1 million a year earlier, helped by record Hawaii refining throughput. The company also began commercial operations at its Hawaii renewable fuels facility, including sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) capabilities. While shares have gained well over 100% over the past year, the stock has shown some near-term volatility, and a planned Hawaii refinery turnaround was expected to weigh on third-quarter throughput. PARR's trailing EV/EBITDA (enterprise value to EBITDA) multiple of roughly 3.5x is the lowest among these three names.
Valero Energy is one of the largest independent refiners in the United States, operating about 3.2 million barrels per day of throughput capacity across 15 refineries, along with a 50% stake in the Diamond Green Diesel renewable diesel joint venture and 12 ethanol plants. VLO has been a standout performer, with its stock up more than 140% year to date in recent market activity and on pace for its best annual return on record. Second-quarter net income reached $3.7 billion, or $12.62 per share, with refining segment operating income of $4.5 billion. The company's scale, access to cost-advantaged heavy and sour crude, and a net debt-to-capitalization ratio of just 11% distinguish it from smaller refiners. VLO trades at a premium valuation of roughly 8x trailing EV/EBITDA, reflecting its size and balance-sheet strength.
For traders looking to systematize decisions like this three-way stock comparison, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of algorithmic trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots covering thousands of tickers, but only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this rotating shortlist. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the set of tickers they trade — from momentum and swing strategies to longer-horizon trend models. Browsing the page gives investors a data-driven view of which approaches are currently gaining traction. Explore the Trending AI Robots to see which automated strategies align with your own analytical framework.
The clearest contrasts among these three stocks are scale, diversification, and balance-sheet risk. VLO operates a vast, flexible refining network with renewable diesel and ethanol exposure, supported by minimal leverage and strong cash generation. DK sits in the middle, pairing refining with recurring midstream cash flow but carrying meaningfully higher debt, which makes it more sensitive to margin downturns. PARR is the smallest and most concentrated, with a Pacific-region footprint and distillate-heavy yields that amplify both upside and downside in product markets.
On valuation, PARR is the cheapest on EV/EBITDA, while VLO commands the highest multiple as a reward for scale and financial stability; DK sits between them on a forward price-to-earnings basis. On momentum, all three have rallied strongly, but VLO has combined the largest gain with the most consistent upward trend and the least balance-sheet fragility. Risk factors also differ: DK faces leverage and turnaround risk, PARR faces geographic concentration and refinery-maintenance risk, and VLO faces valuation risk after its steep run.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, balance-sheet stability, diversification, and the durability of recent catalysts, Tickeron's AI would likely favor VLO in the current environment. Its combination of a large, flexible refining footprint, renewable fuels exposure, minimal leverage, and sustained earnings momentum offers a more stable risk profile than its two smaller peers. That said, the verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive: PARR presents a cheaper, higher-beta expression of the same refining theme, while DK offers a self-help margin story and midstream diversification. Relative positioning could shift if refining margins normalize or if balance-sheet concerns re-emerge.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
DK | PARR | VLO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 89 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 14 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 19 | 34 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 36 | 11 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 86 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
DK's Valuation (71) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as VLO (73) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is in the same range as PARR (94) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that DK's stock grew similarly to VLO’s and similarly to PARR’s over the last 12 months.
VLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DK (8) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is in the same range as PARR (14) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that VLO's stock grew similarly to DK’s and similarly to PARR’s over the last 12 months.
DK's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as PARR (19) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is in the same range as VLO (34) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that DK's stock grew similarly to PARR’s and similarly to VLO’s over the last 12 months.
VLO's Price Growth Rating (11) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as DK (36) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry, and is in the same range as PARR (36) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that VLO's stock grew similarly to DK’s and similarly to PARR’s over the last 12 months.
DK's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PARR (86) in the Oil And Gas Production industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for VLO (99) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that DK's stock grew somewhat faster than PARR’s and significantly faster than VLO’s over the last 12 months.
| DK | PARR | VLO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 80% | 13 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 74% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
DK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while PARR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and VLO’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
DK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PARR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and VLO’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
DK (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +11.75% price change this week, while PARR (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +12.25% , and VLO (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price fluctuated +7.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +5.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.36%.
DK is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
PARR is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
VLO is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVXC | 84.74 | 0.93 | +1.11% |
| Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) | |||
| PSC | 68.15 | 0.61 | +0.90% |
| Principal U.S. Small-Cap ETF (PSC) | |||
| GVLE | 47.77 | 0.17 | +0.35% |
| Goldman Sachs Value Opportunities ETF (GVLE) | |||
| ASMH | 13.00 | N/A | N/A |
| ASML HOLDING NV ADRHEDGED | |||
| BWG | 6.86 | -0.03 | -0.44% |
| BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLO has been closely correlated with MPC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VLO jumps, then MPC could also see price increases.